Week 4- evaluate performance Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Q: What is the difference between Criterion deficiency, contamination, and relevance?

A

A: Criterion deficiency- aspects of the job that are sometimes forgotten in criterion (creativity, oral communication)- also hard to measure
Contamination- things that are not explicitly in the criterion but sometimes have an affect (attractiveness, age, status)
Relevance- things that we can measure and are relevant in our criterion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Q: What are the five aspects of good criterion and what do they mean?

A

A: Relevance (overlap between theoretical and actual), sensitivity (ability to distinguish), fairness (employees feel like it’s fair), reliability (consistency), practicality (implementable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Q: What is criterion validity?

A

A: is what I am trying to measure effective without contamination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Q: What are Halo effects?

A

A: rater gives the same level of rating across all dimensions- usually positive ratings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Q: What are central tendency, severity, and leniency effects?

A

A: medium, harsh and positive evaluations for everyone respectively- but not always all dimensions like Halo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Q: What are context effects?

A

A: individuals are rated in comparison to how their group performs- contrast is opposite and assimilation is the same- ex someone is evaluated highly when their group works hard even when they slack

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Q: What are Order effects?

A

A: order of info has an influence on rating- primacy (first info presented has greater effect) and recency (most recent info has more influence)- primacy is more likely in job evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Q: What are Negativity effects?

A

A: more weight is placed on negative info compared to neutral or positive info- usually evaluators are looking for what is bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Q: What are Similar-to-me effects?

A

A: higher ratings to people who have similarities with the evaluator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Q: What are physical attractiveness effects?

A

A: unattractive people receive lower ratings- in some situations attractive women have a disadvantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Q: What are personal liking effects?

A

A: close to similar to me but with more emphasis on a gut feeling of whether or not the evaluator likes the person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q: What are demographic effects?

A

A: older people are rated lower, women in traditionally male roles are rated lower- some recent meta analysis shows more difference in rewards and promotions, black employees worse- effect is small

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Q: What are the aspects of a structured interview?

A

A: Standardized questions from job analysis that are asked to all candidates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Q: What is the difference between past behaviour questions and situational questions in a structured interview?

A

Past behaviour- how candidates responded in the past
Situational- how the candidate might problem solve in a future hypothetical situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Q: What is the validity and reactions of the following selection tools: cognitive ability, personality, interviews, assessment centers?

A

A: Cog ability- high validity and mixed reactions
Personality- moderate to low validity and same reaction
Interview- high validity if done properly and high reaction
Assessment centers- moderate to high validity and high reactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Q: What did Sackett find when they put new constraints on meta analysis on validity of assessments?

A

A: With range restrictions criterion validity is lower than thought. Effect on cognitive ability lowered and so did structured interviews slightly

17
Q

Q: What do we know about transfer and error management?

A

A: You want positive transfer from training to application in the workplace- not neutral or negative- and have it be maintained
Make stimulus and response similar to real job
Supportive culture
How to overcome barriers
Encourage autonomy and risk taking so trainees can learn to do things on their own
Increase motivation to learn
Error management- how to deal with errors when they arise in the most effective way

18
Q

Q: What is the main conclusion from the Grant study?

A

A: Higher goal attainment and wellbeing and resilience with leadership training and individual coaching