Week 4: Adverse Possession & Nuisance Terms Flashcards

1
Q

Elements

A
  1. Actual = be on property
  2. Exclusive = no one else using
  3. Open + notorious = others aware/provides notice
  4. Hostile/adverse = without TO’s permission/against their interests
  5. Continuous = based on ordinary land use
  6. Under Claim of Title = need to claim via good faith or bad faith requirements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Good faith v. Bad faith requirement

A

Good: only innocent person to mistakenly occupy land of someone else thinking it’s their it’s gonna acquire ownership

Bad: intentional dispossession, where adverse possessors intend to dispossess the true owner; she must know she’s occupying property owned by someone else yet still seeks to become its owner

Both incentivize present ownership and not lax ownership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Incentives

A
  1. Efficiency/utility = settled land quickly
  2. Labor/investment = use land productively
  3. Personhood/psychological interest = part of their land
  4. Hedge expectations vs. formal legal rules = norms prevail when they conflict with technical norms of the law (ex: not hard to enforce your ownership rights over a decade)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Effect on real owners

A
  1. Punishes lax owners
  2. Encourages labor—TO not doing enough
  3. Guards boundaries of your land
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Nuisance law

A

Provided remedies for conduct that causes unreasonable harm to use and enjoyment of land
- courts are engaging in GOVERNANCE (balancing and regulating uses) whereas in exclusion, just draw a line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Trespass v. Nuisance

A

Trespass
- no injury required
- not necessarily intentional
- doesn’t haven’t to be “substantial” or “unreasonable”

Nuisance
- injured required
- intentional
- substantial
- unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Analyzing unreaonsableness

A
  1. Utility analysis (SKEPTICAL)
    - coase theorem of reciprocal harms = maximize joint wealth
  2. Sustainability of area = unsuitable = nuisance
  3. Priority of Use = if you’re here first could make you leave but would have to pay you
  4. Cost avoidance = what cost is avoiding harm/ affecting parties
    - damnun absque injuria = harm without remedy (can’t prevent people from doing neighborly things)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Deciding liability

A
  1. Invasion
  2. Community norms (rural vs. urban)
  3. First in time
  4. Objective norms of neighborly behavior

Land use & regs will almost always supersede common law of nuisance
- zoning does what nuisance can’t (segregate)
- public/private nuisance wont be the answer to public at large so this is why we bring in reg state to supersede nuisance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Critics of Coase theorem

A
  1. Initial entitlement matters
  2. Endowment effects = overvaluing what you have
  3. Community norms
  4. High transaction-cost situations
    - bilateral monopoly
    - assembly/holdout problems = need lots of peeps
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly