Week 5-Politics Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Political Functions - How does politics Inform Citizens?

A

■ ‘‘A basic tenet of democratic theory is that voters’ choices must be based on informed thinking about political issues’’ (Bode et al. 2013).

-We are reliant on mass media for information to get to us + politicians to get their message across

■ Dissemination of information is the primary political function of the media

■ New information and retrospective evaluation

■ Political socialisation (what we think and who we endorse) and opinion development

■ People often seek out information in other media (e.g., watching news),
whereas social media use is primarily driven by maintaining social ties, with information obtained incidentally to that primary goal

■ 2004 election, 51% of Internet users encountered news or information
about the elections when going online for other reasons (Pew, 2004) (not something we seek out bur rather encounter in our daily lives)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Political Engagement: What did Xenos et al. (2014) find?

A

■ Social media use may increase knowledge of political issues, which then promotes political engagement

■ Information is often viewed from friends etc. (rather than intentional information seeking)

Xenos et al. (2014):
■ 3685 people completed surveys
■ Two measures of political engagement (individual engagement and collective engagement)

■ Strong positive relationship between social media use and political engagement (both individual and collective) in all three countries (Australia, the USA, and the UK)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Political Engagement: What did Boulianne (2015) find?

A

■ Meta-analysis on 36 studies assessing the relationship between social media use and participation in civic and political life e.g. voting, protesting and volunteering

■ Overall, positive relationship between social media use and participation

■ Causality unclear (those who are politically motivated will use social media more often)

■ Only half of the coefficients were statistically significant

■ Scheufele et al. (2002) –media use influences involvement in local politics (more engaged in the local community, more aware of local issues therefore more involved in their local politics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Political Functions – Supporting
Actors: What does the success of political actors depend on?

A

Politicians NEED mass media

  1. Gaining positive attention from the media e.g., visiting children’s hospitals
  2. Presenting persuasive stories
  3. Creating a receptive political environment

■ Press releases are framed to meet media need (shaped by the politicians)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Lee et al. (2018) find about disclosure?

A

■ Two experiments investigating politicians’ personal disclosures (social media engagement) on social media and voter intention

■ Study 1 - Personal (e.g., “Happy 25th Anniversary! Thank you, Pat, for staying by my side for all these years. #MarriageBliss #FamilyLove,” OR impersonal posts (e.g., “Today I visited the CDC to see how America is tackling adolescent obesity”)

■ Study 2 – similar (different cultural context in South Korea - found simila results)

■ After reading a male politician’s personal stories participants liked him more and became more willing to vote for him – but not for women (her perceived competance was higher on impersonal disclosures)

-Not the case that all messages are received similarly (for women, personal disclosures could be seen as not dedicating their full time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Political Functions – What’s a Watchdog

A

■ Media obligation to act as a watchdog (to keep politicians in check ensuring they are acting with honesty and integrity)

■ US – media protected by the First Amendment

■ Example: Watergate corruption scandal uncovered by Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What’s Fact-Checking?

A

■ Assessment of the truthfulness of political advertisements by news media organizations and watchdog groups

Fridkin et al. (2015):
■ Used negative advertisements (deflecting to the other candidate so they use time to defend themselves rather than their plans) running during the 2012 U.S. Senate race in Ohio influence people’s impressions of the candidates

■ Fact-checks influence people’s assessments of the accuracy, usefulness,
and tone of negative political ads

■ Those with a low tolerance for negative campaigning are most responsive to
fact-checks

■ Negative (they’re not telling the truth) fact-checks are more powerful than positive (they’re telling the truth) fact-checks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What’s Mediatization? (Stromback, 2008)

A

-We have undergone as a society this process of mediatization where the media has come increasingly important.

-Left hand side the most important forms of information is from people we know

-Right hand side the most important forms of information we get is from the media

-The media is now governed by media logic (i.e., when they want to run a debate for millions to access where politicians will want to join for their benefit).

