Wounding with Intent Flashcards

1
Q

What is the penalty and section?

A
Wounds with intent to GBH
Section 188(1) - 14 years Imprisonment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the elements?

A
  • With Intent to Cause GBH
  • To any person
  • Wounds, Maims, Disfigures or causes GBH to
  • Any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Intent?

A
  • In the context of criminal law there are two intents the
    first is there needs to be an intent to commit an act,
    second is there is an intent to get a specific result.
  • R v Taisaleka
    The nature of the blow and the gash produced to the
    Victim’s head strongly points to the presence of the
    necessary intent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Person?

A

Gender neutral, proven by circumstantial evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

GBH?

A

Grievous bodily harm can simply be define as really serious harm.

DPP v SMITH
Bodily harm needs no explanation and grievous means really serious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Wounds?

A

R v Waters
The breaking of skin is commonly regarded as characteristics of a wound. The breaking of skin normally evidenced by the flow of blood, and in its occurrence at the site of the blow or impact, the wound will more often than not be external. But there are those cases where the bleeding evidences the separation of tissues may be internal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is deliberate act?

A

Intent, means that act or omission must be done deliberately. The act or omission must be more than involuntary or accidental.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can you prove intent?

A

Admissions are good but circumstantial evidence are good to establish for support.

ie: - the offenders actions before, during or after the act.
- the surrounding circumstances
- the nature of the act itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How to prove intent for serious assaults?

A
  • Prior Threats
  • Evidence of premeditation
  • the use of the weapon
  • whether any weapon used was purposely or
    opportunistically brought
  • the number of blows
  • the degree of force used
  • the body parts targeted (ie head)
  • the degree of resistance or helplessness of the victim.
    (unconscious)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Psychiatric Injury, can it be included with bodily harm?

A

Yes, the Court has highlighted in Owen v Residential Health Management that psychiatric injury can be included, but doe not include mere emotions such as fear, distress, panic, or a hysterical or nervous condition.

Expert evidence will be required before an issue of psychiatric injure arises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Not limited to immediate harm?

A

R v Mwai,

In Mwai the Court included that section 188 is limited to immediate harm. Mwai infected HIV on the victims but there would need to be an expert medical witness to adduce that the progression of HIV to Aids then to death would be the outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Maiming?

A

Includes mutilating, crippling or disabling any member of the body of the victim depriving that person of the use or any of the senses. There needs to be some degree of permanence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Disfigures?

A

Means to deform or deface, or to mar or alter the appearance of the person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Murray and Rapana

A

The word disfigures covers not only permanent damage but also includes temporary damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Doctrine of Transferred Malice?

A

Means that the offender has intended apply force to a particular person but in the process has injured someone else accidentally, that person is still criminally liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly