week 7 Flashcards

1
Q

what is a cooperative strategy

A

is a strategy which independent firms choose to work together to achieve a shared objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how do firms create a cooperative strategy

A

Firms create a cooperative strategy through forming strategic alliances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

strategic alliance

A

A strategic alliance is a cooperative strategy in which firms combine some of their resources and capabilities in attempt to create a competitive advantage
For strategic alliances to be formed and carry on, they must benefit every side involved
In other words, strategic alliances are mutually lucrative partnerships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why would spotify want to get into a strategic alliance with Hulu

A

most of spotifys competitors offer streaming platforms , spotify was missing
Spotify was not able to match the bundles that amazon and apple were able to put out
To match what competitors were doing, spotify found a partner that could help it compensate for what it was missing and match competitors , mulitpoint competition

Hulu: got into an alliance with spotify, but they have multiple partners
Hulu wanted to gain market share and gain customers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why does hulu want a strategic alliance with Spotify

A

What does hulu want→ gets spotifys customer base, spotify customers have to create an account
Spotify is the market share leader, was a chance for hulu to acquire customers and upsell them for more services and monetize these customers they got from spotify

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How else can spotify get these results without forming an alliance

A

spotify could of bought hulu (acquire), spotify could also create their own video streaming services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

if spotify acquires hulu

A

would cost them a lot more money, spotify is not very cash rich, integration challenges with combining two firms together because of a lot of integration needed, outside of spotify’s area of expertise (video streaming),

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

creating from scratch

A

ery expensive, wouldn’t have resources, would take a lot of time, but getting into alliance it speeds things up and can match apples bundle, they dont have knowledge or a brand name in streaming would need to invest a lot in marketing, unknown outcomes→ may be bad outcome, alliance is more certain less risky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why would sprint want to partner with hulu

A

Economies of scope, multipoint competition, more consumers
Sprint has its own competition within the US, by offering video streaming its a way to lure customers away from competition, which is why sprint would agree to this partnership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

disadvantages of alliances

A

No guarantee for an alliance, can get broken up if one company feels like its not in their best interesting, mutual agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

why form strategic alliances

A

By forming alliances, firms can gain access to resources and capabilities they dont possesses internally
Firms can enter multiple alliances with different partners for dif purposes: creating a portfolio of ongoing alliances
Alliances don’t require a large investment like m&a, dont have the same integration challenges and are not permanent
While some alliances last for a long time, most are short lived and cease to exist as soon as participating firms no longer gain value from the alliance
For firms to enter into an alliance, it must be lucrative for all sides

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

differences between mergers and alliances

A

When companies merge, the parent companies integrate into one, in an alliance parent companies are separate entities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

types of strategic alaicnws

A

joint venture, equity alliance, non equity alliance,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

joint venture

A

A legally independent company created by 2 or more firms
Have partners who own equal percentages and contribute equally to the ventures operations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

equity alliance

A

A legally independent company formed by firms who own different percentages of a company
a greater (controlling) equity stake is owned by a partner who contributes more resources and capabilities to the alliance
creating a separate company
The partner who invests more resources—whether money, technology, or expertise—typically holds a greater (controlling) equity stake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

non equity alliance

A

A contractual agreement, no separate legal entity is formed
Licensing agreements, distribution agreements, supply contracts, outsourcing agreements
Not creating a separate company, require contracts

17
Q

complement alliance of business level, joint venture and horizontal example
apple and IBM

A

Apple got into an alliance with IBM
Apple got into an alliance with its rival (IBM) but created a joint venture to jointly create a new operating system to compete against microsoft
They each had their own reasons
Why would want IBM want to partner with apple: wanted to gain independence from microsoft
Big part of the cost for IBM was paying for microsoft on their computers, wanted to get away from this to reduce costs
Why would apple want to partner with IBM: apple wasnt doing so well, spending a lot on R&D and not enough return, wanted a better operating system
Apple wanted to share development costs with IBM
Joint venture
Ibm knows how to make their system compatible with other software
Each contributed financially
Foreseeable risks: alliances can be unreliable, the other partner may leave the alliance at any time→ low commitment but still some
Biggest risk si that one or both engage in opportunistic behavior
Apple was looking to outsource: vertical type of alliance (alliance between supplier and buyer), didn’t work well, new ceo of apple killed alliance→ very temporary and many fail

