Week five - regional and cohesion policy Flashcards
what are the two main theoretical frameworks for economic activity
1) neoclassical model
- effective functioning of the market leads to convergence
- self-correcting in the long-run
- economic policy should eliminate hurdles to factor mobility
2) agglomeration economies
- neoclassical theory of limited value
- development is accumulative
- economic policy should intervene to reduce divergence
the degree of agglomeration in economic activity depends on the magnitude of which two forces
- agglomeration forces: those the promote spatial concentration in economic activity
- dispersion forces: those that promote spatial dispersion in economic activity
example of something that causes spatial dispersion in economic activity
- transportation costs
- trade protectionism
what are the two main agglomeration forces
- abundant demand
- reduction in production costs
what are the implications of a reduction in protectionism and transport costs
- dominance of agglomeration forces
- divergence between advantaged regions and those less developed
is agglomeration stronger or weaker than dispersion
stronger (most developed centres have the advantage)
what are the arguments in favour of regional policy
- equity and solidarity: income redistribution and unemployment reduction
- political: social, territorial and political cohesion
- improve the coordination of national regional policies
- benefits of the economic activity of other regions
what are the main regional disparities in the EU
- less developed rural areas
- industrial decline: textile, coal, iron…
- congested areas
- border areas
- increase in disparities with the entry of Eastern countries
why has economic development been very uneven throughout the territory
- differences in physical characteristics and factor endowment
- external shocks
- government decisions
what are the five main stages of CRP in the EU
- phase 1 (1957-1974): Rome Treaty –> reconsider CRP after first enlargement
- phase 2 (1975-1987): creation of European Regional Development Fund
- phase 3 (1988-2006): consolidation of CRP (redistribution and cohesion policy/agenda 2020)
- phase 4 (2007-2013): relationship with growth and competitiveness objectives - renewed lisbon strategy
- phase 5 (2014-2020): relationship to 2020 strategy
what was the rome treaty’s relation to the CRP
- recognised that one of the objectives should be the promotion of harmonised economic activity
- emphasis on the creation of customs union
- no large inequalities between founding members
- confidence in the market as a mechanism that self-corrects
what were the two instruments for CRP in the Rome treaty from 1957-1974
- european social fund (ESF): objective to promote employment
- european investment bank (EIB): investment in less developed regions
what events increased the relevance of CRP between 1957-1974
- enlargement (UK and Ireland joined), economic crisis in 1973
- increasing concern for CRP
- thompson report (1973): uneven regional development, more emphasis should be put on reducing disparities, solving problems of rural areas and industrial restructuring
when was the creation of the european regional development fund and what is it
1975, to support regional policies of member states and budget instrument to support less developed regions and declining industrial areas
what increased the relevance of the CRP between 1975-1987
- the creation of the european regional development fund
- 1981: first report of the impact of the policies
- enlargements: Greece (1981) and Spain and Portugal (1986)