Week 7 Everything Flashcards
Relevant costs and relevant revenues
Relevant costs (revenues) are expected future costs (revenues) that differ among the alternative courses of action being considered.
To be relevant a cost (revenue) item must meet the following two criteria:
It must be an expected future cost (revenue) – it must occur in the future
Decision should be about selecting a course of action based on its expected future results
It must differ among alternative courses of action
If they do not differ, then they will not matter and will have no bearing on the decision making
Irrelevant costs
If costs and revenues are not relevant then they are said to be irrelevant. Irrelevant costs and revenues will not be affected by decisions. They are the same irrespective of which decision is made.
Types of irrelevant costs:
Historic (past or sunk) costs
Unavoidable (committed or common) costs
Non-cash costs (such as depreciation)
Historic (sunk) costs
Historic (sunk) costs are past costs (i.e. have been incurred prior to a decision point) and therefore unavoidable and cannot be changed no matter what action is taken. They are only useful to estimate the trend of future costs. an example is the book value of an equipment.
Qualitative factors are
Difficult to measure accurately in numerical terms
Are just as important as quantitative factors even though they are difficult to measure.
The concept of relevant costs and relevant revenues are used for special studies such as:
Special selling price decisions.
Product-mix decisions when capacity constraints exist
Decisions on replacement of equipment.
Outsourcing (Make or buy) decisions.
Discontinuation decisions.
The main question related with special pricing
Special pricing decisions involve one-time only orders and/or orders below the contemporary market prices. As special orders are only one-time orders, they cannot be priced using market prices. In this context, the main question that is related with decision making is:
When an offer price is below the total cost of manufacturing, should the company accept or reject it?
Decision making regarding special orders
Decisions on special orders should be made based on relevant costs. Irrelevant costs should be excluded from decision making, as their effect will be same under both accept and reject options. For example, fixed costs would not be affected by the order, so they should not be taken into consideration during the decision making.
In the special pricing context:
opportunity cost should also be taken into consideration
Opportunity cost should also be taken into consideration because it represents the best alternative way in which an organisation may have used its resources had it not made the decision it did.
Limiting factor
In the short term, sales demand may be in excess of production capacity. For e.g., Output may be restricted by shortage of skilled labour, materials, equipment or space.
The resources responsible for limiting the output are known as limiting factors. Within a short time period, it may be unlikely to acquire additional resources of the limiting factors.
The main question regarding allocation of scare resources
When there is a limiting production factor, how should managers choose which of the multiple products to produce?
When there is a limiting production factor, how should managers choose which of the multiple products to produce?
Objective is to maximise contribution margin for the firm.
Objective is to maximise contribution margin for the firm.
Therefore, the decision rule is:
Select the products/services that yield the highest contribution margin per unit of the constraining or limiting resource. When multiple constraints exist, optimisation techniques such as linear programming can be used in making decisions.
In this process we also need to take into consideration the sales demand for each product.
The irrelevance of past costs
Another area in decision making where relevant costs should be taken into consideration is making decisions of equipment replacement. In this case, making decisions based on written-down value may lead to inaccurate outcomes. Some costs, such as the original purchase cost of the old machine, its written down value and depreciation are irrelevant for decision-making.