Week 3: revisist Flashcards

1
Q

Pharmacoepidemiology

A

-study of use, risks, and benefits of drugs in populations (not individuals)
-pharma + epidemiology
-studies to estimate beneficial or adverse effects in population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

experimental vs quasi/nonexperimental (observational)

A

-experiment: RCTs
-nonexperimental (observational): case-control, cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

pharmacoepidemiologic and pharmacovigilance studies are primarily ___

A

-observational (nonexperimental)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Applications of pharmepi

A

-new info from premarketing studies
-better info on ADRs (more ppl w more conditions)
-patterns of use
-economic impact
-drug safety
-ethical and legal obligation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Data sources for pharmepi

A

-ADR reports (many go unreported tho)
-medical claims data (private, gov, insurance, some sold by companies): (diagnostic, procedure, lab, rx codes); (not very granular)
-EMRs (granular, but tmi)
-Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Indiana Network for pt care (INPC)

A

->100 separate healthcare entities providing data
-hospital, health networks, insurance providers
->18 million pt
-rx data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Limitations of observational studies in pharmepi

A

-confounding (independently related to BOTH exposure and outcome)
-information bias
-detection bias
-selection bias
-referral bias (encounter due to drug tx)
-protopathic bias (drug initiated before diagnosis)
-prevalence bias
-lag time
-immortal time bias (pt will not survive to measure outcome)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Information bias

A

-related to info regarding exposure/outcome
-includes measurement and/or classification error, or patient reporting/recall
-hawthorne effect: knowing they are being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Detection bias

A

-specific outcome dx preferentially in subjects exposed to agent
-more likely to look for an AE in someone exposed to a drug
-more pt on amiodarone may report more pulmonary toxicity but that is bc they are also being more routinely screened
-investigator detection bias in unblinded studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Confounding by indication

A

-indication for drug or severity of disease predicts use of drug
-ex: ACE preventing MI in pt w HTN (HTN pt w comorbidities like DM are more likely to get ACE than other pt)
-ex: COXIBs and GI bleeds (coxibs reserved for people with higher GI bleed risk, so they might not cause GI bleed, pt just might have ulcer or smth already)

-occurs when risk of event is related to INDICATION for med use but not the use of the med itself
-appears when the REASON of rx is associated w outcome of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Selection bias

A

-bias related to procedures used to select subjects/influence study participation
-due to systematic diff in pt selected for study vs pt not selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Referral bias

A

-reason for encounter related to drug treatment
-ex: use of drug contributes to diagnostic process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

healthy user effect

A

-access to health care resources have higher level of education
-those who are adherent are healthier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Protopathic bias

A

-using drug to treat manifestation of undx disease, but drug may actually cause disease

-ex: antipsychotic started to tx delirium but anticholinergic effects contribute to delirium, NSAID for GI pain that turns out to be ulcer

-“reverse causality”
-occurs if tx was stared, then stopped or changed bc baseline manifestation caused by disease or other outcome event
-occurs when the drug is initiated in response to first sx of disease while still technically undiagnosed

-different than confounding by indication which is when risk is related to indication, not medication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Misclassification effect

A

-classify patient wrong
-missing data also a prob

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Prevalence bias

A

-prevalent cases rather than new (incident) cases are selected
-need to make sure we’re selecting pt that don’t have abnormal baseline for what side effect we’re looking for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

time related biases

A

-lag time
-immortal time bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Lag time bias

A

-ex: PPI in fracture risk
-delayed time to see drug to start working

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

immortal time bias

A

-period of follow-up when outcome being studied could never occur
-if pt died before receiving heart transplant, they were defaulted to non-transplant
-so theres a time between waiting for transplant where transplant group is “immortal” until transplant
-pt in late initiation group had to be inhospital for at least 7 days to be in that group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Pharmacovigilance

A

-CONTINUAL monitoring for unwanted effects and other SAFETY aspects of marketed drugs
-detect, evaluate, understand ADR postmarketing
-wider use of data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Pharmacovigilance programs

A

-FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS): receives postmarketing ADR reports
-FDA Sentinel System: monitor safety of FDA products
-FDA vax adverse event reporting system (FDA VARES)
-FDA started v-safe after covid for ppl to self-report vax adrs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Pharmacovigilance data use

A

-post-marketing surveillance
-signal detection
-data mining (social media)
-often regulatory agencies and industry (FDA)

