Week 6 - End of Contract Law & Sale of Goods Flashcards
What is Discharge of a Contract
- when a Contract Comes to an End
- an Obligations Under the Contract Finish and the Parties are No Longer Bound in Law
- 4 Methods of Terminitating a Contract
What are the 4 Methds of TERMINATING (Discharge) a CONTRACT
- AGREEMENT
- PERFORMANCE
- FRUSTRATION
- BREACH
Explain DISCHARGE of a CONTRACT By AGREEMENT
- where the Parties Agree to Bring a Contract to an End Before All Obligations have Been Completed
- can be Bilateral or Unilateral Agreement
Explain DISCHARGE of a CONTRACT By AGREEMENT - BILATERAL AGREEMENT To DISCHARGE
- where Neither Party has Completed All Their Obligations e.g. Ronaldo at United, contract ends June 2023 but agreed to end contract early in January 2023
- the Consideration Each Party Offers is Releasing the Other Party From their Obligations
Explain DISCHARGE of a CONTRACT By AGREEMENT - UNILATERAL AGREEMENT To DISCHARGE
- One Party has Performed All their Obligations, But the Other Party Wishes to be Released From their Obligations Before Performing Them
- can Only be Released If the Party Provides some Consideration For the Release
- Agreement to be Released = Accord
- Supply of Consideration to be Released = Satisfaction
- e.g a Football Club Buying Another Teams Manager Out of a Contract
Explain DISCHARGE of a CONTRACT By FRUSTRATION
- Before the Obligation have Been Completed, an Event may Occur (through no fault of the parties) that Renders Performance Impossible
- e.g. Destruction of Subject Matter, ilness/injury of One Party, Non-Occurence of Cruical Event etc.
- Both Parties Discharge from Carrying Out any Further Obligations
Explain DISCHARGE of a CONTRACT By BREACH
- where 1 of the Parties Breaks One of More of the Contract
- Breach will Only Discharge the Contract If it’s a Condition or an Innominate Term that Deprives the Party of Substaintially By the Whole Benefit of the Contract
- 2 Types of Breach
ACTUAL Breach - Innocent Party can Sue for Breach and, If the Term Broken Is a Condition, can Also Terminate the Contract
ANTICIPATORY Breach - the Innocent Party may Sue Immediately or Wait for the Date of Performance to Pass
Explain DISCHARGE of a CONTRACT By PERFORMANCE
- the Ideal Method of Discharge
- Each Party has Done Precisely what they’ve Promised to Do
- Contract Ends All Obligations have been Performed
What are the REMEDIES for BREACH of CONTRACT
if the Contract is Breach, the Innocent Party may Claim for One of More of the Following Remmies in Court :
- DAMAGES
- QUANTUM MERUIT - a Claim for Work Done, where Completion has been Preveted By the Other Party
- SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE - Party is Legally Required to Complete Performance of Contract (or Specificed Action)
Explain the Remedie for Breach of Contract - DAMAGES
- Monetary Compensation Aimed to Put the Parties Into the Position they Would have been In Had the Breach Not Occured
- the Most Commonly Sought Remedy
- Up To the Court to Decide the Amount of Damages to Grand , Unless the Parties have Pre-Estimated the Amount of Damages & have Stated this In the Contract
- Where the Innocent Party Suffered No Real Loss, the Damages Awarded will be Nominal
- the Aim of Damages is to Restore the Innocent Party to the Same Financial Position they would have Been In If the Contract Had been Performed
- Not to Punish the Party who Broke the Contract
Explain REMOTENESS Of DAMAGE
- Claims for Damages are Restricted to the Recovery of Loses that Aren’t Too Remote
- Court to Decide How Far the Liability of the Defendant Extends
Explain MEASURE OF DAMAGES
- In Contract Law, the Purpose of Damages Is to Put the Claimant (as far as is possible) in the Financial Position they Would have Been In If the Contract has Been Performed Satisfactorily
- if the Contract was For the Sale of Goods, the Damages are Usually Assessed According To the Market Rule i.e. examining how much the goods would have cost on the open market
- If a Breach Results in a Lost Opportunity, This can be Recoverable If the Lost Chance can be Quantified
Explain the MEASURE Of DAMAGES Case - JOYCE V Bowman Law (2010)
- when Acting for Buyer of a House, the Conveyor Negligently Failed to Include a Buyer’s Option to Purchase Adjacent Land for £20,000
- the Buyer Claimed for Loss of Profit that could have Been Made on the Land
- Decision : Buyer was Entitled to £37,700 damages From the Lost Chance to Redevelop Property
Explain DAMAGES In BUILDING CONTRACTS
- Usually, when a Building Contract is Breached :
- Cost of Correcting the Deft = Amount of Damages that Can be Claimed
- However, the Courts may Decide that the Cost of Remedying the Defects is Disproportionate to the Difference in Value of What was Supplied and What was Ordered
- In this Situation, the Court will Award Damages to Reflect the Loss of Vlaue
- If No Real Loss in Value, this Will Minimise the Level of Damages
Explain the DUTY To MITIGATE
- the Claimant Must Take Appropriate Steps in Order to Minimise Their Losses
- they Cannot Claim Damages for Losses which Could have Reasonably been Avoided
- it’s For the Defendant to Prove that the Claimant Didn’t Minise their Losses