Week 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Reliability

A

Consistency across time (do same answers give same results every time?)
- inter-judge relaibility: do have judges same level of skill to judge you?
-methods always contain noise or unreliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Validity

A

Do we measure what we want to measure?
- no reliability, no validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Content validity

A

Is method representative of job?
- how well is reflection/prediction
- necessary but not sufficient (high content validity may not predict high criterion-related validity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Criterion validity

A

How well does selection method predict X?
- predictive validity: can scores measure a predition/correlation? Harder to determine, large sample size to see whether test has future predicitive power
- concurrent validity: are scores related to the measures variable, easy to determine with current employees with current employees (might not represent future employees)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Utility

A

what is the practical economic value of a selection method?
1. costs
2. variability of performance (if high, then utility is high)
3. selection ratio: number of job positions to number of applicants (who is in power?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Legality

A

make sure selection method does not reduce changes of specific groups of people from getting hired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cognitive ability test

A

selection method to assess general mental ability
- test-taking ability also matters
- culture bound or free?
- moderate correlation with job performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Personality tests

A

selection method to assess personality traits
- Big Five (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism) to quantify personalities. Strongest predictor is conscientiousness
- MBTI (Thinker or Feeler), vague description and positive results but low reliability (do not use)
- Dark Triad: access harmful traits (Narcissism, Psychopathy and Machiavellanism) and to prevent harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Integrity test

A
  • Overt: attitude towards theft and admission of wrongdoing
  • personality oriented: items about dependability, conscientiousness, social conformity, thrill seeking, trouble with authority and hostility
  • Conditional Reasoning Test: how do people justify their behavior?
  • PROBLEM: can be inflated by faking and coaching
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Interviews

A
  • structured (medium correlation)
  • unstructured (less correlation)
  • semi-structures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

References and Letters of recommendations

A
  • mostly positives, few negatives (limited information about the actual review), redundant
  • should focus on specific skills and relevant aspects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Work sample test

A
  • test technical and practical expertise
    comparability when asking them to perform the exact same task
  • highest correlation so far
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Other selection methods

A
  • physical ability test
  • language proficiency test
  • drug test
  • assessment centers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Picking selection method

A
  • pick combination of cognitive ability test and one other
  • cognitive ability as base as it has high predictive validities, easy to administer, one of the most validated and can be applied to several jobs
  • small overlaps between test bring bigger predictive validity than big overlaps
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Perceptual Error/Decoy effect

A

irrelevant 3rd option influences how people decide between two viable options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Social Desirability

A

people say what they think others want to hear (male and older applicants have higher social desirability)

17
Q

Fundamental attribution error

A

attribute behavior and discounting the situational effect
- behavior is product of both

18
Q

Halo effect

A

rate favorable because of high rating on different aspect

19
Q

Horns effect

A

rate unfavorable because of low rating on different aspect

20
Q

Similarity/Liking

A

Rate those who are similar to us favorably

21
Q

Face validity

A

Important that application process is perceived as fair and that the tests are relevant for selection
- effects intention to accept job offer
- could cause doubts

22
Q

Effects of face validity beyond selection process

A
  • employer branding: will applicants recommend company?
  • view the organization favorable: can harm image
  • effects applicants durther intention to buy or use products