Week 5 Grice's Maxims Flashcards
Indirect speech acts
“Do you have any money on you?” meaning “I don't have any money; can I borrow some from you?” How do we work out what this utterance really means = CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE
CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE
The utterance (“Do you have any money on you?”) =
additional message which Grice (1967) called a conversational
implicature.
- arrive thru process of INFERENCE based on UNDERSTANDING of RULES governing SUCCESSFUL CONVERSATIONAL INTERACTION
- usual ling meaning
- CONTEXTual info (shared knowledge)
- assumption speaker obeying: CO-OP PRINC.
Cooperative Principle
Make Conversational Contribution:
- AS REQuired
- AT STAGE which it occurs
- BY ACCEPTED PURPOSE/DIRECTION
- Of TALK EXCHANGE
GENERAL: Mutually Engaged w Listener in Activity which Benefit BOTH
RULES: 4 CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS
Conversational Maxims
- RELATION: be relevant
- QUANTITY: not too much/too little (overexplain/omitt)
- QUALITY: say truth/support it
- MANNER: Clear: Brief, ordely, /no/ obscurity + ambiguity
> > maxims HIGHLY culturally bound
>notions of ‘relevance’, ‘clarity’,
‘informativeness’ etc. may be culturally bound.
obeying maxims
normal convo - cooperateive
flouting maxims
maxim DELIBERATELY disobeyed, w/ INTENTION hearer recognise that this is the case
=
INDIRECT SPEECH ACTS
violating maxims
- not relevant
- too much/omit
- lie
- RARE, because we need them for convo, or only happens in intercultural context sometimes by accident
flouting quality
• (The Maxim of Quality: Say only what you believe to be true and
adequately supported)
• “What a wonderful neighbourhood.” (about slum)
• A deliberate falsehood for rhetorical effect
flouting quantity
(The Maxim of Quantity: Be only as informative as required for
current conversational purposes)
• A book review …
“This first novel is well bound and is remarkably free of typographical errors. …”
IE: “It’s garbage …”
flouting manner
• (The Maxim of Manner: Be clear: be brief and orderly and avoid
obscurity and ambiguity)
• a reference …
VAGUE VAGUE
• “Mr. Jones is given to the presumptive.”
This is vague (I’d have to look up the word!) and pretty unhelpful as it
stands. You’d infer that the speaker doesn’t like Mr Jones and doesn’t want
to say very much.
flouting relevance
• (The Maxim of Relation: Be relevant)
A. ‘What on earth has happened to the roast beef?’
B. ‘The dog is looking very happy.’
IE: The dog ate the roast…
Indirect speech acts
- acts that DEPEND (for their interpretation) on HEARER’s ability to RECOGNISE cooperative principle = deliberately breached