Week 3 - Animal Communication Systems ! Flashcards
Can animals communicate?
ofcourse
- howl
- feed me
- pay attention
- hiss
Set REPERTOIRE of LIMITED ITEMS
lang? no.
The European honey bee communication
- Scout bees perform 1 of 2 dances, which indicate:
> distance
> direction
> extent of food source
innate, though young bees get better w practice
ROUND DANCE:
- food within 10m
- SPEED/DURATION = richness of foodsource
- scent on bee = type of food
btwn - either
TAIL-WAGGING DANCE
- over 100m away
- orientation of straight line portion = direction according to sun
- length of time wagging = distance
- excitation level = richness
Birds - Calls and Songs
CALLS = short note sequences assoc. w events/activities small no. w discr functs: - flight, flocking feeding - special alarm, general alarm - aggression/pleasure
SONGS = establish TERRITORY, attract MATES
- may be innate (cuckoo), partially/completely learned
> general chara innate, finer learned
- some spcs male/female calls distinct by hormonal syst
whales and dolphines
SMALL NO. of discrete VOCALISATIONS with reference to EXTernal
conditions or INTernal states
Pure tones
- whistles (signature, distress) - squeaks
Pulsed sounds
- Reg. Clicks (echo) - Bark/yelp/moan (emotional sts)
Primate Communication
- Highly CONTEXTUALISED
- Multimodal
> GESTURE
> POSTURE
> SMELL - more signs than birdcalls, no real diff in /complexity/
Hockett’s Design features for Human Language
- 16
- can be used in comparing diff comms systems
4 relevant:
- ARBITRARINESS
- DUALITY OF PATTERNING
- DISPLACEMENT
- PRODUCTIVITY/CREATIVITY
Hockett’s ARBITRARINESS
Human lang = SYMBOLIC, ergo arbitrary
Most animal = NOT. EG: Acoustic structure of birdcalls often directly related to function
Example of Arbitrary Animal: Honey Bee Dance
Hockett’s DISPLACEMENT
Human Lang = communicate about something DISTANT in TIME/SPACE or IMAGINARY
- FREEDOM FROM STIMULOUS/RESPONSE
Animals = NOT. EG: Bees cant say “wonder if theres good nectar in Buenos Aires?”
Hockett’s DUALITY OF PATTERNING
Human Lang = combo of (meaningless) parts to meaningFUL wholes
(morphemes/phones/words)
Animals = signs NOT decomposable into Parts
Hockett’s PRODUCTIVITY/CREATIVITY
Human Lang units can be combined to create INFINITE NUMBER of entirely novel sentences
Animals = NOT
what constitutes HUMAN language
Lang competence involves:
- SEMANTICS
- SYNTAX
- PRAGMATICS
People who think animals are using language are engaging in
- wishful thinking
- “clever hans” effect
- overinterpretation (nim chimpsky - copying, random, prompting. washoe - transforming data by deleting markers)
- anthropomorphism fallaxy