Week 10 - Judgement And Decision Making Flashcards
Definition of Judgement and Decision Making
JUDGEMENT = What is happening , evaluating , accuracy
DECISION MAKING = Choosing what action to take , deciding on a course of action , consideration of consequences
Features of normative vs descriptive theories
NORMATIVE = set of rules , norms , specific correct processes / solutions
DESCRIPTIVE = how judgements and decisions are made , specific sources of solutions
Judging Likelihood Study : (Tversky and Kageman)
- Ppts told taxicab involcved in hit and run
- 85% taxis green company , 15% blue
- Eyewitness identified as blue but she was only correct 80% of time
- Most common answer of ppts = 80%
[ base rates outweigh the witness testimony]
Formula for Bayes Theorem
Calculating the probability of a hypothesis given after observing some data
p(D|H) = How likely data we would be if hypothesis is TRUE
P(H)= how likely the hypothesis is regardless of data
P(D)= How likely the data are regardless of all hypothesis
P(H|D) = P(D|H)P(H)
_____________
P(D)
Explain Neglect of Base Rates
[BASE RATE = RELATIVE FREQ OF AN EVENT IN A GIVEN POPULATION]
- People fail to take base rates into account when making judgements : focus on likelihood
- In medical diagnosis need to focus on rarity on disease and accuracy (more likely false pos.)
Explain the Heuristic Approach to Judgement
[Strategies that ignore part of the information to make decisions more quickly than more complex methods- efficient but not guaranteed accuracy]
- Many judgement errors result from reliance on heuristics
- Example of DESCRIPTIVE theory
Representative Heuristic
- Judgements of likelihood the same regardless of base rate
- Mental shortcut we use in estimating probabilities
Availability Heuristic
- Estimating frequencies of events of how easy / difficult is is to retrieve relevant info from LTM
- More congnitively available info = judged more likely
- eg. Cause of death attracting most publicity (murder) are judged more likely than those who don’t even when less likely
Strengths of Heuristic Approach
+ Evidence for heuristic use
+ People are prone to systematic biases
Limitations of Heuristic approach
- Unclear how they reduce effort
- Errors may be made as ppts misunderstand parts of the problem
Explaining judgement errors
- Distinguish between events and descriptor of events
- Event Framing [ irrelevant factors affect likelihood]
- Explicit may draw attention to less obvious
Overview of Dual Processing Models
- Not all judgements are the same
- We approach judgement in 2 ways : rapidly but intuitive and slowly but selectively
- Debate if good judgements come from system 1 / 2
4 factors decisions are made from
1 = Rational Reasoning
2= Heuristics-based reasoning
3= Emotions
4= Context : habits , needs , preference , time , information
We want a good outcome
Explain Utility Theory (Decision Making)
- NORMATIVE theory , we maximise utility (value)
- We should use logic , probability , and stats that produce constant results
Expected utility = (probability of outcome) * (subjective value attached to that outcome)
Explain Bounded Rationality
- DESCRIPTIVE theory , proposes idea of bounded rationality
- Cognitive resources , within bounds we make rational decisions, focus on explaining decisions with limited consideration
- Satisficing by choosing good enough not best