Week 3 - The Courts And The Charter Flashcards
Define terms like
- common law
- precedent
- civil law system
- adversarial
What is the Canadian judicial process based on?
The Canadian judicial process (outside Quebec) is based on a system of common law that originates from the U.K.
•Judges make decisions in line with previous precedent
•Contrast to a civil law system where judges act as impartial referees and make decisions (operates in Quebec)
•System is fundamentally adversarial
What are the three types of law?
•Substantive v. procedural
•Constitutional v. statutory v. administrative
•Criminal v. civil
The federal and provincial governments______ ________ in related to the administration of justice.
- what can the federal government do
- criminal code is…?
- provinces are tasked with…?
•Federal government can create courts: power used to create the Supreme Court of Canada (1875) and the Federal Court of Canada (1971)
•Criminal code is federal, unlike in the U.S.
•Provinces tasked with administering justice and creating and maintaining provincial courts
What are the responsibilities of the
- lower provincial courts
- superior courts
- Appeals courts
- Federal courts
•Lower provincial courts assigned frequent, lesser offenses and most matters of civil law
•Superior courts tasked with less common, more serious offenses (e.g., murder)
•Appeals courts are self-explanatory
•Federal Court deals primarily with administrative law and matters that involve the federal government
Appointment:
- superior and appeals courts are appointed by _______
- Lower provincial courts appointed by ________ __________(via _______ __________)
- ____________ common before 1960
•Now procedures exist to limit___________ __________ in appointments (if imperfectly)
•Superior and appeals courts are appointed by cabinet (via the governor general)
•Lower provincial courts appointed by provincial cabinets (via lieutenant governors)
•Patronage common before 1960
•Now procedures exist to limit political influences in appointments (if imperfectly)
Appointment
•Committees in each province provide list of_________ ________ for section 96 judgeships
•Consists of _______ ________, the provincial________ ________ and experts from the legal community
•PM Harper included representative for police
•Provincial court appointments similar at _________ level, but vary by province
•Committees in each province provide list of vetted candidates for section 96 judgeships
•Consists of federal appointees, the provincial attorney general and experts from the legal community
•PM Harper included representative for police
•Provincial court appointments similar at provincial level, but vary by province
How does the removal of judges work?
Very hard to remove judges!
➢Lower courts require removal by provincial cabinet after an inquiry by the provincial judicial council
➢Similar process for federal judges, but also requires passage of motion by Parliament
➢Otherwise, mandatory retirement at 75 for federal judges
History of the Supreme Court
•The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was the final court of appeal until 1949
•SCC created with the Supreme Court Act of 1875 using sec. 101
•Debate over constitutional status because of its creation via statute
•SCC ruled that the Constitution Act of 1982 entrenched the court and its composition requiring unanimous provincial consent to amend
The Supreme Court is tasked with the power of _______ ______? What is this power
What are the two dimensions of the supreme courts power
Tasked with the power of judicial review: the power to review legislation and rule on its constitutionality
Two main dimensions:
•Ultra vires: is the law outside of the scope of power of the government based on the division of powers?
•Does the law infringe on Charter rights beyond reasonable limits?
What is the process of the Supreme Court docket? Appeals are sometimes __________.
•SCC hears cases of public importance and national significance
•All avenues of appeal must be used up and then you must apply for “leave” so that the court hears your case
•3 justices review leave applications and make decisions without providing reasons for a decision
•Appeals are sometimes automatic: acquittal reversals or if there was dissent from an appellate judge
•500-600 applications, only 65-80 appeals (~13%)
•1/3 of docket is Charter cases, most of which involve matters related to criminal law procedures
What is the process of deciding cases? (3)
•Once a decision is reached a justice is selected to write the opinion of the Court to justify the majority decision
•Justices that agree with the decision, but disagree with the reasoning behind the opinion can write concurring opinions
•Those that disagree with the majority opinion can write dissenting opinions
What is the Supreme Court composition? (4 rules)
•Of the nine justices of the Supreme Court, 3 are required to be from Quebec
•2014 reference case further ruled that Quebec appointees must be from a Quebec provincial court or a member of the Bar of Quebec
•By convention, three appointments from Ontario, two from the West, and one from Atlantic Canada
•All must be judges of a superior court of members of the bar for 10 years
What are the rules of Supreme Court Appointment and Tenure
•Appointed by the governor general on advice of the prime minister
•Non-partisan Advisory Board identifies a list of suitable candidates
•Assessment criteria, questionnaires and provided answers are all made public
•Hold office “during good behaviour” with retirement at 75
What is judicial independence and why is it necessary?
•One of the foundational principles of the court system is judicial independence: the need for judges to be politically independent
•While governments can remove judges due to misconduct it is very rare
•Salary and benefits are prescribed by law – individuals cannot be targeted by governments
But to what degree are judges truly “independent”?
•Social and demographic background
•Judicial philosophy and political views
•Public opinion
What are the three main judicial philosophies?
•Textualism – interpret the constitution based solely on the plain meaning of the text
•Originalism – original intent variant leans on interpretation of what the drafters intended by text vs. original meaning, which is the meaning of the text at the time it was drafted (very close to textualism)
•These approaches are favoured by conservative justices, but are not well received in Canadian legal circles
•Living constitution (sometimes called living tree) or interpretivism – drafters couldn’t have known modern-day circumstances, so spirit of the law needs to be considered
•This approach is favoured by Canadian jurists