Week 4 - Style and Class Flashcards
What are the 5 external variation factors?
- Gender
- Age
- Class
- Ethnicity
- Style
How do we mark social class?
- Education
- Economic status
- Dress style
- Job
- Speech style
What is an issue with class?
- Hard to define
- Inherently fuzzy compared to age and sex (Chambers)
- Women and children defined by husband/father (Trudgill)
Study NYC
Name
Date
Method
- Labov 1972
- Assumes staff represent class divisions
- 3 department stores
- /r/ prestige
- Sampled natural speech
Study NYC findings
- Lower class used more non-standard
- Upper class used most standard
- More prestigious forms higher the class
Study Norwich
Name
Date
Method
- Trudgill 1974
- Indexed class using multiple factors
- Investigated /a:/ and /n/ variables
- Reading passage, casual and formal speech, word list
- LWC, MWC, UWC, LMC and MMC
Why do we look at style?
- Depends on formality of situations
- Natural style and more conscious style
- Unconscious = more casual and vernacular
- Conscious = more formal and standard
Define the observers paradox
Labov 1972
When the situation being observed is affected by the presence of an investigator.
Study Norwich findings
- Lower social status and formality = more non-standard forms
- Men use more non-standard forms, as do WC
- UWC highest stylistic variation, MMC lowest
Define broad stratification
Large changes in frequencies of use between groups of speakers
Define fine/gradient stratification
Small changes in frequencies of use between groups of speakers
Define indicator
A linguistic variable which shows little or no style shifting
Eg. Palatalisation of due in Australian or non-palatalisation in American
Define marker
A linguistic variable which shows style shifting
Eg. AAVE she be going
Define stereotype (linguistic)
A linguistic feature which is widely recognised and often the subject of overt comment
Eg. G’day mate in Australian
What are some considerations we need to make for variation?
- Hypercorrection
- Linguistic insecurity vs change in progress
- Some classes are on the ‘cusp’ eg. UWC and LMC
Define linguistic insecurity
Lack of confidence and self-consciousness in terms of linguistic style and ability
Define hypercorrection
Over-application of a certain rule in order to avoid using non-standard variants
Eg. She invited my boyfriend and I (I should be me)
What was said about class and mobility?
Name
Date
- Chambers 2003
- Upwardly mobile individuals don’t carry WC markers into MC
- They adjust the frequency of variables to sound like the class they are joining
What is audience design?
Name
Date
- Style shifting in response to audience members
- Shift towards audience
Bell 1984
What is speaker design?
Name
Date
- Recreating speaker identity through speech
- Speech used to re-shape position with respect to other people
Coupland 2001
Oprah and /ay:/ study
Name
Date
Findings
Hay et al. 1999
- Bell 1983 referees and over-hearers influence speech style
- Hypothesis: Oprah use more monopthongisation when discussing AA guests
- Result: Switches to appeal to all sections of the audience
Study Detroit
Name
Date
Findings
Wolfram 1969
- Black speech
- She think vs She thinks you’re right
- Class correlated
- WC speech contains variables not found in MC
- Eg. Non standard was: You was there too