week 9 Flashcards

1
Q

play

A
  • activities that children engage in for their inherent enjoyment
  • enjoyable, active, voluntary
  • solitary or social
  • essential part of development
  • child centred play therapy (CCPT)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

parten’s classification of children’s social play

A
  • non social vs social
  • allows us to understand the development of play across early childhood
  • believes solitary play = less complex than social play
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

non social types of play
unoccupied

A
  • briefly watches things ands turns away
  • not engaging
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

non social types of play
onlooker

A
  • watching another child play
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

non social types of play
solitary

A
  • not paying attention to others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

social types of play
parallel play

A
  • alongside each other but not engaging with each other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

social types of play
associative play

A
  • same task together
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

social types of play
cooperative play

A
  • peers, organized activity goal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

peers

A
  • people of approx same age and status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

friend

A
  • individuals that have intimate, reciprocated and positive relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

children’s choice of friendships

A
  • similarity
  • temperament
  • interests
  • emotions
  • behaviour
  • level of cognitive development
  • proximity (less important with age)
  • gender
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

developmental changes in friendship
12-18 months

A
  • show preference to some than others, reaching out
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

developmental changes in friendship
24 months

A
  • imitating peers social behaviours
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

developmental changes in friendship
3-4 years

A
  • make and maintain friendships
  • same gender play preferences
  • able to identify best friend
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

developmental changes in friendship
5-8 years

A
  • better communicate with friends vs non friends
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

developmental changes in friendship
9 years

A
  • more sensitive to treatment of others
  • friends = peers that take care of others needs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

developmental changes in friendship
adolescence

A
  • more important, spend more time with peers, increased reliance
  • intimacy, self disclosure
18
Q

selman (1980)

A
  • age related changes in children’s friendships are tied to qualitative shifts in perspective taking abilities, jump not gradual
  • piaget, thinking of others, beyond their own needs
19
Q

role of internet and social media in friendships

A
  • social media, texting important for modern day interactions/friendships
  • greater anonymity, less emphasis on physical appearance (sometimes)
  • more control over interactions
  • finding similar peers
  • 24/7 access
20
Q

perspectives on use of technology

A

rich get richer
- good social skills, benefit from technology
- existing friends maintaining/ enhancing

social compensation
- social media is valuable for lonely/shy/less adjusted people

21
Q

jean m twenge

A
  • internet and social media impacts mental health
  • online not as satisfying as in person, not a direct substitute
  • decrease in in person interaction, increase loneliness
22
Q

effects of friendships

A
  • support and validation
  • buffer against unpleasant experiences
  • helps develop social skills and positive relationships with other people
23
Q

potential costs of friendships/negative peer interactions

A
  • hard to determine who is influencing who
  • aggression/disruptiveness
  • alcohol/substance abuse
  • bullying and victimization
24
Q

peer socialization hypothesis

A
  • peers lead an individual adolescent to change their behaviour
25
Q

peer selection hypothesis

A
  • adolescents actively choose friends who engage in the same behaviour
26
Q

cyberbullying

A
  • intentional and repeated harassment/mistreatment of someone through digital devices
  • physical appearance/gender/ sexuality (33% higer) etc
  • 46% at least once, more girls than boys
  • peaks in middle school
27
Q

gender differences friendships

A

girls
- closeness and dependency
- worry about abandonment/loneliness
- more upset than boys when a friend betrays
- more likely to co ruminate

boys and girls less likely to differ
- amount of conflict
- recreational opportunities

gender atypical
- more difficulties forming friendships

28
Q

sociometric status

A
  • measures peer acceptance
  • degree to which children are liked/disliked by their peers as a group
  • popular
  • rejected
  • neglected
  • average
  • controversial
29
Q

general determinants of status

A
  • physical attractiveness
  • athleticism
  • status of friends
  • social behaviour
  • personality
  • cognitions about others
  • goals when interacting with peers
30
Q

popular children

A
  • accepted and impactful, high status
  • socially skilled, cooperative, friendly, sociable, helpful, sensitive to others
  • generally possess more emotional and behavioural strengths
  • above average in aggression, aggression to achieve goals
31
Q

rejected children

A
  • liked by few, disliked by many
  • difficulty in finding constructive solutions to social situations
  • anxious, depressed, lower behavioural competence
  • possibly less developed theory of mind (other peoples feelings)
  • can be overly aggressive, withdrawn
32
Q

aggressive rejected children

A
  • prone to physical aggression, disruptive, delinquency, negative behaviour (hostility, threatening)
  • socially withdrawn, timid
33
Q

withdrawn rejected children

A
  • socially withdrawn, wary, timid, socially anxious
  • victimized by peers, lonely, isolated, depressed
34
Q

neglected children

A
  • withdrawn from peers, socially competent
  • less sociable/disruptive than average children, avoid aggression
  • as socially competent as popular children
35
Q

controversial children

A
  • high in impact, average in preference, equally liked and disliked
  • characteristics of popular and unpopular children
  • aggressive, disruptive, prone to anger, cooperative, sociable, humorous
36
Q

cross cultural similarities

A
  • socially rejected, aggressive and disruptive
  • popular = prosocial, leadership
  • peers reject withdrawn children
  • different cultures encourage different behaviour
37
Q

role of parents in children’s peer relationships

A
  • monitoring/coaching
  • indirect via interactions with their children
  • early parent child interactions linked to children’s peer interactions later on
  • security of parent child relationship linked to quality of peer relationships
  • harsh parenting linked to unpopular children + victimization
38
Q

secure attachment

A
  • anticipate positive interactions, easy engagement with peers
  • responsive caregiver, reciprocity and empathy
  • self regulation, confidence, enthusiasm, friendliness
39
Q

insecure attachment

A
  • negatively impact competence with peers
  • struggle to regulate emotions, inconsistent+rejected behaviour from parents
  • lack of emotional guidance
40
Q

role of parents for shaping peer relationships (active)
monitoring

A

young children
- orchestrating and monitoring their interactions with peers

elementary school children
- allowing engagement in social and extracurricular activities

adolescence
- knowing where and with who child is with

41
Q

role of parents for shaping peer relationships (active)
coaching

A
  • teaching strategies for gaining entry to a group of peers
  • suggestions on what to say
42
Q

peer stress, parent support, children depression

A
  • high peer stress, low parental support = high levels of depressive symptoms
  • high parental support = no change in depressive symptoms, stable, buffer