World Cities Flashcards
Advantages of greenfield sites?
- no need to clean/make safe the site, thus cheaper
- existing road networks are not in place, thus not restricting planning
- often on edge of cities where land is cheaper
- developers have a blank canvas
- more space for gardens
- the environment is appealing to wealthy buyers
- generally close to motorways, thus good transport links
Advantages of brownfield sites?
- more sustainable as no new land is used
- prevents urban sprawl and reduces commute distances
- infrastructure and utilities are already in place
- easier to get planning permission
- closer to CBD for retail/jobs
What is Newcastle Great Park (Edge of Town Development CS)
- NGP is a greenfield, edge of city development within the greenbelt
- north of Newcastle
- developers, council and some owners want the plan approved
- conservationists, environmentalists and some urban planners oppose the idea
Arguments for NGP? (Edge of Town Development CS)
- 2500 new homes - good for richer residents and helping achieve home-building targets to reduce housing strain
- 80 hectares of commercial development which could create jobs (£50m HQ for Sage, 1500 jobs within 2 years)
- integrated transport plan where no home is further than 400m from a bus stop, 27km of cycle routes, cycle purchase scheme and car sharing database
- full time ranger employed to ensure local wildlife conservation
- lies next to A1 which will be improved and connects easily to the airport
- should slow down annual -1500 net migration
Arguments against NGP? (Edge of Town Development CS)
- three story properties at £200,000 are well beyond average earners in area
- further endanger red squirrel
- breaches greenbelt - loss of rural land
- space for 20,000 homes on brownfield sites in decline - which are in need of a boost
- no guarantee of job creating - maybe just displacement?
- traffic in Gosforth and Newcastle will increase
- innter-city regeneration would to more to slow outward migration
General Facts about Mumbai? (Urbanisation CS)
- Mumbai is a mega city on the West coast of India
- financial capital and service hub of India
- rural to urban migration has resulted in Mumbai’s population doubling since 1970 to almost 13 million
- more than half the population live in slums
Impacts of Urbanisation in Mumbai? (Urbanisation CS)
- poor living conditions in slums in terms of water, sanitation, etc.
- health services cannot cope (only 30% of urban poor served, IMR is 44/100,000)
- demand for water exceeds supply many years leading to rationing
- road network cannot cope
- waste management services overwhelmed, 25% of deaths in Chembur as related to burning waste
Management of Urbanisation in Mumbai? (Urbanisation CS)
- plan to clear Dharavi and develop a new, high-end township (locals against as they will be displaced and Dharavi’s recycling micro industries support the city)
- Slum Sanitation Program started in 1995 by NGOs, has built 330 communal toilet blocks in Mumbai slums
- rainwater harvesting systems are now compulsory on almost all new builds but only half have complied so far
- most people using scooters and moped to avoid congestion worsens air quality while reducing congestion
- public transport improvements planned: metro system with over 140km of rail due to be completed by 2021
What is Surbiton, Why is it Attractive and what are the Problems? (Managing Suburbanisation CS)
- suburb of SW London
- between 1970 and 2011 its population increased from 140,000 to 160,000 due to suburbanisation
- it has good transport links to central London - 18 mins by rail and close to A3
- variety of good quality housing at various prices
- wealthy area with shops and services
- good schools and numerous parks
- high car ownership (70%) and a large number of parked cars increased congestion
- currently in travel zone 6, making rail expensive so most use cars
- high house prices, £406k average compared to UK average of £226k resulting in economic segregation
How have the impacts of Suburbanisation in Surbiton been managed? (Managing Suburbanisation CS)
- improvements strategy for Surbiton town centre launched in 2009 including widening roads and set delivery times to rotate parking space usage
- neighborhood committee setup to involve residents in local decisions, but that have little real power
- campain to reclassify Surbiton as zone 5 to encourage rail travel
- secure bicycle storage at the station to encourage people to cycle there
Managing the impacts of Suburbanisation?
