Week 8 Crowd Management (Exam 2)

Question 1

Crowd Management

Answer 1

techniques used to manage lawful public assemblies before, during and after the event for the purpose of maintaining their lawful status

Question 2

Litigation Claims of Negligence

Answer 2

n

Question 3

Determinant of Negligence?

Answer 3

Foreseeability
•Reasonable anticipation that harm or injury is a likely result from certain acts or omissions (Garner, 2004)
•Managers should anticipate rather than react
•Protect invitees

Question 4

Foreseeable steps to take? (4)

Answer 4

Hiring of Personnel
Facility Design
Supervision
Training

Question 5

Sanders v. Nebraska St. University

Answer 5

Who won? Mrs. Sanders
Do you agree with the court decision? Yes. No one expects to get trampled and security should’ve been beefed up
What could have Nebraska State University have done to prevent this case from going to court? Beefed up security or made a deal with Mrs. Sanders to compensate her

Question 6

What is negligence? (Sanders v. Nebraska St. Uni.)

Answer 6

failing to regulate crowd management in the end zone seating area

Question 7

Peer-group security

Answer 7

Part‐time employees to provide basic crowd management
service.
Typically people of the same general age, physical appearance, or cultural background

Question 8

4th Amendment Concerns (3)

Answer 8

State action
Considered a search
Reasonable