CHECK SLIDES FOR IMAGE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some Actions and Behaviour in Politics?

A

■ Gatekeeping – Media select the events and information to cover (i.e., what gets through)

■ Agenda-Setting – Influence the political issues deemed important (i.e., it’s through but where? is it on the front page? or a small section in the middle page)

■ Framing – Report information from a particular perspective (e.g., the winter fuel allowance to portray it in an empathetic way)

■ Framing is increasingly prevalent in the hyper-partisan news environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the four narratives which dominate political stories (Van Zoonen, 2005)

A
  1. Quest - politics as an individual struggle for a goal e.g. for election - struggling to be elected and fighting to be in power (i.e., personal stories)
  2. Conspiracy - politics as a deliberate attempt by an organisation to thwart the good intentions of others (e.g., the government vs the middle guy)
  3. Bureaucracy - frustrated ambition attributed to the political system (e.g., the processes people get caught up in)
  4. Soap - people struggle together to achieve
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the 4 types of bias, varying according to the explicitness of the bias and the intention behind it? (McQuail, 1992)

A

■ Partisan bias – cause is extreme and explicitly and deliberately promoted e.g. editorial

■ Propaganda bias – story reported with the intention of making the case for a party or policy or point of view (without explicitly stating this)

■ Unwitting bias – reflecting the decision to include or exclude a story

■ Ideological bias – bias is hidden but can be detected at a close reading of the text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What’s Partisan Media?

A

■ Partisans trust co-partisans more than supporters of the opposing party (Iyengar & Westwood 2014)

■ Substantial proportions of both Republicans and Democrats are distressed
by the prospect of a family member marrying a supporter of the opposing
party (Iyengar et al. 2012)

Lelkes et al. (2017):
■ Access to broadband Internet increases partisan hostility and consumption of partisan media whereas this is seen much less with Dial-Up (as they spend less time online)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Partisan Media: Taber and Lodge (2006) What is the theory of affect-driven ‘‘motivated reasoning?

A

Three mechanisms of partisan or biased reasoning:
1. Partisan voters evaluate supportive arguments more positively than opposing

  1. Voters spend more time and cognitive resources picking apart counter-arguments
  2. When voters are free to choose and they seek out confirming rather than disconfirming arguments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Partisan Media: What are politicians view around Climate Change?

A

■ 1989 Gallup poll - 67% of Democrats and 66% of Republicans worried a great deal or fair amount about global warming

■ 2016 Gallup poll – Democrats 84% and Republicans 40% level of concern

Carmichael et al. (2017):
■ When Republicans are presented with opposing frames about climate change from liberal media, they reject the messages and become less concerned about the issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are Comedy Partisan Programmes?

A

■ Use of humour to convey news from a bias perspective (i.e., viewers want the show to have similar political views)

■ Widely used throughout the US and increasing in popularity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the types of Propaganda?

A
  • White propaganda - source is clearly identifiable
  • Grey propaganda - source is either unidentifiable or difficult to identify
  • Black propaganda - disguised source
17
Q

What’s Cloaking?

A

■ Cloaking - imitating the identity of a political opponent in order to spark
hateful and aggressive reactions

Farkas et al. (2017):
■ Investigated cloaked Facebook pages

■ Danish Facebook pages disguised as radical Islamist pages

■ “Alhamdulillah. We take over Denmark and you kuffars [infidels] can’t even stop us. We transform shitty Denmark into an Islamic state and this will happen before your eyes, and you can’t do a thing about it. Your churches will be turned into mosques, your whore women will be fucked and used by us Muslims to make our babies, we take your money that you work 7 to 5 to earn while we Muslims live in luxury, your food will become halal and your laws will be sharia and what are you going to do about it? NOTHING! (Islam: The Religion of Peace, Facebook post, 21 April 2015)

18
Q

What did Marwick and Lewis (2017) find about fake news?

