wills Flashcards

1
Q

burdens of pro per and clear

A

Burden of production- burden to present evidence to avoid direct verdict
Burden of persuasion -preponderance of evidence standard more than 50
Clear and convincing without hesitancy of truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

valid will needs

A

will formalities
testamentary intent
testamentary capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

testamentary capacity

A

18 or older or emancipated
testator has capacity if The natural objects of her bounty;
– The nature and extent of her property;
– (The disposition made;) and
– The relationships of these elements in forming a plan for
disposition.
presumed to have unless adjudicated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

challenges to capacity

A

bop , in will challenge other than undue influence, burden on contestant
-Whole or portion whichever Is challenged will be void
-Physical or mental no affect if testator understands
-Adjudication of incomp shifts burden to the proponent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

will formalities

A

writing, sig (testator or another person in the presence of testator) any mark, signed at the end, presence of two witnesses, witnesses sign in presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

witnesses

A

competent, presence line of sight / line of conscious (aware of sig)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

attestation clause

A

recites facts of execution
used as evidence if witness unavailable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

self proving affidavit

A

sworn statement at execution , subscribed by witnesses
permits will to be into probate with no further proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

proof of will

A

if spa no further needed , no spa oath of witness required if unavailable then personal rep may swear authenticity or dis interested person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

electronic will

A

Qualified Custodian: The qualified custodian is the person or entity that
safeguards an electronic will after its execution.

Online Notary Public:RON must determine that the principal is not a “vulnerable adult.(ability to perform the normal activities of daily living or to provide for his or
her own care or protection is impaired due to a mental, emotional, sensory,
long-term physical,)

must ask : decision impaired drugs, mental or physical cond, assistance with care

if
the witnesses are not in the same location as the principal,
the RON must ask the principal the following questions:
 Are you currently married? If so, name your spouse.
 Please state the names of anyone who assisted you in
accessing this video conference today.
 Please state the names of anyone who assisted you in
preparing the documents you are signing today.
 Where are you currently located?
 Who is in the room with you?

An electronic text document will satisfy the writing
requirement.
 However, audio and video recordings will not suffice

presence could be audio look uip the rrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

look up presumption chat in slides

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

testamentary intent

A

present intent to create will (last will and test makes presumption)
Condition precedent not allowed but is allowed for devisee in will
Motive A will is effective if the court finds that conditional language merely shows the testator’s motive for executing will (i am executing this because chemo)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Insane illusion illogical belief

A

person believes nonexistent facts
Ib not grounds for test cap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Undue influence

A
  • person exerts control over the mind of testator controlling free will , substituting will or making him do something he wouldn’t of
    • presumption arises if person exerting control was sub beneficiary , had confidential relationship or actively involved in procuring will
  • once presumption burden pro and per on beneficiary to explain
  • More proof than explanation needed if test was mentally impaired

Carpenter Active Procurement Factors
 Presence of the beneficiary at the execution of the will.
 Presence of the beneficiary on those occasions when the testator
expressed a desire to make a will.
 Recommendation by the beneficiary of an attorney to draw the will.
 Knowledge of the contents of the will by the beneficiary prior to
execution.
 Giving of instructions on preparation of the will by the beneficiary to the
attorney drawing the will.
 Securing of witnesses to the will by the beneficiary.
 Safekeeping of the will by the beneficiary subsequent to execution.

-no confidential relationship undue influence can be proves by suspicious circumstances with unnatural gift preferring stranger over blood relatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fraud in the factum

A

person doesn’t know what their executing
Fraud part void

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fraud in inducement

A

-fraud in the inducement exists when a person knows the nature of the document but is fraudulently induced to execute the will
-(testator makes large gift to person who thinks will care for children)
-if fraud leads to omission enforcement of will not affected if leads to inclusion court may impose constructive trust on defrauding party
-mistake in the inducement not grounds for voiding
- not void instead f a fraudulent inducement leads to an omission from a will,
enforcement of the will generally is not affected.
* However, if that fraud also leads to the inclusion of a gift to the
party who practiced the fraud, the court may impose a
constructive trust on the defrauding party.

17
Q

if revocation also because of fraud etc then void

A
18
Q

mistake

A
  • in execution void (thinks signing something else )
  • mistake in inducement - test drafted and signed will based on mistake of fact or law will is not void
  • Something inconsistent with testators intent will is not void
  • reform to intent - must prove clear and convincing evidence testators intent
  • Court may reform in modern
    Extrinsic evidence allowed for patent ambiguity (blackacfe to sue black acre to bob)
    Latent ambiguity (my home , has two homes) ee allowed
19
Q

negative will terreoum clause

A

not allowed says someone cant have intestate share

terroem clause says cant have interest if challenge not allowed

20
Q

revocation by writing

A

if satisfies will formalities
By inconsistent subsequent will ( second one valid first revoked)

21
Q

By physical act

A

by burning tearing defacing destroying
Can’t revoke partial by physical

22
Q

By operation of law

A

unless will or divorce judgment divorce will relocate all provisions in wilL ( es spouse treated as predeceased
Remarriage will not revive provisions

23
Q

Of codicil

A

revoke of will kill col
Revoke of cod doesn’t kill will

24
Q

codocil

A

A codicil is a legal document used to make amendments or additions to an existing will without completely rewriting it.

25
Q

Revival

A

republication generally required
-A will may be republished by execution of a codicil that refers to the
revoked will.
– However, if a will was partially revoked by a codicil that is
subsequently revoked, a presumption arises that the testator intended
to reinstate the first will

26
Q

Incorporation by reference

A

writing may be incorporated to reference if exists at time of execution and will intends to incorporate and describes writing to id it

27
Q

acts of independent significance

A
28
Q
A