Week 2 [Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010] Flashcards

1
Q

What are some key issues (2) of the traditional approach that firms locate near one another?
[Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]

A
  1. ‘Geographically proximity’ (be in the neighborhood) is necessary to promote social learning, but not sufficient to generate interaction (between agents)
  2. ‘Interaction’ does not necessarily lead to positive spillovers (might lose knowledge, or -> if all info is shared, what is your C.A.?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are three (3) key factors of MNE location choice (why do they hang out next to each other)?
[Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]

A
  1. Endowment effects
  2. Agglomeration effects
  3. Policy-induced effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are ‘endowment effects’?

[Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]

A

Certain activities are naturally drawn to a given location

  • E.g. Canada - has wood - paper factory
  • E.g. Rotterdam - has port - shipping company
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are ‘agglomeration effects’?

[Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]

A

Cost-effective access to specialized inputs and to knowledge spillovers

  • E.g. Dublin, knowledge spillovers
  • E.g. Silicon Valley, Shenzhen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are ‘policy-induced effects’?

[Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]

A

Governments subsidize the relocation to certain areas
- E.g. Brainport Eindhoven
- E.g. Kuala Lumpur tech town next to circuit
Bc; knowledge spillover -> higher income (more tax) ppl working for companies (willing to invest in e.g. infrastructure)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is meant by ‘location cascades’?

[Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]

A

MNEs imitate other MNEs as a result of information externalities
- E.g. follow IBM as “they must know what they are doing”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by ‘centrifugal and centripetal forces’?

[Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]

A

MNEs may not co-locate with domestic companies as a result of knowledge spillovers.
- E.g. next to the international IBM… but not next to locals to avoid knowledge spillover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“MNEs decision-making regarding location is strongly influenced by ‘information externalities and knowledge spillovers’ “

What are two (2) examples of information externalities and knowledge spillovers?

A
  1. Location cascades

2. Centrifugal and centripetal forces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What can be said about ‘information externalities’?

[Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]

A

MNEs entering a foreign country suffer from uncertainty and experience information asymmetries that result in high information costs
- Learning is key to minimize these information costs (e.g. Learn from other MNEs’ experience and adopt a mimetic behavior)
-
H1: MNEs are more likely to agglomerate w/ other MNEs due to uncertainty in the local context and the relevant information costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What can be said about ‘knowledge spillovers?’

[Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]

A

H2a: not agglomerate w/ domestic companies (knowledge outflows>inflows)
2b: 2a does not hold if domestics are comparatively advanced
2c: do agglomerate as potential knowledge spillover increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a limitation of the sample of [Mariotti, Piscitello & Elia, 2010]?

A

Data only from Italian MNEs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly