What is it like to be a fly? Flashcards
Give a second way to categorise these theories of consciousness
Functionalist theories, They associate consciousness with particular functions:
•GNWT: access, attention, working memory, report
•HOTT: higher order thoughts, metacognition
•RPT: perceptual organisation, binding
IIT (and to some extent RPT) are structuralist theoriesThey associate consciousness with architecture
Why does IIT guy not like functionalist theories?
As he explained, one function can be carried out by various structural arrangements (e.g integrated or feedforward.)
What is meant by dualism?
Mind and body are different entities, different substances, with different properties.
Name and describe two forms of dualism
Interactionism- Mental and physical interact, e.g. via the pineal gland according to Descartes
Epiphenomenalism- Physical events cause mental events, but mental events have no effect on physical (brain) events (Libet experiments)
What is meant by monism?
Mind and body are the same entities, you can ‘translate’ one into the other
Describe two types of monism
Idealism, Solipsism
•There is only the mental, the physical is a mental imagination (as in the Matrix)
Physicalism, Materialism
•There is only the physical
•View most neuroscientists have
Name and describe four types of materialism
- Reductive materialism: all mental phenomena can be reduced to physical (e.g. brain) processes
- Eliminative materialism: Our notion of mental phenomena is flawed, they do not exist
- Behaviourism: Disregard all the mental, only look at behaviour
- Functionalism: mental phenomena can be realized in different physical structures (brains, computers, aliens), as long as they are analogously related to each other, to the external world, and to behavior
How did David Chalmers turn this discussion on its head?
He said we were focusing on the easy problem: the particularities of consciousness, and not the hard problem of consciousness: how we have consciousness or qualia at all? why aren’t these all carried out ‘in the dark’
What is meant by E.G in relevance to the hard problem?
The Explanatory Gap (E.G.): explaining the function does not explain the experience
The hard problem opens up the possibility of the existence of what theoretical entity? Describe these
philosophical zombies- These are functionally identical to normal humans, except they have no Qualia, no experience.
Who was the strongest opponent of this and what did they argue?
Daniel Dennett; consciousness is all about reactive dispositions (behavior)
What previous studies mentioned came close to the philosophical zombie? (2)
the behavior of monkey Helen showing ‘super blindsight’
Other examples would be the Milner and Goodale patient D.F. who was able to execute movements towards objects she didn’t see, or any other example of unconscious processing and reacting towards visual stimuli that are not seen, as in masking, CFS, blindsight, sleepwalking, etc
Why are these studies not proof of ‘real’ philosophical zombies?
In all these cases, the behaviour is not entirely normal, identical to, or as good as the conscious, unlesioned behaviour. No proof of ‘real’ philosophical zombies
Name and describe two other thought experiments that argue for Qualia
- Mary ‘the super color scientist’. She has no color experiences (e.g. she lives in a colorless world), yet knows everything there is to knowabout color processing, rods and cones, the brain etc. Now she leaves her seclusion, and suddenly, for the first time, sees, experiencescolor. Will she not have learned something new? > E.G.
- The inverted spectrum thought experiment. How can we ever know that what I see and report as red, is in someone else’s mind the same color? Maybe they experience my green, where I experience red. We all call these colors ‘red’, and assigns this color to apples, lights, tomatoes etc, but how do we know we experience the same?
What solution did Chalmers propose for the hard problem?
In its original form, the Hard Problem is (almost?) impossible to deal with inside materialism. Chalmers proposed a sort of dualist solution: the dual aspect theory of information, where information automatically is accompanied by experience (like matter is also energy)