Week 2 - Federalism Flashcards
Define federalism
•Federalism: systems of government built off of a constitutional division of powers between a central government and lower levels of government.
•Neither level of government is subordinate to the other within their defined jurisdictions.
List the alternatives to federalism
- confederal systems
- unitary systems
What is a confederal system
•Confederal systems: systems of government with multiple levels of government but the central government is dependent on the lower levels for its existence
•(e.g., America under the Articles of Confederation; the European Union)
What is a unitary system
Unitary systems: systems of government where the central government is supreme.
There may be lower levels of government, but they are dependent on the central government for survival
(e.g., UK, France, Sweden)
What isn’t federalism? Define it
Decentralization: the transfer of power to local levels of government regardless of constitutional protections.
•Federations can be more or less centralized. Unitary systems of governments can also be more or less decentralized.
What is the 3 criteria for federalism
A federal state has the following three criteria:
1.Levels of government whose authority cannot be removed unilaterally by one another (split sovereignty).
2.Each level of government is selected independently (e.g. distinct elections).
3.Each level of government has authority on at least one policy area.
Is Canada a federation
➢Can sovereignty of provinces be revoked unilaterally?
No (although federal controls were used until 1961). General amendment formula (Constitution Act, 1982 Sec. 38) requires seven provinces and 50% of the population (7-50 Rule).
➢Are levels of government independent?
Yes. Defined in constitution: federal institutions (Constitution Act, 1867 Sec. 9-53), provincial constitutions (Sec. 58-90).
➢Does each level have at least one area of authority?
Yes. Defined in Sec. 91-92 of Constitution Act, 1867.
List the three benefits to federalism
A substantial literature has developed to test what are seen as normative benefits of federal regimes:
•Responsiveness to citizens
•Laboratories of democracy
•Protections against tyranny
Why is responsiveness a benefit
Perhaps the most cited benefit of federalism is that federal regimes will be more responsive to citizens
•The more local the government, the more accessible they are to ordinary citizens
•Policymakers at sub-national levels may have more information about local conditions
Why is laboratories of democracy a benefit
Federalism also provides advantages through innovation in policy – called “policy learning”
•Policy makers can observe policy choices made in other jurisdictions and learn from successes and avoid failures
•Ex. Health care in Saskatchewan
Why is protection against tyranny a benefit
•Federalism diffuses power and in doing so prevents excessive concentration of power among one group
•It can give institutional power to minority groups for protection from the majority
•Subnational jurisdictions may mirror societal cleavages on language, religion, race or ethnicity, etc.
An important limitation is that such cleavages need to be geographic
•Groups that are more evenly distributed throughout a country won’t be provided such protections (e.g., Indigenous peoples)
•An argument to move beyond geography in conceptualizations of federalism
List the 4 costs associated with federalism
Important to acknowledge costs associated with federal systems:
•Race to the bottom
•Subnational jurisdiction inequality
•Authoritarian enclaves
•Inefficiency
Explain race to the bottom
•Competition between jurisdictions may devolve into a race to lower regulations and tax rates or to give out corporate subsidies
•Called a race to the bottom
Explain jurisdictional inequality
Countries may also have resource endowments that vary considerably.
•Variation in fiscal capacity = variation in quality of public services
•Equalization in Canada
Explain what authoritarian enclaves are
Federalism may allow the continued presence of authoritarian enclaves
•Provincial policy can deny citizens civil rights in response to local public opinion
•E.g., the Jim Crow south