week 11 Flashcards

1
Q

general intelligence tests are more predictive of performacne in what phase?

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

perceptual-speed abilities are more prediucitive of performance in phase??

A

2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

psychomotor abilities are more predictive in phase ?

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

shams et 2000

A

discovered the sound-induced flash illusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

not everyone has the same temporal binding window (TBW)

A

there are some individual variations, and individual differences in temporal binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

does variation exist in individual experiences with the sound-induced flash illusion

A

yes, but they may be too small at the neurophysiological level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what can we use to understand perceptual thresholds

A

behavioral methods
- asking people when the flash then measuring that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the temporal binding window

A
  • varies between participants
  • can be determined experimentally using psychophysics (operant conditioning)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how could you determine the perceptual threshold for an individual

A

“percecing them as 2 different events”
- stair case method
- find out what the minimum present the 2 stimuli at different time until they get the time they know there is 2 stimuli
- if the person knows there is 2 stimuli, switch up the order of times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

on a psychometric curve - stimulus intensity at threshold

A
  • point at which ppl at 50%
  • able to detect stimulus (its measuring threshold of when 50% of ppl can detect the stimulus)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

signal detection theory- determing thresholds how?

A

variablitiy in detection thresholds (and binding windows) can be determined mathecmatically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

gaussian distribution

A

how variability in detection thresholds is determined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

about gaussian distribution

A

noise on one side signal+noise on the other
- need to seperate signal and noise
- can help figure out how long to detect signal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

to detect a stimulus, individuals select a crterion

A

if the perceived intentsity is greater than the criterion
if the perceived intensity is less than the criterion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

if the perceived intensity is greater than the criterion

A

stimulus is detected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

if the perceived intensity is less than the criterion

A

stimulus is undetected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

possible outcomes

A

hit
false alarm
correct rejections
miss

18
Q

hit

A

correct response

19
Q

false alarm

A

incorrect yes
- we say a signal is there but its actually just noise
- no signal

20
Q

correct rejection

A

correct no
- no presence of stimulus

21
Q

miss

A

incorrect no
- signal is presented but just noise is identified

22
Q

individual difference in sensory processing

A
  • interested in variation sensory thresholds
23
Q

what is d-prime

A

a measure of sensitivity and estimates the standardized difference between the mean of 2 distributions

24
Q

%hits

A

proportions of hits (hits/total presentations )

25
Q

%false alarms

A

proportion of false alarms (flase alarms/non-presentations

26
Q

convent proportions to Z-scores using Z-tables

A

d= Z (%hits)- Z (%false alarms)

27
Q

what does calulating d- prime help with

A

interpretating individual difference in sensory integration

28
Q

each individuals nervous system

A

use differnt criteria
- can reflect a combination of individual differences in strategy and processing

29
Q

stevenson et al, 2012

A

investigated if individual difference in the perception of McGurk stimulus could be related to variability in the temporal binding window of participants

30
Q

results of stevenson 2012 - left window

A
  • no relationship between perception McGurk effect and left temporal binding window
31
Q

results of stevenson 2012 - right window

A

individual with shorter temporal binding had higher likely hood of precepting the McGurk effect

32
Q

how did stevenson use to determine the TBW

A

pscyhophysics

33
Q

what do most motor control and learning paradigms use

A

individual differences analyses as supplementary analyses

34
Q

individual differences analyses as supplementary analyses

A

when no group differnce are found, researchers often look for individual differences

35
Q

Lebar et al, 2015

A

examined participants brain response to visual stimuli during a mirror-reversed drawing tasks

36
Q

results of lebar et al, 2015

A
  • did not find any difference in brain response to visual stimuli in mirror-reversed vs normal drawing conditions
37
Q

results of lebar et al, 2015 high performers

A

showed increased visual cortex activation during drawing when compared to low performers

38
Q

how can we design an experiment to examine if high performers’ really do show increases in brain activity

A
  • training-studies
  • between-group differences
39
Q

example of a between group studies

A

test art students compared to kin students
meausre brain activity

40
Q

example of training studies

A

pre and post measure’s
- measure before then send to training art school then measure after the training