UDAM- Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Background information for UDAM?

A
  • Needs an act cannot just be an omission
  • An OFFENCE.
  • involuntary manslaughter
  • Discressionary life sentence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What two offences makes up involuntary manslaughter?

A
  • UDAM.

- GNM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the actus reus of UDAM?

A
  • An act
  • That is unlawful
  • Dangerous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the mens rea of UDAM?

A
  • The MR of the chosen unlawful act.

- No need for the D to foresee the death or the serious injury. (DPP V Newbury and Jones)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is UDAM also known as?

A

-Constructive manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the structure of UDAM?`

A

1- Positive act (not an omission).

2-Unlawful act (pick the act).

3-Dangerous.

4-More than minimal and trivial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case references the positive act?

A

R V Lowe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does it mean by an unlawful act?

A

-Must be criminal and not tortious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case helped define that the act must be criminal?

A

R V Franklin (1833)

  • No criminal act, so cannot lead to a conviction.
  • Threw a stone off a pier, didn’t know anyone was there, hit them and they died
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case defined a dangerous act?

A

R V Church.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R V Church?

A

If all sober reasonable people would inevitably realise some harm- al beit serious harm could happen

-Purely subjective, D’s own knowledge is irrelevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which cases reference a dangerous act?

A

R V Dawson

R V Watson

R V Ball

R V Kennedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R V Dawson

A
  • Corner shop with gun.
  • 60-year-old man cashier died of a heart attack.

the sensible reasonable bystander would have not been aware of his condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R V Watson

A
  • Confrontation between D and V and V died of a heart attack 90 mins later (he was eighty-seven).
  • CA held the burglary was dangerous, the D was found not guilty because of causation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R V Ball (Ballz)

A

Real bullets and blanks, wanted to scare his neighbour but shot him and he died.

-Reasonable person/ objective test- not what the D knew.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v HM Coroner for Inner London [1998])

A

-Does the unlawful act cause the death?

17
Q

Causation

A

‘but for’ R V White.

18
Q

DPP V Newbury and Jones?

A

No need for the D to foresee the death or the serious injury

19
Q

What type of offence is UDAM?

A

A common law offence.

20
Q

How should i talk about UDAM?

A
  • Intro
  • Positive act.
  • Unlawful act.
  • Dangerous
  • Causation
  • MR of chosen act.
  • DPP V Newbury and Jones.
21
Q

What is the MR of assault?

A

The intention or recklessness as to cause the cause the V to apprehend immediate unlawful physical violence.

22
Q

What is the AR of assault?

A

The D must cause the V to apprehend immediate unlawful physical violence.