Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Commercial Law > Week 3 - Contract Law I > Flashcards

Week 3 - Contract Law I Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

What is a Contract?

A
  • Agreement between 2 or More Person that’s Legally Binding
  • Doesn’t Necessarily Have to Be in Writing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 5 Elements that Valid Contracts Require?

A

1- AGREEMENT (Offer and Acceptance of Definite Terms) - Some Terms may be Implied (e.g. quality of goods), Non-negotiable (standard form contract), Unenforceable (e.g. personal injury clauses)
2 - An INTENTION to CREATE LEGAL RELATIONS
3- COMPLIANCE with REQUIRED FORMALITIES where APPLICABLE
4 - CONSIDERATION - Promise to Give, Do or Refrain from Doing
5 - CAPACITY to CONTRACT - parties Must have Capacity to Enter Into a Contract. Contract May be Voided if Party Didn’t have Capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the Difference by the 2 Forms of a Contract - Simple and Speciality Contract

A
  • SIMPLE CONTRACTS - be Made in Any Form
  • SPECILAITY CONTRACTS - Have to be in a Particular Form to Be Legally Enforceable By the Courts
    Some Contracts Required to be Made by Deed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a BILATERAL CONTRACT?

A
  • where 1 Party Promises a Certain Action in Response to Other Party’s Action
  • e.g. Buying Goods in a Store, Fixing Someone’s Car for an Agreed Price
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a UNILATERAL CONTRACT

A
  • One Party Makes a Promise of an Action if Another Party (or parties) Executes of an Action, but No Obligation to Execute said Action
  • e.g. a Reward for Lost Property, an Insurance Policy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the how it works - the Agreement of a Contract Existing with an Offer and an Acceptance

A
  • Usually 1 Party Makes an Offer, Sets Out the Proposed Terms of the Contract (the Offeror)
  • Up to the Other Party Whether they Want to Accept this or Not
  • Offers Must be Clear, Without Terms that are Too Vague, Must be Distinct from an Invitation to Treat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Offer - Explain Fisher v Bell (1961)

A
  • a Statute Dictated that it was an Offense to ‘Offer for Sale’ an Offensive Weapon
  • a Shop Displayed flick knives for Sale in their Window
  • Verdict : as Contract Law Principles Stipulate that an Displaying Items in a Shop Window Constitutes an ‘Invitation to Treat’ and Not an Offer for Sale, the Defendant (shop) was Acquitted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain - When is an Offer an Offer in Relation to Unilateral Offer and an Advert

A
  • A Unilateral Offer could be Made in an Advert etc. to Everybody Without Communication of Acceptance
  • Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1893)
  • For a Unilateral Contract to be Valid, the Requested Action is Both Acceptance and Consideration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain an Offer being Distinct from a Statement Merely Giving Info to a Party and being Distinct from a mere puff or Boast

A
  • an Offer must be Distinct from a Statement Merely Giving Info To a Party or Expressing an Intention to Do Something In the Future
  • Harvey v Facey (1893)
  • an Offer must be Distinct from a Mere Puff or Boast
  • Leonard V Pepsico
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain how an Offer Must be Communicated To the Other Party

A
  • a Person Can’t Accept an Offer they Don’t Know About
  • e.g If a Reward is Given for Information, But the Informant Isn’t Aware of the Reward, they Can’t Retrospectively Claim the Reward After the Time of Executing the Action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State the 4 Ways an Offer Can be Terminated

A
  • Termination by REVOCATION
  • Termination by REJECTION and COUNTER OFFER
  • TERMINATION by LAPS of TIME
  • TERMINATION by DEATH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain TERMINATION of Offer by REVOCATION

A
  • Offer Withdrawn by Person Making the Offer
  • Can be Revoked at Any Time Up Until the Offer is Accepted, Even if the Offeror Informs the Offeree they will Keep The Offer Open for a Period of Time
  • Routledge v Grant (1828 ) - Although Offeror said Offer to Buy House is Open for 6 Weeks, they Were Within their Right to Sell to Someone Before Then
  • However, If Offeror Make Promise to Keep Offer Open and Offeree Gives Something in Return (consideration in law) , They’re Contractually Bound to Keep their Promise
  • Withdrawal Of the Offer Must be Communicated to the Offeree - Until Then the Offer Remains Open and Can be Accepted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain TERMINATION of Offer by REJECTION and COUNTER OFFER