-get data on pt excluded from premarketing studies, ADRs, similar to phxepi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

phxepi vs pharmavigilance

A

-epi: more hypothesis driven, discrete studies
-vigilance: more ongoing, continuous processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Comparative effectiveness research (CER)

A

-studying interventions in real world settings
-determine what therapeutic intervention (not just drug products) works best for a given disorder in patients likely to be seen in clinical practice
-conduct of research comparing interventions
-multiple study designs rct and observational
-efficacy (ideal) vs effectiveness (real)
-focus on effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Goals of CER

A

-overcome external validity
-compare tx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Efficacy vs effectiveness of CER

A

-efficacy: ideally will drug work
-effectiveness: in real world, does drug work
-focus on effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Pragmatic research

A

-studies that often test small practical changes in real world settings that could have impact on health outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Pragmatic RCTs

A

-RCT w one or more pragmatic element
-intend to overcome limitations of traditional RCTs in order to answer CER questions
-hybrid RCT and routine care design
-intervention is the only thing controlled, everything else happens w clinicians in office

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Pragmatic trial vs RCT

A

-effectiveness
-normal practive
-little selection
-more flexible
-no placebo, usually standard of care is control
-normal adherence
-higher external validity
-real world outcomes
-direct relevance to practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

pharmacoepidemiology opioid example?

A

-aim: estimate incidence and risk factors of pt that abuse opioids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

pharmacovigilance review of fluoroquinolones example

A

-muscle, tendon, neurological effects
-outcome reported as disability
-varying durations
-lead to box warning and indication changes

32
Q

What are primary limitations of RCTs related to applying them to clinical care?

A

-external validity
-comparison to placebo

33
Q

Epidemiology

A

-study of distribution and determinants of health related events in POPULATION
-application of info to control health problems
-distribution: focus on freq and patterns
-frequency: # of events, rate or risk of disease
-patterns: person, place, time

34
Q

Determinants

A

-causes and factors that cause disease
-why/how
-demographics, genetics, immunologic patterns, behaviors, comorbidities, environement, etc
-exposures and outcomes

35
Q

Epidemiology data

A

-used to inform public health efforts
-basic science of pop health
-life expectancy, mortality, etx
-explain disease etiology/cause
-predict disease occurence
-control spread of disease
-assess efficacy of public health efforts
-inform decisions at individual level
-complete clinical picture

36
Q

John snow

A

-cholera in london 1800s
-identified source of outbreak with spot map to find contaminated water
-established steps to investigate disease

37
Q

core epidemiologic functions

A

-public health surveillance (collect mortality reports, identify new diseases or changes in patterns)
-field investigators (environement, food-borne, contact tracing)
-analytic studies llinked to biostatistics
-programmatic evaluation (vax efforts)
-policy development

38
Q

social determinants of health

A

-education access/quality
-economic stability
-health access/quality
-neighborhood/environment
-social/community context

39
Q

time in epidemiology

A

-change in occurence over time
-on graph as rate of disease or number of cases vs time
-rapid changes, seasonal trends, long-term trends
-epidemic period (not limited to infectious disease): time course and epidemic curve

40
Q

Endemic

A

-baseline level of disease found in community for disease that is usually present in community
-expected level of disease over time
-can be high or low

41
Q

Hyperendemic

A

-persistent, high levels of disease

42
Q

Sporadic

A

-disease occurs infrequently and irregularly

43
Q

Epidemic

A

-inc (maybe sudden) in cases above expected
-relative to usual freq of disease
-can be single case of long absent communicable disease
-can be first invasion of disease

44
Q

Pandemic

A

-global epidemic

45
Q

Epidemics

A

-occur when agent and host present in adequate numbers to spread

46
Q

epidemics can result from

A

-inc in amt/virulence of agent
-reintroduction
-change in transmission, susceptibility, exposure

47
Q

Common source outbreak

A

-exposure originates from same source
-point: all exposed at once, sudden, one incubation period, stops unless 2nd spread, steep upslope w gradual downslope (food-borne, nuclear disaster)
-continuous: over time from common source
-intermittent: exposure reemerges over time

48
Q

Propogated outbreak

A

-transmission from person to person
-typical of community outbreaks (can be vehicle,syringe, born or vectorborne,mosquito)
-incubation period
-generation period

49
Q

incubation period

A

-amt of time between initial contact w agent and onset of disease
-may create multiple peaks
-seondary cases appear once incubation period after peak of first wave due to secondary spread
-wanes after a few generations bc number of susceptible people falls below critical number or intervention measures