- redevelopment schemes to encourage people and businesses to move back to city centres e.g. Birmingham Big City Plan - retail/property-led
- greenbelt to prevent urban sprawl and protect the countryside
- congestion charges to reduce traffic - in London traffic reduced by 15%
- flood defense schemes to protect urban areas prone to flooding e.g. Shrewsbury
What/Where is St. Ives and what Impacts have Counter-Urbanistion had? (Counter-Urbanisation CS)
- town in Cambridgeshire, 70 miles North of London
- 5x increasing in population since 1960
- congestion is a major issue (especially on A14 to Cambridge)
- average house prices more than doubled between 2000 and 2010
- history of flooding issues and demand has led to development of properties on floodplain
- more shops and services available
- families moving to a previous ageing area has placed strain on schools
How have the Impacts of Counter-Urbanisation been managed in St. Ives? (Counter-Urbanisation CS)
- 200 new houses in 2010 with at least 75 as social rents
- expanding primary schools to make 250 new places
- flood protection costing £8.8mil including embankments and flood walls
- £116mil guided busway linking St. Ives to Huntingdon and Cambridge and train stations to reduce congestion
Context of the London Docklands Redevelopment? (Redevelopment/Re-Urbanisation CS)
- the Docklands used to be a hive of economic activity in the 19th/20th century
- began to decline due to containerization in the 1960’s
- Felixstowe port became major port
- by the 1980’s large parts of the Docklands were dereclict
- 150,000 job losses
- 20% of houses not suitable for living
- poor public transport, thus not well connected
LDDC was setup in 1981 to redevelop the area, eventually creating the second financial center of London
Positive Impacts of London Docklands Redevelopment? (Redevelopment/Re-Urbanisation CS)
ECONOMIC: part of the area made into an enterprise zone until 1992, by 1998 there were 2700 businesses with £7.7bn private investment and 85,000 jobs
HOUSING: 24,000 new homes built, including 6250 housing association of LA homes
TRANSPORT: DLR opened in 1987, cutting the journey to central London to sub 20 mins. New pedestrian and cycle routes and tube station.
COMMUNITY: new public facilities including a sailing and water sports center and the Surray Quays shopping complex. Five new health centers.
EDUCATION: new schools and colleges built and old ones refurbished e.g. new computers
ENVIRONMENT: pleasant environment after refurbishment. New outdoor spaces including an ecology park at Bow Creek
Since 1980, the population of the area has doubled.
Negative Impacts of London Docklands Redevelopment? (Redevelopment/Re-Urbanisation CS)
- conflict between wealthy residents and original residents due to domination of luxury developments of affordable housing
- jobs created (banking) were completely incompatible with the skill set of previous residents (dockers)
- most locals were simply displaced and the root issue of unemployment for them was not resolved
Attempts to Manage the London Docklands Redevelopment? (Redevelopment/Re-Urbanisation CS)
- LDDC some 40% of housing at affordable prices in some areas
- centers setup to provide training in literacy, numeracy and IT
- LDDC worked with Skillnet - a job agency designed to give people the skills they needed for employment e.g. construction
Context of Islington? (Gentrification CS)
- north London
- originally wealthy but rich left as railways expanded in late 19th century, allowing commutes
- poorer residents began to move in, causing overcrowding and decline
Why did the middle class begin moving to Islington in the late 60’s? (Gentrification CS)
- increasing well-paid service sector jobs in London
- well connected to the city center by Angel station
- houses were large and attractive and much cheaper than most of London, and could be renovated to suit their needs
- once the process begins, it drives itself
Impacts of Gentrification of Islington? (Gentrification CS)
Positive:
- improved housing as wealthy residents renew their homes while keeping original characteristics
- new businesses (wine bars, cafes, etc.) draw money and jobs to the area
Negative:
- house values tripled from 1996 to 2008, people on lower salaries forced out of the area or into social housing (50% of area in 2008)
- wealth segregation (8th most deprived area in England)
- some local businesses have closed e.g. pubs/convenience stores