Week 4; Performance Management and Diversity Flashcards
What is performance management?
Establishing and measuring employee goals to improve individual and organisational performance.
Synonymous with SHRM as both focus on increased organisational performance.
Traditional performance management model:
1) Performance plan: Translate organizational goals into individual goals; Determine what will be measured to determine performance.
2) Feedback: Provide feedback about performance.
3) Mid-year evaluation: Discuss incremental goal attainment, redefine goals if needed.
4) Year end performance appraisal: Formal performance rating; Discuss goal attainment and areas for improvement.
Performance appraisal:
An interview between employee and their manager to review performance, set future goals and make decisions regarding development and promotion.
High-performance work practices (HPWPs):
Also known as advanced HR practices are management practices that are strategic or progressive in nature. For example, pay for performance, information sharing, teamwork and performance management.
AMO model:
Ability-Motivation-Opportunity; suggests that HR plays a huge role in defining and increasing each of these categories.
Training improves ability;
Pay performance management improves motivation;
Teamwork and information sharing provide opportunities.
Goal-setting theory:
Goals are SMART: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timed.
Goal setting and performance can be strengthened by:
Goal commitment;
Goal importance;
Self-efficacy (confidence in ability to perform);
Receiving feedback.
Principles -
clarity, challenge, commitment, feedback, complexity.
Expectancy theory:
Motivation is based on factors:
Expectancy (E): The probability that effort will be followed by a given level of task performance.
Instrumentality (I): The probability that achieved task performance will be followed by various work outcomes.
Valence (V): the value attached by the individual to various work outcomes.
Limitation: assumes rationality with how individuals think and behave. Thus, hard to define needs to motivate.
Equity theory:
Refers to the comparison between inputs (effort, performance by employee) and outputs (rewards and recognition received in return). Focuses on how equally and fairly employees must be treated, as they will try to restore equity either by lowering inputs, disregarding comparable employees or terminating the relationship.
Limitation of this theory: Hard to define employees’ perception of inputs and outputs.
Den Hartog, Boselie and Paauwe’s Model of PM:
Suggests that HR practices in alignment with performance management impact employees perceptions and attitudes. By aligning HRM practices with PM consistent messages communicated to employees are ensured. Furthermore, line managers play a central role in implementing these policies.
Strategic PM:
Refers to aligning individual goals to organisational goals to achieve competitive advantage.
Engagement:
The extent to which employees demonstrate energy, dedication and immersion in their work.
Engagement enhancement and preconditions:
Feedback - creates meaning, and informs of achievements, opportunities for growth;
Trust - important to view assessment as reliable;
Job design;
Leadership;
Coaching;
Supervisor support and training.
Fair PM principles:
1) Procedural Justice - PM process is transparent and fair, employees have input in the process.
2) Distributive Justice - outcomes decided upon are fair, particular rating system used for everyone equally.
3) Interactional Justice - how employees are treated and communicated with during the PM process.
Rating system:
Appraiser rates employee’s performance on a predetermined scale. Typically BARS used, which is a numerical scale rating linked to behavior at work by assessing the relative amount of activity.
Advantage: Simple, focuses on individual objective performance.
Disadvantage: high degree of subjectivity. Can limit employee development.
Ranking system:
Managers rank employees from best to worst, based on specific characteristics or overall job performance.
Advantage: Simple, enables easy comparison between individuals
Disadvantage: criticised on ethical grounds, also performance may not be adequately defined. Does not provide info on what “High performance” means. Promotes aggressive culture.
Relative performance appraisal:
People are ranked compared to one another, outcome thus dependent on people:
1) Ranking: comparing one group to another.
2) Pairwise comparison: comparing group 1 to all the groups, then group 2 to all the groups, etc.
3) Forced distribution: rates distributed on a curve.