What makes a criminal? Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Reasons for criminal behaviour

A
  • Brain dysfunction
  • Mental health issues
  • Addictions
  • Genetics
  • Surroundings (SLT)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Brunner’s Aim

A

Use gene linkage analysis to follow a single gene through a particular family to track a disorder and provide a genetic explanation for crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Brunner’s Sample

A

Large dutch family where many of the men had a history of criminal behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Brunner’s Procedure

A

Analysed urine samples over 24 hours, indicated enzyme production and any genetic mutations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Brunner’s Results

A

Mutated gene on the X chromosome lowering the production of MAO-A enzyme. This meant serotonin and adrenaline were not being broken down properly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What Brunner’s study suggested

A

Increased levels of serotonin and adrenaline linked to aggressive and deviant behaviours explaining crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Caspi’s Aim

A

To look into the effects of upbringing along with the decreased levels of MAO-A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Caspi’s Sample

A

500 male students from New Zealand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Caspi’s Results

A

Found that students who had low levels of MAO-A were significantly more likely to be antisocial, this was enhanced by a damaging environmental upbringing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Suggestions made after Caspi’s study

A

That there is an interaction between genes and the environment that determine aggressive behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Farrington’s Aim

A

Investigate whether problem families produce problematic children. Such as divorced parents and siblings with convictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Farrington’s Sample and Procedure

A

411 London boys aged 8 up until they were 46, longitudinal. The boys were interviewed as well as mothers and teachers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Farrington’s Results

A

Those who were more exposed to more problems became more problematic. He argued there to be a cumulative effect as individually had a small effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Farrington’s risk factors

A
  • Divorced Parents led to lack of a role model
  • Family with other convictions led to imitated behaviour
  • Poor eduction meant they can’t provide for themselves
  • Malnutrition means poor cognitive development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Farrington suggestions

A

That many environmental factors can lead to a prediction of criminal behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Farrington Pro’s

A
  • Longtidudinal so no individual differences
  • Large sample
  • Interactionist with parents and teachers
  • Ecologically valid
17
Q

Farrington Con’s

A
  • Low generalisability, androcentric
  • Ethnocentric
  • Reductionist
  • Social desirability bias
18
Q

Raine’s Aim

A

Analyse levels of brain dysfunction using PET scans of murders who have pleaded NGRI

19
Q

Raine’s Sample

A

41 murderers matched with 41 non murderers, based on age, gender and schizophrenia. Also kept drug free for 2 weeks. Was a quasi experiment.

20
Q

Raine’s Method

A

Used a PET scanner and injected harmless radioactive material. Asked to do continuous performance tasks for 32 minutes. The radioactive material bonds with glucose but its left behind after its used indicting patterns of activity.

21
Q

Prefrontal Cortex

A

Emotional expression, understanding implications in a situation

22
Q

Amygdala

A

Processes fear in the brain

23
Q

Parietal Cortex

A

Controls verbal ability and education levels

24
Q

Raine’s Results

A
  • Less activity in prefrontal cortex in murderers, less emotional expression
  • Less activity in parietal cortex meaning lower verbal ability
  • Less activity in the Amygdala so less able to process fear
25
Q

What Raine’s research suggested

A

That brain dysfunction may be a contributing factor to violent criminal behaviours.

26
Q

Pros of Raine’s research

A
  • High control of extraneous variables
  • Useful applications
  • Objective quantitate data
  • Standardised procedure
  • Ethical as its a quasi
27
Q

Con’s of Raines research

A
  • Taken of drugs could be ethical issue
  • Ecological validity
  • Socially sensitive
  • Lacks generalisability
  • Lacks qualitative data
  • Reductionist
28
Q

Application of Biological Strategies

A

Raine created a three part intervention programme based on Nutrition, Physical Exercise, Cognitive Stimulation. Found that intervention reduced crime by what he argued as 35%. Follow up study also showed omega 3 supplements reduced aggression.