Week 7 - Mintzbergs Theories Flashcards
Summarise Mintzberg’s design
Organisational structure should achieve internal harmony in the context of the org’s situation. Ie: consider internal & external environments.
Mintzberg discusses 4 flows
parts
mechanisms of co-ordination
design parametres
contingncy factors.
List & draw Mintzberg’s 5 parts of an org
Strategic apex: top-level executives in organisation
Middle line: managers who connect the strategic apex to the operation core (middle managers, forepersons, supervisors)
Operating core: employees who do the work in producing the organisation’s products/services
Techno-structure: organisation specialists responsible for standardising various aspects of the organisation’s activities. (accountants, schedulers, planners).
Support staff: employees and departments which provide indirect support services to the organisation.
(It, payroll).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78f68/78f68ddecca1ee8d05291c41e6f54d9cd5726626" alt=""
List Mintzbergs mechanisms of co-ordination
SS(WOS)M
- Mechanisms of co-ordination - How various tasks can be coordinated to achieve organisation objectives efficiently:
- supervision
- standardisaton of work – work procedures
- standardisation of outputs – performance measures
- standardisation of skills – professionals or skilled trade
- mutual adjustment – employees coordinate own work usually through information communication
List Mintzbergs design parametres
SFCGAL
Design parameters – vary according to different configurations of the parts
Specialisation
Formalisation
Centalisation
Group / size
Action plan & performance
Liaison
List Mintzbergs contingency factors
ASTEP
Contingency factors – external environmental influences
Age
Size
Tehcnical systems
Environment
Power
What are Mintzbergs typologies?
According to Mintzberg each part of an org exerts a pull, in the right conditions typical types of organisations are made
Discuss the simple structure
SoSCY
Simple Structure
Part – strategic apex
Co-ordinates – supervision
Design – centralised
Seen in – smaller / younger orgs or those in crisis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/796b6/796b6a7c7535149a1d9f750157e369dfed4282f6" alt=""
Discuss the machine bureaucracy
ToWFoL
Machine Bureaucracy
Part – technostructure
Co-ordinates – standardisation of work practices
Design – formal, centralised, limited horizontal decentralisation
Seen in – older, larger, stable orgs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ec51/2ec511250e7a34e85a44ff632ca8a12fb79c4f9b" alt=""
Discuss the professional bureacracy
OSDoC
Professional Bureaucracy
Part – operating core
Co-ordinates – standardisation of skills through training & design
Design – decentralised
Seen in – complex & stable environments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c6c/34c6c64953cbb13a2de4804b7b1818e726b42b5d" alt=""
Discuss the divisionalised form
MOMoLM
Divisionalised form
Part – middle line (balkanise)
Co-ordinate – standardiseing of outputs & performance controls
Design – market based units with independent authority
Seen in – larger mature orgs in diversified markets
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0e98/c0e9810e1a8028e48cc575034b37f4cb041fee5f" alt=""
Discuss the adhocracy
SMoDoC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19aba/19aba836be78d578ec657b8fe25fe2fe3c6ce837" alt=""
Adhocracy
Part – support staff
Co-ordinate – mutual adjustment, open collaboration based on skills
Design – decentralised, small units in matrix structure, highly organic
Seen in – complex, dynamic orgs. Sophisticated & automated