A
  • If a Counter Offer is Made, This is Regarded as Rejection Of the Original Offer
  • Hyde v Wrench (1840)
    Defendant Offered to Sell Farm to Claimant for £1,000
    Claimant then Attempted to Buy Farm for £1000
    Verdict - Because Counter Offer was Made, Means Original Offer was Rejected, Therefore No Longer Open
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain Withdrawal of Offers in Unilateral Contracts

A
  • If an Offer is Made Unilaterally and the Offeree has Started to Execute the Action (part-performance), there’s Generally an Implied Obligation not to Withdraw the Offer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain TERMINATION of Offer by LAPS Of TIME

A
  • If the Offer has a Time Limit, It will Expire at the End of that Limit
  • If No Specified Time Limit, It will Still Expire After a Reasonable Time (could be weeks, months, Years, Depending on Nature of Offer)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain TERMINATION of Offer by DEATH

A
  • the Deceased Offeree is Unable to Accept an Offer Because they’re Dead
  • If Offeror Dies, then the Offer Terminates Once the Offeree Knows of the Death
  • If the Offeror Dies and the Offeree Doesn’t Know the Death, Could be Legally Uncertain, Particularly If there’s a Element of Part Performance
17
Q

What is Acceptance?

A

Acceptance of an Offer is the Unconditional Acceptance to All the Terms of an Offer
- Can be Made :
In writing, Hammer Fall at an Action
- Is Unconditional :
Any Introduction or Amendment of Terms will be Seen as a Counter-Offer, Therefore a Rejection of the Original
If Counter Offer is Accepted, that will Form the Terms of the Contract

18
Q

Explain Acceptance Must being a Positive act in relation to Bilateral and Unilateral Contract

A
  • In a Bilateral Contract, the Silence of the Offeree Can’t be Regarded as Acceptance
  • In a Unilateral Contract, the Offeree Doesn’t Need to Communicate Acceptance to the Offeror as Long As the Terms of Offer are Understood and Executed by the Offeree (e.g. Part Performance)
19
Q

Explain the Communication of Acceptance

A
  • Generally, Acceptance Must be Communicated To the Offeror
  • Acceptance Must be Communicated By the Offeree Of an Authorised Agent - an Ordinary 3rd Party Wouldn’t Be Effective
20
Q

Explain Methods of (showing) Acceptance

A
  • If the Offeror Doesn’t State a Particular Method, the Court will Usually Accept Any Reasonable Method of Communication By the Offeree
  • If the Offeror Doesn’t State a Particular Method, Acceptance will Only be Valid If Communicated In that Method (or an Equally Effective Manner that Doesn’t Disadvantage the Offeror
21
Q

Explain the Communication of Acceptance

A

There Exists some Exception to the Rule that Acceptance Must be Communicate
- Unilateral Contracts - e.g. Carlil v Carbonic Smoke, Acceptance Didn’t have to be Communicated
- Postal Acceptance - General Rule is that Acceptance is Valid as Soon as the Notice of Acceptance Enters the Postal System

22
Q

Explain Intention to Create Legal Relations in relation to Agreement

A
  • For an Agreement to Be Legally Binding, the Parties Must Intend for Legal Relations (i.e. Rights and Obligations to be Imposed on Them
  • Intention Doesn’t Necessarily Have to be Stated
  • If There’s a Dispute Over the Agreement, Court Needs to Decide If there’s an Intention to Create Legal Relations or Not
23
Q

Explain Intention to Create Legal Relations - Social and Domestic Agreements

A
  • Social, Domestic & Family Arrangement Aren’t Legally Binding
  • Key Case : Balfour v Balfour (1919) - Agreement Between Separated Husband & Wife to Pay Maintenance
24
Q

What are Exemption To The Presumption

A

If There’s Clear Evidence that Legal Relations were Intended to be Created
Simpkins v Pays (1955)
- 2 Family Members and a Lodger Jointly Enter Newspaper Competitions, Sharing Cost of Entry
- When Defendant won £750, Refused to Pay Claimant
- Verdict : As they Had Equally Contributed to Entering Competitions, There’s an Expectation that the Prize would be Shared Equally

25
Q

Explain Intention to Create Legal Relations - Business and Commercial Agreements

A
  • Generally a Presumption that Both Parties Intend to Create Legal Relations
  • As Citizens, this is Important to Remember When Entering into Non-Monetary Transactions with Business Entities, for Example :
  • Competitions
  • Free Gifts
  • Using Social Media
26
Q

Summary of Intention

A

In Situations where It’s Not Obvious Whether there Was Intention to Create Legal Relations, the Court will Consider the Individual Circumstance Of the Arrangement
- i.e. it Depends from Case-to-Case

Commercial Law (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions