Week 10 - Leadership, Power & Politics Advocacy Flashcards

1
Q

define/explain: 3 types of leaders

A
  1. Visionary leader, individual with vision/goal, conveys this vision to others and gets their support
  2. Facilitator, individual without personal vision, helps others identify their own goals
  3. Intermediate model:
    - Often used in professional fields (where the process is teamwork-based)
    - Individuals may have their own personal goals or visions; however, they are willing to work with others to best define the objective and its implementation plan
    - Leadership shifts as needed to enhance the process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define/explain: 3 Levels of Leadership

A
  1. Formal, Boards of Directors, etc.
  2. Intermediate, Committee Chairs, project leaders, etc.
  3. Individual, Demonstrate initiative, self-management, commitment to the mission
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define/explain: 3 directions of leadership

A
  1. Leading up, add value to the organization
  2. Leading across, respect your peers and help them be successful
  3. Leading down, set clear expectations and model appropriate behaviours
    - help your followers develop and improve
    - value followers – praise and reward good behaviours
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define: traits of professional leadership

A
  • Low hierarchy
  • Based on consensus-building
  • Ability to cope with single issues, yet see the overall picture
  • Comprehensive view of decision-making
  • Individuals within the system are valued
  • Collaborative approach is important
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define/explain: the importance of leadership in collaborative efforts in HEc

A
  • supportive communities are essential for creating systems that nurture families
  • complex problems do not respond to ‘cookbook’ solutions
  • necessary to have an integrative and inter-connected model
  • collaboration empowers communities to address their issues & problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define: lobbying

A

-strategy which seeks to change the point of view of government, politicians, civil servants, public – often conducted by paid professionals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define/explain: advocacy

A
  • usually involves getting government, business, schools, or some other large institution to correct an unfair or harmful situation affecting people in the community
  • the active promotion of a cause or principle
  • involves actions that lead to a selected goal
  • one of many possible strategies or ways to approach a problem, ex. can be used as part of a community initiative along with other components
  • not direct service, ex. serving food to homeless
  • does not have to involve confrontation or conflict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define: advocacy

A

-usually involves getting government, business, schools, or some other large institution to correct an unfair or harmful situation affecting people in the community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

define: politics aka polis

A

-controlling or influencing power; there is also a political aspect to all areas of life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

define: power

A

-the control of resources (money, goods, services, information, technology, etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define: policies

A
  • criteria for making decisions about the allocation of resources
  • guide our actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

describe: 3 steps to influence the political agenda

A

Step 1: Diagnose the political nature of a health issue
Step 2: Understand key political decision makers
Step 3: Decide what to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe: how to diagnose the political nature of a health issue

A
  • Place the issue into a salience category:
    1. High - public priority, media coverage, party priority
    2. Medium - limited priority for public and gov’t, ltd media att’n
    3. Low – no surveys, media, or discussion by key politicians
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe: questions to ask to understand key political decision makers when influencing political agenda

A
  • What government organization has the authority to make the decision?
  • Who has the authority to make the decision?
  • When is the best time to consider the issue?
  • How will the decision be made?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

describe/explain: differences in strategies when influencing political agenda for high, medium and low salience issues

A
  1. High salience issues involve major proposals
    - Media campaigns; opinion/editorial articles in newspapers; mobilization of grassroots organizations to send letters, emails
  2. Medium salience issues involve incremental or technical proposals
    - Experts usually provide advice to policy makers
  3. Low salience issues need longer-term strategies
    - HCPs can provide advice to politicians, establish a relationship with a journalist, conduct research, and elect policy makers who will promote healthcare/social/family issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Discuss the state of women in politics in Canada

A
  • women make up less than 25 percent of elected officials in Canada
  • our country ranks 55th out of 189 countries for percentage of women in elected office
  • we’re behind Rwanda, Kazakhstan, Uganda, Afghanistan, and Iraq
  • only 26% of federal MPs are women
17
Q

what are helpful strategies for potential advocates?

A
  • employ survival skills, display a positive attitude and approach; check facts; compromise if necessary; be passionate and creative
  • understand the issue
  • recognize allies (balance benefits against risks)
  • identify opponents and resistance
  • encourage involvement of potential opponents as well as allies
  • develop a plan for advocacy