week 5 Flashcards

1
Q

phoneme

A

units of sound defined by distinctive features

  • distinctive features: characteristics of sound whose value changes the meaning of a word in a given language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

minimal pairs (sets)

A

pairs of words where one sound - phoneme makes a difference in meaning

sin/sing thin/thing thy/thigh beet/peat/teat/meet/cheat

context not necessary to distinguish meanings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

homophones

A

2 words with different meanings that sound the same

pair/pear to/two/too meat/meet

these pairs won’t help you figure out a language’s sounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

distinctive features vs. non-contrastive features

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

aspiration

A

not contrastive in English

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

allophones

A

differently produced sounds that are alternative pronunciations the same phoneme - p/spin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

McGurk effect

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

being deaf vs. being Deaf

A

being deaf: physical condition
being Deaf: cultural identity -

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ASL based on French Sign Language, British

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Thomas Gallaudet and laurent clerc

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

discreteness in signing

A

hand positioning and movement (establish boundaries in range of possible gestures)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DEZ

A

designator, hand shape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

TAB

A

tabula, location relative to body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SIG

A

signation, hand motion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ORI

A

palm orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

NMGS

A

non-manual grammatical signals; facial expressions, head and body movements

17
Q

iconicity and symbolism in sign languages

A
18
Q

morphology

A

study of word structure - how phonemes are combined into words/word-parts that have referential meaning

19
Q

suprasegmental features

A

features that can span more than one segment of language; features present in both oral and signed languages

in speech: intonation, stress, rhythm, pitch, loudness

in sign: speed, force of movement, rhythm, body orientation, facial expression

20
Q

intonation as a segmental feature vs. suprasegmental feature

A
21
Q

free and bound morphemes

A

smallest unit with referential meaning

free: can stand alone : sun, happy, eleven, later

bound: can’t stand alone
prefixes - un- de- semi-
suffixes -ist -tive -ness

22
Q

roots and affixes

A
23
Q

allomorphs

A

diff manifestations of same morpheme

-il im- in-
meaning not
illegitimate, improper

24
Q

isolating vs. agglutinating languages

A

isolating: low ratio of morphemes per word, meanings conveyed by separate unbound morphemes

agglutinating: high ratio of morphemes per word, meanings built onto words through affixes - glue

25
Q

syntax/grammar

A
26
Q

prescriptive grammar vs. descriptive grammar

A

prescriptive: one standard is correct and grammatical it is determined by institutions and authorities

natural/cognitive: various rules exist in naturally occurring language that we know about from observation/descriptive studies

27
Q

universal grammar, cognitive, generative

A

cognitive/generative: explaining underlying rules by which sentences are generated

28
Q

noam Chomsky

A

argued for innate grammar
universal patterns in the order of acquisition of grammar

29
Q

evidence for universal grammar

A

grid/blueprint all humans are born with, encoded in DNA, how we are wired “cognitive grammar”

parameters to be set, based on cues heard from spoken language

30
Q

implications of universal grammar theory

A

no primitive language, a;; natural languages are grammatical

31
Q

ungrammaticality according to linguistics versus social politics

A

deficient

32
Q

double negation as a grammatical option

A