oral argument Flashcards

1
Q

may it please the court

A

my name is Patrick Perez and I am representing the petitioner defendant John hardy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

today we ask the court to reverse

A

the florida eleventh judicial circuit courts decision to deny the defendants motion to suppress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the appropriate standard of review

A

for a motion to suppress, as stated in pagan v state, is a mixed standard of review, the trial courts factual findings are reviewed for competent substantial evidence, but legal standards are reviewed in the de novo standard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the circuit court

A

improperly denied the defendant’s motion to suppress statements because the state violated Hardy’s constitutional rights by interrogating him in custody without reading him his Miranda warnings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in Miranda v Arizona

A

the Supreme Court required that any individual held for interrogation must be clearly informed of his or her rights, including the right to remain silent and that any statement he does make may be used as evidence against him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Oregon v mathiason states

A

these requirements arise when there have been such restriction on a persons freedom as to render him in custody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

informing persons of there Miranda rights

A

is also required under article 1 section 9 of the florida constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

as to determine whether an interrogation is custodial

A

ramirez v state explains that custody for purposes of miranda includes not only formal arrest but any restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with an actual arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ramirez also states

A

the standard for custody is based on whether in the totality of circumstances a reasonable person would feel that his freedom of movement has been restricted to the degree associated with an actual arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

in rameriez the florida Supreme Court

A

determined a four factor based test to determine whether a person would consider himself in custody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

these factors are

A

the manner in the police summon the suspect for questioning
the place purpose and manner of the interrogation
the extent to which the suspect is presented evidence of his or her guilt
and whether the suspect was informed if she was free to leave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly