week 8 Flashcards
Investment Cycle
o Asset Allocation
o Portfolio Construction
o Implementation
o Portfolio Attribution
o Asset Allocation
Distributing investment dollars across stocks, bonds, cash and other investment vehicles in order to achieve a target level of return within a specified level of risk exposure and tolerance
o Portfolio Construction
Selecting the actual instruments to hold in each asset classes
o Implementation
Selecting an appropriate broker/dealer
Execution
Now inc. specification algorithms and algorithmic trading rules
o Portfolio Attribution
Performance analysis
• Evaluate performance of the fund to distinguish between market movement and skilled decision-making ability
Transaction Cost Analysis
Difficult to measure trading costs independent of investment decisions
Why Transaction Cost Analysis
o For buy side traders; to determine whether brokers are working effectively on their behalf
o To confirm they are getting value for their brokerage commissions
o To determine whether
they should be trading more or less aggressively
Trading aggressively leads to different transaction costs
o To better understand why they are competing with other traders who are trading on the same information
o To inform their portfolio managers about liquidity conditions in various securities
Evaluating Investment portfolio Performance
o Measure the increase in asset or portfolio value relative to the initial asset value during a given time frame o Returns can be measured Dollar-weighted return Time-weighted average return Need to think of portfolio
o Returns adjusted by or compared to a relevant benchmark
o Refers to stock selection, based on these ratios we will evaluate the stock performance
Sharpe ratio
Treynor Ratio
Jensen Measure
Evaluating Investment Portfolio Performance
o Market timing refers to the ability of the investor to shift their portfolio’s betas
o Suppose we have a risk-free asset and risky asset
Market downturn -> allocate more money in the risk-free asset
• Shifting returns closer to Rf
Market upswing -> more money allocated into the risky asset
• Increase portfolio beta
Ways to examine market timing
o Quadratic variable approach Increase the beta when the market is good, decrease when its bad Yg is expected to be positive o Dummy Variable approach D=1 when its in a bad market
Do we expect gamma q to be negative when the market is bad?
• Quadratic variable approach
Expect gamma q to be negative in a positive market
Transaction cost components
o Explicit costs Contractual costs which include • Brokerage commissions • Clearing and settlement cost • Taxes / stamp duties Easiest to measure
o Implicit costs Price effects • Bid/ask spreads • Market impacts Hard to measure
o Missed trade opportunity costs
Informed traders lose profits when their orders go unfilled
Unfilled orders may also hurt uninformed traders
Hard to measure
o To measure these costs, need to estimate the price without the trade occurring
Two approaches
o Benchmark comparison
Difference between the benchmark price and traded price
Benchmark price: arrival price, VWAP, close price and others
Many different benchmark prices
o Implementation shortfall
Most effective means of measuring transaction costs
Involves assessing the impact of trading on portfolio returns by computing the difference between the net returns on a paper portfolio and those on a real portfolio
o Looking at these two, they are essentially the same as it is comparing two prices
A general transaction cost measurement framework
o Difference between the trade price and a price benchmark may contain information about transaction cost
o For a buy
TC/Unit = TP-BP
o For a sell
TC/unit = BP-TP
o The ideal price benchmark would estimate the price that would have been observed if not for the trade
Your trade is not included
No one can confidently specify a price not including your trade
Common Price Benchmarks
o Arrival price – spread midpoint at the time of trade
o VWAP – Average price around the trade
o Closing or opening prices
The Spread Midpoint Benchmark Price
o Estimate the benchmark price by the average of the bid and ask at the time of the trade
o Refers to the arrival price
The cost of a buy at the ask (or a sell at the bid) is one half of the spread
o Issue: the spread midpoint benchmark does not indicate whether the trade is well timed
o Doesn’t necessarily show that you traded at a better price
o Other issues
Large orders may require many trades between which quotes typically trade
Total transaction cost will be underestimated if a different midpoint benchmark is used for each trade
Brokers may defer the trade until it can be done when the spread is narrow
• May end up with worse trade price for the investor
Volume-weighted average price
o The price benchmark is the volume-weighted average price for the day of the trade
o Negative transaction cost in this scenario with vwap shows positive returns
You are trading at a lower price than the average traded price for the day
o Advantages
Simple summary statistic of all trades in a day
Transaction cost measure can be computed from volume-weighted average cost trade confirmations
o Issues
If you are the only buyer (or seller) in the interval
• Transaction cost estimate is zero
The selection/implementation decomposition is burred
• Momentum traders estimate positive costs
• Contrarian traders estimate negative costs
Inherent drawbacks of VWAP
• Trading strategy induces it to be positive/negative if you are a momentum/contrarian trader