week 7 Flashcards
gender: deficit, difference & dominance models to explain gender differences in interaction
- deficit: a lack to be fixed (one group does things wrong)
- difference: two cultures model
- dominance: power underlies difference (being assertive is unfeminine, helps keep women subordinate)
metalinguistic talk, metalanguage
- talk about talk: talk about the structures and dynamics of the conversation
- design features of reflexivity
discourse analysis (diff scales and meanings of discourse)
- discourse: can mean language longer than a sentence; can mean involving more than one person (more simple)
- more than the scale - beyond the sentence, pockets of meaning to contextualize the communication
- particular place, particular time exchanging ideas
- analysis of: conversations, how information is presented in the media, narratives in interviews, prevalent themes in the language of a group of people (how things are talked about and understood)
conversation analysis vs discourse analysis
- CA: fine-grained analysis of structure and dynamics of a conversation
- DA: includes CA but is broader, can include analysis of texts and overarching themes
Michel Foucault’s concept of discourse as a way of thinking, a way of ordering ideas
- the big d discourse
- not just discourse as in discussion but means a whole way of thinking and ordering ideas
- discourse of gender, discourse of freedom in America
- abstract concept
conditions leading to the emergence of nations and national languages
- industrial revolution (factories, urbanization, greater mobility)
- enlightenment (reason over tradition)
- democratization (all people equal citizens and have a voice in rule)
- spread of modern education, literacy, bureaucracies
- print capitalism (efficiency and profit lead to consolidation of language over larger territories)
language and identity before the age of nationalism (religious communities with sacred languages, dynastic realms with often more cultural/linguistic distance between peasantry & nobles than between nobles of different realms)
- 1st: identifying with a religious community: associated with a sacred language that was seen as immutable, embodying ultimate truth (most people not literate)
-2nd: dynastic realm: legitimacy of rule derived from divinity, populations were subjects, not citizens, states defined by centers, borders porous and indistinct
Dialect continuum
- in dynastic realm, language = differences between nobles and peasants, dialect continuum across states
- small diff village to village
- greater differences at greater distances and across geographic barriers
- a spectrum with no clear breaks
- still visible today
Language ideology
- ideology: most important factor of language; belief that the language is an entity, this usually goes along with a name/label
- mediating link between linguistic differences and social differences
- nationalism: 300 yrs old, defines sociopolitical world today
Print capitalism (& its role in the emergence of standard languages & nationalism)
- technology requires standardization
- unifies fields of communication (both inclusive and exclusive)
- creates borders
- creates language of power
Imagined communities
- feeling of solidarity with people you may never meet
Standardization
- creation of homogeneity in language
- involves: institutions responsible for determining and enforcing standards
- dictionaries and grammar books
- educational system
Centripetal & centrifugal forces shaping language
- standardization and prescription try to rein in language variation and change
- but language lives in passing between people; each person has slightly diff experiences
- what is cool, hip, intersting
- centripetal: what pulls in
- centrifugal: what flings out
Historical linguistics
- studies languages, their relationships, and how they have changed based on historical documents
- parent language forms can change in diff ways, leading to multiple new offspring languages
- contact between speakers of languages existing at same time can also influence change
- historical linguists reconstruct porto-languages by working backward from historical evidence
protolanguages
- hypothesized forms (not in recorded historical evidence) marked with asterisk