Week 7 - Hip/SIJ/Lx differentiation Flashcards

1
Q

what is included in the interview

A
• Body chart
– Area, quality and type of symptoms
• Current and past history
• Behaviour of Symptoms
– Aggravating v Easing factors – 24hr pattern
• Special Questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lx as the source of pain

A

• Any innervated structure can produce local and referred pain:
– Varied distribution that does not follow a definitive pain map = somatic pain
– Can refer as far as the ankle, but typically not below the knee.
– Upper lumbar vs lower lumbar intracapsular (McCall et al 1979)
– Central pain may be less suggestive of z-joint as the source (Schwarzer et al 1994)
• Injury to the nerve roots:
– Evokes radicular pain into the lower limb resembles
dermatomal distribution= radicularpain
– Considered when LBP projects below knee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lx as the location of pain

A

• SIJ and hip can refer into the Lx region, though rarely:
• E.g. Sembrano and Polly (2008)
– 85% from the Lx spine
– 14.5% from the SIJ
– 12.5% from the hip joint
• Also consider visceral and non- MSK sources of referral into the Lx (e.g. kidney, gall bladder)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

SIJ as the source of pain

A

• Fortin et al (1994)
• MostcommonlyoverPSISextendingcaudallyandlaterally
• Slipman et al (2000)
• 94%reportedbuttockpain
• 72%reportedlowerlumbar(belowiliaccrest) • 14%reportedgroinpain
• 6%reportedupperlumbarpain
• Fukui et al (2002) • 100%overPSIS
• 68.7%medialbuttock
• 37.5%overGtrochandlatthigh • 31.2%posteriorthigh
• 9.3%inthegroin
Key points:
Composite drawings of pain maps from Dreyfuss et al (2004)
• Variable; commonly localised PSIS and rarely past the knee or above L4/L5
• Unilateral:bilateral pain = 4:1 (Vleeming et al 1990)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hip joint as a source of pain

A

• Lesher et al (2008)
– 71% reported buttock pain
– 57% reported thigh pain
– 55% reported groin pain
– Only 2% reported knee pain (?)
– No patient reported lower lumbar spine referral
Key points:
• Potentially refer within the L3 dermatome or sclerotome.
• Similar referral patterns to the Lx and SIJ studies, but very rarely refers into the lower lumbar region.
• Most commonly presents as groin and/or buttock pain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Paraesthesia and anaesthesia

A

• More suggestive of Lx involvement (i.e. radiculopathy)
• Also consider local peripheral nerve entrapments
– e.g. meralgia paraesthetica - sensory changes only (does not cross thigh midline), worse standing/walking etc.
• SIJ dysfunction has been associated with neural symptoms (? Linked to Lx changes or inc. mechanosensitivity of the sciatic nerve)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

clicking, giving way or catching

A

• May be useful in terms of location aggs/eases & other symptoms etc.
• Examples…
– Acetabular labral tear – sharp catch pain with hip flexion/rotation associated with a deep click
– Segmental Lx instability – ‘feeling of giving way’ or catching through range during F/E
– SIJ hypermobility – clicking sensation in groin with unilateral LL loading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Low back pain stats

A
  • ~ 70-80% will experience an episode of back pain in their life and ~ 5-20% during a single year (Rubin, 2007)
  • ~ 30% will have a reoccurrence within 6 months (Cassidy et al., 2005)
  • ~ 80% of these episodes will be mild (Cassidy et al., 2005)
  • In the majority of LBP cases the source will be in the Lx
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SIJ as the source of LBP

A

~ 15% (13-30%) of people with (?chronic) back pain have SIJ as the pain generator (Foley et al 2006)
• ~ 50% of people with SIJ pain there was a history of trauma (Foley et al., 2006)
• ~ 20% of pregnant women develop pain attributable to the SIJ (Vleeming et al., 2007)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hx questions related to Lx

A

Mechanism of Injury:
• What was the position of the lumbar spine and how does this influence the loading pattern and predispose to certain patterns of injury?
• What other forces were involved e.g. internal (↑ IAP – valsalva, cough, sneeze) or external (blunt trauma)?
• Sustained vs cumulative loading
Consider a gradual onset of symptoms:
• Degenerative, spondyloarthropathies (e.g. scheuermann’s), non- mechanical
Consider the time of day:
• IVD demonstrate higher water content in the morning (? more susceptible to compressive injury)
Consider the progression of symptoms after MOI:
• Initially ok then gradual build up after the initial event – .e.g. Lx radiculopathy
Is the CHx suggestive of loading/injury to the Lx?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hx questioning related to SIJ