A

■ Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online report

Outlines:
a) media manipulation by various groups (e.g., Internet trolls, hate groups, conspiracy theorists, politicians)

b) the use of different media types (e.g., websites, forums, social media)

c) motivations for manipulating the media (e.g., ideology, money, status / attention)

d) Techniques
■ Participatory culture
■ Networks
■ Memes
■ Bots
■ Strategic amplification and framing

e) Vulnerability of the media
■ Lack of trust in the media
■ Decline of local news
■ The attention economy

19
Q

Checking Fake News

A

https://firstdraftnews.org/training/ (helps journalists identify fake news)

  • Provides an introduction to fact-checking political claims and campaigns
  • Identifies the tools used by journalists etc to verify claims (London Riots 2011? e.g., does the picture contain road signs which would be seen in London?)
20
Q

Political Campaigns

A

■ Patterson (1976) “Today’s presidential campaign is essentially a mass media campaign…for the large majority of voters; the campaign has little reality apart from its media version”

■ Political campaigns are tailored to media activity

■ Provides voters with important information about the candidates

■ Example: Roosevelt ‘fireside chats’ (listened to the president talking via the radio)

21
Q

What are the 3 developments of postmodern campaigns? (Norris, 2000)

A
  1. Fragmentation of audience and outlets
  2. Tabloidization of news due to commercial pressure
  3. Permanent campaigns informed by polling, focus groups etc.,

■ Results in focus on candidates not issues and the ‘horse race’

22
Q

How does Television impact Political Campaigning?

A

■ Television became a major source of campaign information in the 1950s

■ Provides both auditory and visual information – important for many events to
convey the impact

■ Large proportion of campaign spent allocated to television advertisements that
reach a large number of voters with messages unaltered by the press

■ Many campaign events are staged to allow greater media exposure

■ Particular emphasis on image, scripting and controlling all aspects of the event

■ Increased importance on television debates, party conventions etc

23
Q

Give an example of how Television impacts political campaigning: Kennedy vs Nixon (ask for reference or is it just polls?)

A

■ Four (1hr) televised debates

■ John F. Kennedy (Democratic nominee) vs Richard N. Nixon (Republican nominee)

■ 55% of voters listened or watched at least some of all debates

■ 80% of voters listened or watched at least some of one debate

■ Kennedy: Charismatic, comfortable
■ Nixon: Tired, uncomfortable, sweating, did not smile at the camera

■ Voters watching believed that Kennedy won the debate

■ Voters listening believed that Nixon won the debate

24
Q

How does the Internet impact political campaigns?

A

■ Potential conflict between campaigns and television has led to increased use of
‘unfiltered media’ e.g. Internet

■ Additional value of anywhere, anytime access

■ Increasingly fragmented audience (having an impressive media campaign, can address fragmentation within the audience)

■ Voters can select, access and produce targeted information

■ Gulati (2010) “ Today, the World Wide Web is the single best medium for allowing
candidates to communicate directly, without any filter, to a multitude of
constituencies simultaneously while maintaining a great deal of control over their own message”

25
Q

How do weblogs impact political campaigns? (Johnson & Kaye, 2004)

A

■ Surveyed Weblog users online to investigate how credible they view blogs

■ Almost three- quarters (73.6%) of Weblog readers view Weblogs as moderately to very credible and only 3.5% consider them “not at all” or “not very credible” (therefore people are using this content and see this as something that can and will inform their political decisions even if not as mediated as the mainstream media)

26
Q

Give an Example of the impact the Internet has on Political Campaigns: Obama Campaign 2008

A

■ Campaign spend for all parties = $2.4 bn

■ Obama rejected public financing and raised more money (spend: $747.8m) than rival candidates (McCain spend: $351.6m) (which is a clever move)

■ First campaign with major emphasis on new media technology (i.e., the internet)

■ Obama website: organised events, raised money and maintained contact with supporters

■ Obama videos watched 52m times on YouTube (cost-effective way of getting these messages out there)