18
Q

business level, horizontal non equity alliance
ex: with Microsoft and yahoo

A

Competitors, but united by objective to gain market share and take it away from google
Google was trying to compete with google docs (microsoft word)
Microsfot wanted multipoint comp ad wanted to attack google in search industry
Micrsofiot made an offer to acquire yahoo
Close market share gap
Antitrust authorities blocked acquisition for microsoft so they decided to get into an alliance with yahoo instead to take on google
Yahoo provided its customer base, yahoo made revenue from adds through search, and microsoft would get some revenue→ strategic objective was to gain market share against google
Google grew more powerful , most people use google
Partnership is still contuinug

19
Q

Business level, vertical, non equity ex with Starbucks and oatly

A

Starbcuks could Target certain demographics with oatly
Tagrettig more customers
Caters to taste
Helps brand image of strabcuks, in fashion to be environmentally friendly
Whats in it for oatly: accessing more customers

20
Q

synergistic alliance
corporate level non equity
Walmart and mcdoanlds

A

Walmart and mcdonalds
Inside walmarts, there would be mcdonalds
Strategic benefit: : having mcdondals inside walmart can increase customer traffic
Same kind of clientele between walmart and mcdonalds, low to medium income families and can boost eachothers sales , increase unplanned purchases
Synergistic alliance

21
Q

franchising

A

Mcdonalds is a franchise
Expands through opening up franchising locations
Alliance between franchisor (mcdonalds) and franchisee (entepenur)
Each party has benefits ‘
Franchisor: dont have to invest capital to open up more locations
Franchisee invests money to build location, for local marketing, hires people, and if it does not succeed franchisee takes loss
Franchisor gains by going faster ( opens many stores at once), franchisor gets fees paid by franchisee and liscence
Franchisee avdnatages : mpre guarantee of success, training , brand name
franchiser allows franchise to use name

22
Q

ikea franchising

A

Ikea owns most locations
Good to invest in locations bc gives more control over quality bit dpesnt allow it to control as fast
Lower financial risk for ikea if they franchise also a type of alliance

23
Q

elli Lilly and raxanbery
cross boarder joint venture

A

Ex of cross border joint venture
Lilly wanted to enter india→ india gvt didnt allow foreign direct investment at 100%
Wanted to gain indias growing middle class
Had to find a local partner
Pharma leader at the time was ranbaxy → easier for eli lily to etsvakish themselves in india
For ranbaxy, researched western drugs but wanted to become a larger global company so they wanted to be with lilly to learn the best practices from the western company and get their capabilities so they could expand
Very successful partnership
Eli lily learned everything they needed to and ranbaxy learnt all the best practicies and needed money now to expand globally → this lead eli lily to buy rnabaxy steak in the joint venture and now it is eli lily wholly owned in india

24
Q

Cirque du soleil and mgm mirage
synergistic alliance, non equity

A

Created partnership with hotels in las vegas
Las vegas has a lot of tourists
Can maximize sales bc a lot of tourists
Mgm mirage wanted cirque du soleil bc it attracts people and can spend money in the casino and restaurant
Each benefited

25
Q

when evaluating alliances as a strategic option

A

▪Thinkwhat strategic objectives can be achieved through an alliance
▪Evaluate a targetpartner to fit objectives (partner’s resources, capabilities, trustworthiness)
▪Estimatevalue (synergies) that can be created by working together in an alliance
▪Make sure to understand benefits for each partner involved
▪Considering the temporary, non-committalnature of most alliances, evaluate the risks: intellectual property leakage, partners acting in an opportunistic way, misrepresentation of resources and capabilities
▪Remember the role of the human factorin making alliances succeed: partnerships are formed among human leaders where personalities, values and visions matte