Week 6: Limitations On Covenants Flashcards

1
Q

Rules & Bylaws

A
  1. Challenges governed by statute:
    (1) requires restrictions to be in initial covenant
    (2) amend CCR’s in the project declaration
    (3) violates common law
  2. Restraint on alienation (prevents owners from selling)
  3. Preferences to owners —> discrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Post-Civil War, New Body of Con Lse

A

13th A = outlaws slavery
14th A = no one shall be deprived of due process, equal protection or privileges/immunities of citizenship (birthright)
15th A = outlawed racial discrimination with respect to voting

Courts looking to work their ways around these
- limited federal protection to state action (gave individuals more freedom for unlawful activity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Historical urban design

A
  1. Racial segregation early function of emergent administrative state
    - rich neighborhoods started using racially segregated covenants
    - cities started racial zoning but then ruled unconstitutional
  2. Buchanan v. Wallet, courts stopped cracking down on racial zoning
  3. Unavailability of bank financing —> more disadvantages for black peoples
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Brooks & Rose on racially-restrictive covenant functions

A
  1. Not in tightly-knit communities
  2. In wealthier but less stable ones
  3. Games as proxies for effects on RRC’s:
  • assurance game: either everyone cooperates or goes on their own (need internal signal). When people think neighborhood is changing, will turn into…
  • prisoner’s dilemma: individual payoff greater when noncooperation (sell while others cooperating so get highest price)
  • hawk/dove: best outcome is where each party plays different role (communicating to outside world that outsiders not welcome); some assurance (covenants) needed

covenants on deeds maintained segregation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is Shelly consistent with people’s exclusion rights and why the Missouri Supreme Court rises to state action?

A
  1. Proxy for racial zoning
  2. Case is an ouster—total affront to Shelley’s rights —> reaches threshold of state action
  3. CL disapproves restraints on alientationc
  4. Right to buy and sell is rooted in 13th Amendment
    - forbade badges of servitude
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Post-Shelley

A
  1. Housing discrimination continued
  2. Courts rarely analyze if constitutional rights are implicated and don’t regard as state actions
    - feels private but really it’s collective action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly