week 4 notes

Question 1

what is the rationale for obtaining input and output data for multilingual learners, and how do you obtain this information?

Answer 1

-just bc a child speaks mostly English does not mean they are hearing/receiving input in only English

-obtain data: talking to parents/CG’s as well as teachers about weekdays + what times they speak which language

Question 2

name and describe two normal dual language patterns discussed in class

Answer 2

1. bilingual English dominant (BED)
   * 60-80% English input-output
2. bilingual other dominant (BOD)
   *60-80% other language input-output

Question 3

language confusion in multilingual learners- is this notion fact or myth? explain.

Answer 3

myth; all language learners learn through good input

Question 4

is testing multilingual learners in each language and comparison their scores to monolingual norms in each language in line with EBP?

Answer 4

no; they are not in the monolingual norms. they are not the same as a monolingual English speaker or a monolingual in another language

Question 5

is a speech delay caused by a bilingual language environment?

Answer 5

No!

Question 6

what are the steps of a dynamic assessment?

Answer 6

assess
teach
assessment

Question 7

what are sample recommended report statements for bilingual clients?

Answer 7

converging evidence from multiple sources including the student’s parents/CG’s, teachers, and several assessment measures supports that the child….

Question 8

what is one recommendation for choosing treatment targets for a ML?

Answer 8

choose a treatment that targets goals that address the disorder and that might transfer (considered shared phonemes)

Question 9

what are two key points for the DL McCleod et al. (2017) article?

Answer 9

1. no two multilingual child is the same so individual case histories are important
2. SLP’s may be aware of cultural competence and formal and informal assessment measures are important during assessment

Question 10

what are two key points for the DL Bathina et al. (2023) article?

Answer 10

1. ICS is successful; should be implemented; intelligibility is important for speech
2. translate English document to tramil

Question 11

what are two key points for the DL McCormack et al (2022) article?

Answer 11

1. quasi-experimental; asked children w/ SSD to draw talking
2. children can use art to help communicate their thoughts; deemed successful

Question 12

what is the WHO of multiple oppositions (chapter 4)?

Answer 12

severe phonological impairments in children

Question 13

what is the WHAT of multiple oppositions (chapter 4)?

Answer 13

two things you want to focus on; maximal classification and maximal distinction

Question 14

what is the WHY of multiple oppositions (chapter 4)?

Answer 14

based on two theoretical constructs

Question 15

what is the HOW of multiple oppositions (chapter 4)?

Answer 15

target full phoneme collapse
1. more structured
2. more play

Question 16

what is the WHO of the minimal pairs approach?

Answer 16

children with mild (maybe moderate) phonological disorders

Question 17

what is the WHAT of the minimal pairs approach?

Answer 17

minimal pairs

Question 18

what is the WHY of the minimal pairs approach?

Answer 18

-gestural phonology + simplification
-aims to change the whole system

Question 19

what is the HOW of the minimal pairs approach?

Answer 19

-listen and pick up
-child tells clinician what to pick up
*semantic confusion
-word level -> phrases -> sentences -> convo’s

Question 20

true or false: it is controversial using auditory perceptual learning/training

Answer 20

true