week 9 Flashcards
Finance and Probability Theory
o Finance Risk and return
o Return
Expected value in probability theory
Higher return the better
o Risk
Standard deviation in probability theory
Lower risk the better
o Do we really know/understand the probability of events that are associated with a certain financial product/an information event?
Are estimations based on the past? Rule of thumb? The law of large numbers?
St. Petersburg Paradox
o Using probability theory, the expected payoff is equal to 1 each turn
o Therefore, the rationality is to pay infinity to continue paying
o However, people are only willing to pay a finite amount to get an infinite payoff
o Utility maximizing individuals operating in their own self-interest are expected to buy the stocks they think are likely to produce the best risk-adjusted returns
o By the same token, they sell the others
o But
All relevant information is priced into the market
Prices change as new information is introduced
Investors respond to new information by buying and selling stocks affected by changing circumstances
In the process stocks are efficiently priced as the new information is discounted
Cognitive and emotional biases
o Cognitive biases arise from faulty reasoning and so can often be addressed through education and better information
o Emotional biases arise through intuition rather than conscious thought
Even though they are more difficult to cope with and almost impossible to completely eradicate in your own investment and trading
May be used to spot profitable opportunities if can be recognized from other investors
Think like a finance theorist or a trader
o Almost all investment and trading opportunities will have an element of behavioural finance to them
o Investors and traders tend to not argue this point, we look for opportunities
o A general consensus is that behavioural biases can contribute to market inefficiency in terms of
Overreaction and/or underreaction to new information
o Jegadeesh and Titman
Overreaction (to good or bad news) can lead to price reversal in the intermediate term
Underreaction can lead to price momentum
Monty Hall Judgement Error
o The host has to open a door and it has to be no car behind that door
o People refuse to accept the shift from an unconditional probability regime to a less intuitive conditional probability
o Subjects refuse to accept the validity of mathematical proofs offered to demonstrate the wisdom of switching doors
o Most subjects continue to refuse to switch doors
A study on market price
o If investors were rational and understood the nature of the Monty Hall problem, market prices to switch should be twice the levels of prices to retain original selections
o The study finds
Competition between only two rational investors out of many were necessary for market prices to reflect rational probabilities
Extension from Monty Hall
o Winning Trade
Stick with choosing Door A = winning trade
Winning trades are typically dependent on a large number of factors, with luck being the largest component
o Good Trade
Switch to Door C, still a good trade due to statistics
Better off with this good trade in the long run
Self- attribution
o A cognitive bias that leads people to attribute successful outcomes to their own skill but blame unsuccessful outcomes on bad luck
o Arises when investors are on a good run
Attribute profits to skills and edges in information, where it is much more likely that it has been lucky
o Dangerous
If unable to perceive our errors as errors, we cannot learn from them
Crediting lucky outcomes to skill leads to overconfidence and undiversified portfolio
o Solid statistical post-trade analysis is the best defense against this bias
Confirmation bias
o Cognitive bias whereby one tends to notice and look for information that confirms one’s existing beliefs, ignoring anything that contradicts those beliefs
o Emphasize confirming evidence and downplay contradictory evidence
Overconfidence
o A cognitive bias that manifests as an unreasonable belief in one’s abilities
o One of the worst biases an investor can have
o Leads to
Poorly diversified portfolios
Excessive trading in both position and volume
Underestimating the risks associated with extreme moves
Disposition effect
o Describes a desire for investors to realize gains by selling stocks that have appreciated, but to delay the realization of losses
Loss aversion and prospect theory
o Loss aversion
Cognitive bias that people dislike losses and disadvantages more than gains and advantages
Get-even
• Hold onto bad investments until they get even
Prospect theory
o Inadequacy of utility theory as a description of how people actually make financial decisions
o Find empirically that people underweight outcomes that are merely probability in comparison with outcomes that are obtained with certainty
Endowment effect
o An emotional bias that the value of a good increases when it becomes a part of a person’s endowment
o This effect causes losses or what is given up to weigh more heavily in the decision-making process than gains or what is acquired
o Different from loss aversion
Endowment effect – ownership creates satisfaction
Loss aversion – people are more motivated by avoiding a loss than acquiring a similar gain
o May explain
investors’ reluctance to sell their under-performing stocks to capture tax write-offs
Underreaction to news
Exacerbate momentum effects in stock prices