A

• May be of gradual or sudden onset
• Sudden onset most commonly associated with trauma (~50%)
– Fall onto buttock (consider forces thru Lx)
– Missed step/stairs or missed kick
– Lift and twist with unilateral loading of LL
• Gradual onset
– Athletes:
• Repeated unilateral and torsional loading e.g. kicking, throwing sports, figure skating
– Pregnancy related pelvic pain ~20% (Vleeming et al (2008)
– Spondyloarthropathies (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis)
– Stress fractures rare but possible
Is the CHx suggestive of loading/injury to the SIJ?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hx questioning Hip jt

A

Sudden onset due to trauma:
– Sudden compressive loading of hip joint e.g. fall onto knee or hip, or sudden take-off
– Twisting on planted foot
– Hyperextension + ER
Gradual onset due to repetitive microtrauma:
– Chronic labral injury - running, repeated hip flexion/add (e.g. running, kicking, tackles)
– Femoral neck stress fractures – fatigue loadingIs the CHx suggestive of loading/injury to the hip?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

consider past Hx

A

Recall high recurrency rates of LBP and risk of chronicity
Consider congenital abnormalities (e.g. CHD, Perthe’s)
Consider previous surgery (e.g. laminectomy or SCFE repair)
Consider previous pregnancy and birth history
Consider previous injuries
– E.g. recurrent ankle injury may alter running biomechanics and contribute to lateral hip pain
– E.g. old pubic rami fracture may contribute to SIJ dysfunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

lumbar spine agg factors

A

Increase IAP e.g. cough/sneeze
Bending forward or lifting Prolonged sitting
Rising from a chair
Uphills > down hills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

lumbar spine eas factors

A

Lying prone or contralateral sidelying

Standing/walking (short periods)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

SIJ dysfunction agg factors

A

Ipsilateral WB + loading Ipsilateral sidelying Walking/running (stance > swing)/stairs
Prolonged sitting Rising from chair Rolling in bed

17
Q

SIJ dysfunction eas factors

A

Contralateral WB
Sitting with contralateral WB Contralateral sidelying
Rest

18
Q

Hip jt (eg. labral tear) agg factors

A

Pivoting, twisting, changing directions in WB

Prolonged sitting Rising from chair Ipsilateral sidelying Walking up stairs, hills

19
Q

hip jt eas factors

A

Flat straight line walk ok Contralateral sidelying

20
Q

special questions

A
Cord/ Cauda Equina
 Medications – analgesics? steroid use?
 Investigations – what? result?
 General health
– Surgery,pregnancy,malignancies
 Weight loss, appetite loss, lethargy/malaise
 Family history
– E.g. Inflammatory arthropathies (RA, psoariatic arthritis)
Autonomicsequelae–sweating,tempΔ,BP,HR
– discitis, meningitis
– visceral pain
• urogenital disorders
• appendix (stomach + groin)
• uterus, ovaries, testes (sacral pain)
21
Q

check 24 hr pattern

A

slide 15

22
Q

hypothesis testing

what region is the most likely source?

A

Investigate the region(s) thoroughly to find a comparable sign (e.g. palpate, AROM, PROM, special tests)
“what findings do you expect to see that would fit your hypothesis?”

23
Q

hypothesis testing

what region is the least likely source

A
Superficial investigation (e.g. quick/clearance tests)
 Is the area a contributing factor? – assess at a later date – “Regional interdependence” (Wainner, 2004)
 May investigate more thoroughly if your findings did not fit with your hypothesis – it’s an evolving process
24
Q

Observation : standing
includes looking at muscle bulk
posture
palpation of bony landmarks

A

Muscle bulk
– gluteal atrophy common in chronic hip pain – segmental multifidis wasting in CLBP
– buttock gripping in SIJ hypermobility
• Posture
– Weight distribution – unloading due to pain or weakness (not that helpful)
– Antalgic posture – e.g. list (+/- flexion) suggestive of Lx pathology
– Hip Rotation – e.g. advanced hip OA in held in ER
– Coxa and genu valgum/varus – ? contribution to hip pathology
• Palpation of bony landmarks
– Iliac crest heights, ASIS/ PSIS levels - Linked to SIJ dysfunction (? reliability)

25
Q
Active mvmts in standing
includes gait
functional tests eg. squat, STS, rolling
lumbar spine 
SIJ
A
Gait
– Stance: Hip E + Lx E + Ant innom rotation (sacrum nutated)
– Swing: Hip F + Lx F + post innom rotation (relative nutation)
– Trendelenburg sign: Hip > SIJ >> Lx
– Externally rotated leg: Hip > SIJ >>Lx
– Others.....?
• Functional tests – squat, sit to stand, rolling – How useful are these to differentiate regions?
• Lumbar spine
– AROM → combined → quadrant
– Structural differentiation??
• SIJ
– Gillet’s, Forward Flexion test
26
Q