■ Many viral pro-Obama videos e.g. ObamaGirl: 13m views (a young attractive women made a video reciting what Obama said which may have drawn in people especially those who did not engage with traditional media outlets)

■ Substantial use of social networking sites, important for younger voters (i.e., focusing on specific areas of interest to specific groups of people e.g., abortion rights for women)

■ ‘‘The Internet served our campaign in unprecedented ways’’ —President Barack Obama”

27
Q

Give an Example of the Internet on Political Campaigns: Obama Campaign 2008 (Cogbun & Espinoza-Vasquez, 2011)

A

■ Primary data sources were the Obama ‘08 Web site (BarackObama. com), the Obama Twitter feed, the Obama Facebook site, the Obama MySpace page, e-mails, iPhone application, and the subsequent Change.gov and Transition.gov sites created by the Obama-Biden transition team.

■ Campaign created a nationwide virtual organization that motivated 3.1
million individual contributors

■ Personalized campaign Web site and blog with specific messages. He also
organized ‘”Obama communities’” in targeted areas. Groups such as
‘”Asian Americans for Obama’” and ‘£Educators for Obama”

■ Campaign requested supporters’ e-mail addresses, ZIP codes, and telephone numbers during rallies – provided a database of information about supporters and a direct line of communication

■ Iphone application. Brand recognition and encouragement to contact others (via information in the contacts list)

28
Q

What’s the impact of Negative Advertising?

A

■ Forms a substantial part (1/3) of campaign advertising

■ Voters dislike negative advertising (Demody et al. 2016)

■ Negative advertising can disrupt rival campaigns and demand time and
effort to address their criticisms (and if they say they won’t because it’s silly, there will be a proportion of voters who believe that because they’ve said nothing it must be true)

■ Negative advertising can however highlight differences between candidates and reveal important information

■ Jackson and Carsey (2007) – advertising predicts voter turnout (US Senate campaigns) – mobilization effect. The mobilization effect resulted almost entirely from the volume of negative adverts aired.

29
Q

What’s the impact of Negative Advertising? (Dowling & Wichowsky, 2014)

A

■ 2012 presidential elections, 85% of ads sponsored by groups, 54% of candidate-sponsored ads ,and 51% of party-sponsored ads were negative (Fowler & Ridout, 2012) (creates a slight difference from the negative advertisments)

■ Candidates who air an attack ad are subject to a “backlash effect”

Dowling & Wichowsky (2014):
■ Experiments randomly assigning participants to view a negative ad -
identical except for its sponsor

■ Candidate-sponsored negative ads result in more backlash against the attacking candidate compared to group-sponsored ads and, to a lesser extent, party-sponsored ads

30
Q

What’s the impact of Negative Advertising? (Hopp & Vargo, 2017)

A

■ Negative political advertising and political incivility on Twitter (2012 presidential campaign)

■ Data collected from over 140,000 individual Twitter users located in 206
Designated Market Areas

■ Attack advertisements stimulate broader engagement with the election

■ Negative relationship between the average number of Tweets per user (in
each DMA) and overall incivility levels

■ Consistent with the assumption that negative advertising primarily stimulates those with low levels of normal political engagement and suggests that a bulk of the uncivil discourse appearing on Twitter
emanates from relatively infrequent contributors.

31
Q

How does Media Influence Politics?

A

■ Initial studies failed to find media effects (voter behaviour, party identification)

■ These studies focused on the media that voters selected

■ Iyengar and Kinder (1987) manipulated political video messages (news stories)

■ Messages varied according to a) the issue highlighted b) if the President was responsible

■ Influence on the issues participants believed were important and those
believed to be responsible

32
Q

Media Influence – What are the Negative
Effects?

A

■ Polling: Political actors can use polls to inform policy decisions and frame issues accordingly

■ Voter apathy (the more scandal/corruption stories + negative advertisements = more likely voters are to just not endorse either party)

■ Greater coverage of scandal, conflict etc.,

■ Reduction of objective content