Week 4: Adverse Possession & Nuisance Terms Flashcards
Elements
- Actual = be on property
- Exclusive = no one else using
- Open + notorious = others aware/provides notice
- Hostile/adverse = without TO’s permission/against their interests
- Continuous = based on ordinary land use
- Under Claim of Title = need to claim via good faith or bad faith requirements
Good faith v. Bad faith requirement
Good: only innocent person to mistakenly occupy land of someone else thinking it’s their it’s gonna acquire ownership
Bad: intentional dispossession, where adverse possessors intend to dispossess the true owner; she must know she’s occupying property owned by someone else yet still seeks to become its owner
Both incentivize present ownership and not lax ownership
Incentives
- Efficiency/utility = settled land quickly
- Labor/investment = use land productively
- Personhood/psychological interest = part of their land
- Hedge expectations vs. formal legal rules = norms prevail when they conflict with technical norms of the law (ex: not hard to enforce your ownership rights over a decade)
Effect on real owners
- Punishes lax owners
- Encourages labor—TO not doing enough
- Guards boundaries of your land
Nuisance law
Provided remedies for conduct that causes unreasonable harm to use and enjoyment of land
- courts are engaging in GOVERNANCE (balancing and regulating uses) whereas in exclusion, just draw a line
Trespass v. Nuisance
Trespass
- no injury required
- not necessarily intentional
- doesn’t haven’t to be “substantial” or “unreasonable”
Nuisance
- injured required
- intentional
- substantial
- unreasonable
Analyzing unreaonsableness
- Utility analysis (SKEPTICAL)
- coase theorem of reciprocal harms = maximize joint wealth - Sustainability of area = unsuitable = nuisance
- Priority of Use = if you’re here first could make you leave but would have to pay you
- Cost avoidance = what cost is avoiding harm/ affecting parties
- damnun absque injuria = harm without remedy (can’t prevent people from doing neighborly things)
Deciding liability
- Invasion
- Community norms (rural vs. urban)
- First in time
- Objective norms of neighborly behavior
Land use & regs will almost always supersede common law of nuisance
- zoning does what nuisance can’t (segregate)
- public/private nuisance wont be the answer to public at large so this is why we bring in reg state to supersede nuisance
Critics of Coase theorem
- Initial entitlement matters
- Endowment effects = overvaluing what you have
- Community norms
- High transaction-cost situations
- bilateral monopoly
- assembly/holdout problems = need lots of peeps