Sitting

A
Observations
– How can and can’t they sit comfortably?
• Lumbar spine
– Neurodynamic test - slump
• SIJ
– Forward flexion test (mobility not pain)
• Hip
– Hamstringlength-AKE(Slump?)
– HipIRandER
– MMT – hip F/ER/IR and knee E
– Modified Thomas test - ? How useful
27
Q

supine

A
Lumbar Spine
• Neurological examination
• Neurodynamic tests – passive SLR
SIJ
• Alignment: ASIS, pubic tubercles, medial malleolus
• Provocation tests (Laslett et al 2002)
• Mobility tests - Arthrokinematic and osteokinematic glides
• Stability tests - Active SLR +/- compression - mod sensitivity, high specificity in PRPP (Vleeming et al 2008)
Hip Joint
• AROM/PROM
• PAMs
• Quadrant, Special Tests
• M Length
28
Q

side lying

A
• Palpation
– Hip muscles, Gtroch etc
• Lumbarspine – PPIVMs
– Neurodynamic test – sidelying slump
• SIJ
– Provocation test - compression – Arthrokinematic glides
• Hipjoint – MMT
– Muscle length
29
Q

prone

A
Palpation
• Alignment: PSIS, SS, ILA, IT
• Muscle bulk: multifidus, gluteals, piriformis, ES • SIJ ligaments: LDL and STL
– High specificity in PRPP and moderate reliability (Vleeming et al 2008)
Lumbar spine:
• PAIVMs
SIJ
• Sacral PA (sacral thrust test)
Hip
• AROM/PROM: E, IR, ER • MMT–HipE
• Muscle length - PKB
30
Q

SIJ provocation tests

A

Sensitivity and specificity for three or more positive SIJ tests were 94% and 78%, respectively

31
Q

hypothesis testing and prioritising in your examination

A

• Deep investigation of the most likely region(s) – locate a comparable sign
– You may have two regions ∴ prioritise those tools that will most help you differentiate the regions or decide on management (e.g. referral for investigation)
– Remember palpation!
• Superficial investigation of the least likely regions – ruling out/screening a region
– May be in the form of clearing tests or AROM + OP
– May need to include later in your assessment – i.e. contributing factors
– May need to revisit secondary hypotheses

32
Q

consider

A

there may be two unrelated and primary regional sources
– the notion of “Regional interdependence” in normal and abnormal systems
– the response to treatment ~ extremely useful and often overlooked diagnostic tool
• Re-assess….re-assess……re-assess
• E.g. if you PAIVM the Lx you expect a change in your * signs (better or worse) – if there is no change what could that suggest?

33
Q

Subjective examination

key indications Lx is the primary source

A

“…think horses”
• Location of pain not that helpful, however upper Lx pain more suggestive of Lx source
• Dermatomal pattern of pain and sensory changes more suggestive of Lx
• MOI and aggs/ease can be useful – but break them down!

34
Q

objective examination

key indications Lx is the primary source

A

Abnormal Lx motion tests (AROM)
• Abnormal PPIVMs
• Positive provocation tests (palpation, PAIVMs)
• Neurological examination supports radiculopathy
• Lack of Hip / SIJ signs
• Muscle wasting (segmental multifidis)

35
Q

subjective examination

key indications that SIJ is the primary source

A

Location of pain most commonly over PSIS and buttock – rarely refers above L4/5 or below the knee
• Trauma and pregnancy most common aetiology – Also consider spondyloarthropathies

36
Q

Objective examination

key indications that SIJ is the primary source

A

Abnormal SIJ motion tests (Gillet’s, FFT, osteo/arthro glides)
• Abnormal stability and load transference tests (ASLR and Gillet’s)
• Positive provocation and palpation tests (esp. over PSIS)
• Lack of Hip/Lx signs
– Esp. normal PAIVMs

37
Q

Key indicators of Hip as the primary source

subjective examination

A

Most commonly presents with groin and/or buttock pain, rarely refers into Lx (isolated knee not to be missed)
• Traumatic MOI common in acute pain – twisting in WB
• Clicking is commonly reported (?painful)

38
Q

Key indicators of hip as the primary source

objective examination

A
Muscle wasting (inferior Gmax and Gmed)
• Abnormal hip AROM and PROM
• Fabers and Quadrant – sensitive tests
• Gait signs
• Lack of Lx/SIJ signs