wk 7- prognostic Flashcards
prognosis questions include
P- paint and specific condition relevant to prognosis
I- intervention
O- outcome
T- time
it is common for questions to just include P and O
prognosis hierarchy of evidence
level 1- systematic review of level II studies
level 2- prospective cohort study (0bservational study)
level III-1- not used for a prognostic question?
level III-2 analysis of the prognostic factors among the participants in one group of a RCT (lower on list because of its strict inclusion and exclusion criteria not representing the population)
level III-3 - retrospective cohort study. (incomplete Data risk, selection bias)
Level IV- case series or cohort study where participants are at different stages of the condition or disease
inception cohort is?
group of participants are enrolled in the study at the onset or very early in the progressing of their condition.
where to search for prognostic evidence?
pubmed clinical queries and change category to prognosis
5 year survival means?
% patients surviving 5 years from some point in the course of their disease
case fatality means?
% patients with disease who die of it
disease - specific mortality means?
number of patients per 10,000 or 100,000 population dying of disease
response means?
% patients showing some evidence of improvement following an intervention
remission means?
% patients entering. phase in which disease is no longer detectable
recurrence means?
% patients who have return of disease after a disease-free interval
whats wrong with retrospective cohort studies? 2
- recruitment bias
- systematically miss patients with particular characteristics
appraisal- how can you tell there is a representative and well defined sample of participants?
similarity at the start and all patients or consecutive cases/patients
appraisal- were participants recruited at a common point in the disease/condition?
inception cohort is the best way to avoid this bias
appraisal- was exposure determined accurately (intervention)
look at eligibility criteria and if participants were enrolled into the study but did not undergo completely
appraisal- was follow up sufficiently long and complete?
loss to follow up (5 and 20 rule)
- <5% loss to follow up unlikely to influence results
>20 seriously impacts validity