Week 4 - Style and Class Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 5 external variation factors?

A
  • Gender
  • Age
  • Class
  • Ethnicity
  • Style
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do we mark social class?

A
  • Education
  • Economic status
  • Dress style
  • Job
  • Speech style
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is an issue with class?

A
  • Hard to define
  • Inherently fuzzy compared to age and sex (Chambers)
  • Women and children defined by husband/father (Trudgill)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Study NYC

Name
Date
Method

A
  • Labov 1972
  • Assumes staff represent class divisions
  • 3 department stores
  • /r/ prestige
  • Sampled natural speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Study NYC findings

A
  • Lower class used more non-standard
  • Upper class used most standard
  • More prestigious forms higher the class
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Study Norwich

Name
Date
Method

A
  • Trudgill 1974
  • Indexed class using multiple factors
  • Investigated /a:/ and /n/ variables
  • Reading passage, casual and formal speech, word list
  • LWC, MWC, UWC, LMC and MMC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why do we look at style?

A
  • Depends on formality of situations
  • Natural style and more conscious style
  • Unconscious = more casual and vernacular
  • Conscious = more formal and standard
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define the observers paradox

A

Labov 1972

When the situation being observed is affected by the presence of an investigator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Study Norwich findings

A
  • Lower social status and formality = more non-standard forms
  • Men use more non-standard forms, as do WC
  • UWC highest stylistic variation, MMC lowest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define broad stratification

A

Large changes in frequencies of use between groups of speakers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define fine/gradient stratification

A

Small changes in frequencies of use between groups of speakers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define indicator

A

A linguistic variable which shows little or no style shifting

Eg. Palatalisation of due in Australian or non-palatalisation in American

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define marker

A

A linguistic variable which shows style shifting

Eg. AAVE she be going

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define stereotype (linguistic)

A

A linguistic feature which is widely recognised and often the subject of overt comment

Eg. G’day mate in Australian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are some considerations we need to make for variation?

A
  • Hypercorrection
  • Linguistic insecurity vs change in progress
  • Some classes are on the ‘cusp’ eg. UWC and LMC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define linguistic insecurity

A

Lack of confidence and self-consciousness in terms of linguistic style and ability

17
Q

Define hypercorrection

A

Over-application of a certain rule in order to avoid using non-standard variants

Eg. She invited my boyfriend and I (I should be me)

18
Q

What was said about class and mobility?

Name
Date

A
  • Chambers 2003
  • Upwardly mobile individuals don’t carry WC markers into MC
  • They adjust the frequency of variables to sound like the class they are joining
19
Q

What is audience design?

Name
Date

A
  • Style shifting in response to audience members
  • Shift towards audience

Bell 1984

20
Q

What is speaker design?

Name
Date

A
  • Recreating speaker identity through speech
  • Speech used to re-shape position with respect to other people

Coupland 2001

21
Q

Oprah and /ay:/ study

Name
Date
Findings

A

Hay et al. 1999

  • Bell 1983 referees and over-hearers influence speech style
  • Hypothesis: Oprah use more monopthongisation when discussing AA guests
  • Result: Switches to appeal to all sections of the audience
22
Q

Study Detroit

Name
Date
Findings

A

Wolfram 1969

  • Black speech
  • She think vs She thinks you’re right
  • Class correlated
  • WC speech contains variables not found in MC
  • Eg. Non standard was: You was there too