With an intention to permanently deprive

Question 1

What did R v Velumyl (1989)- outline?

Answer 1

• Took money from the safe intended to replace.

- Unless intending to replace with exact same notes then it is theft.

Question 2

Is conditional intent sufficient for theft?

Answer 2

No.

Question 3

What case outlined that conditional intent is not sufficient for theft?

Answer 3

R V Easom (1971)

Bag rummager

Question 4

S6 (1)- two steps to IPD? TTAO

BOLOD

Answer 4

1-They treat the thing as their own (to dispose of regardless of the others rights)

2- A borrowing or lending that amounts to an outright taking or disposal.

Question 5

What case outlines ‘to treat the thing as his own’?

Answer 5

DPP V Lavender (1994

-Council door- treated as his own to dispose of.

Question 6

What case outlines a ‘borrowing or lending amounting in an outright taking?

Answer 6

• R V Lloyd.
• Films returned in perfect condition.
• All goodness and virtue must be taken in theft.