50
Q

generation period

A

-amt of time between peaks in spread
-(estimate of incubation period)

51
Q

mixed epidemic

A

-common-source outbreak followed by propagated spread

52
Q

COVID-19

A

-incubation period 4-5 days
-provide basis for quarantine recommendations

53
Q

Serial interval

A

-time between successive cases primary to secondary
-interval between clinical onset of disease
-4-7 days for COVID

54
Q

if serial interval < incubation period

A

-can indicate that disease may be transmitted prior to onset of sx

55
Q

incidence

A

-# of new cases of disease that occur over time period
-rate of development of disease

=(# of new cases over time period/total population at risk during same time period): incidence proportion or rate

56
Q

Incidence Rate (IR)

A

-can incorporate person-time
-usually for longer-term follow up
-IR = (# of cases/time each person was observed totalled for all persons)
-decribes how quickly disease occurs
-assumes probability of disease is constant through time period
-report results as cases per person years

57
Q

IR incorporating peron-time example

A

-adult opioid naive pt who received rx between 2012 and 2017
-1.3 mil rx for 341k pt
= incidence of death was 3.52 per 1,000 person-years

58
Q

Prevalence

A

-NOT a RATE
-proportion of ppl w disease at given time or over time period
-total cases in population

=all new and pre-existing cases/population

-number, percentage, per unit size
-proportional to incidence rate and disease duration
-if duration short, prevalence similar to incidence

59
Q

Prevalence is proportional to

A

-incidence rate and disease duration

-if duration is short, prevalence is similar to incidence

60
Q

Attack rate

A

-alt form of incidence rate in outbreak settings
-used for diseases for short times
-often specific exposure (food-borne)
-not a true rate bc time may be unknown
-measure of risk

61
Q

AR (attack rate) formula

A

(# of new cases) / (total population)

62
Q

Secondary attack rate

A

-rate of disease in group among those exposed to initial case
-document transmission in defined/closed population
-index of spread in defined group
-measure contagiousness
-useful in evaluating control measures
-denominator restricted to susceptible contacts

= (# of new cases) / (# of exposed susceptible individuals)

63
Q

secondary attack rate (SAR) formula

A

= (# of new cases) / (# of exposed susceptible individuals)

64
Q

Seoncdary attack rate of covid

A

-16.6%
-harder to measure bc underreporting

65
Q

Basic reproductive number (Ro)

A

-avg number of secondary cases produced by one infected individual introduced into a population of susceptible individuals
-estimates epidemic potential

-<1 disease likely dying out
->1 likely to spread

-depends on location and population density and other factors

66
Q

Basic reproductive number (Ro) in covid

A

-initially around 2
-now less than 1 in Indiana

67
Q

Mortality (or morbidity) rate

A

-freq of death
= (deaths/population) x 10^n

-denominator can vary (vital stats, may use size of population in middle of time period
-can report number per 1,000 or 100,000

68
Q

mortality rate variations

A

-crude mortality rate (all causes)
-cause-specific
-age-specific
-infant mortality rate (<1 year of age/# of live births)
-maternal mortality rates
-race specific
-age adjusted

69
Q

Case fatality rate

A

-proportion of people with a given condition who dies from condition
-proportion not a tre rate
-indication of VIRULENCE in population
-how fatal is disease
-compare fatality to other diseases
= [(# of cause specific deaths among incident cases) / (# of incidence cases)] x 10^n

70
Q

CFR for COVID-19

A

-around 1%
-need better data tho
-but flu CFR was 0.1%

71
Q

Risk ratio (relative risk)

A

-measures of association in cohort study
-risk of outcome (disease) among one group with risk or exposure, among another group w/o risk or exposure

=risk of disease in group of interest / risk of disease of comparator
=indicdence of disease in exposed / incidence of disease in unexposed

-dont need to calculate
-outcome could be good tho

72
Q

Rate ratio

A

-compares INCIDENCE RATES between 2 groups (cohort study)
-may include person-time
=rate for group A/ rate for group B

73
Q

statistical significance indicated by

A

-95% Cl
-not sig if includes 1
->1 is higher risk
-<1 is lower risk

74
Q

Odds ratio (OR)

A

-used for CASE CONTROL studies
-estimates relative risk
-don’t use RR in case control since we don’t know total population

= odds of exposed person being a case / odds of unexposed person being a case

-95% Cl