Week 10 Flashcards

1
Q

Cerebral Lateralisation

A

Brains are asymmetrical
• Anatomically (gross and micro level)
• Neurochemically
• Functionally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Anatomical Asymmetry

A
• Right further forward
• Left further back
• Right frontal wider
• Left occipital wider
• Longitudinal fissure to
right of midline (post)
and left (ant)
Perisylvian asymmetry
• Left sylvian fissure longer and less
sloped
• Left Wernicke larger
• Neurons in left Broca more synaptic
connections
• Left angular gyrus larger
• Right parietal area larger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Neurochemical Asymmetry

A
Left - dopamine
• Basal ganglia – complex motor
• Right handedness
Right – noradrenaline
• Thalamus – arousal system
• Maintains alertness
• Integrates bilateral perceptual information
• Spatial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Functional Asymmetry

A

People are NOT left brain or right brain
• Biases rather than absolute differences
• Language most lateralised of cognitive abilities, but not
total
• Handedness
• Apraxia almost always with left lesions, but bilateral
symptoms
• Neglect – mostly right lesions / left neglect
• Differences between people – correlated with
handedness and gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Functional Asymmetry

A
Left
• Language – speech,
reading, writing,
arithmetic
• Complex movement
• Word recognition (FWA)
• Recognition of local
features
Right
• Language – emotional
content
• Spatial – mental
rotation, geometry,
direction, distance
• Facial recognition (FFA)
• Global features
Handedness
• 10% left handed
• 70% of left handed have same lateralisation as right
hander (15% reversal; 15% bilateral)
• 97% right handers but 70% left handers have left
language
• Left language emerged from left dominance of motor??
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cerebral Lateralisation

A

• Lateralization conserved or independently acquired
during evolution suggests it provides an advantage
• MRI studies correlate the strength of functional
lateralization with the level of cognitive ability
• Brain lateralization might provide benefits by allowing
the hemispheres to perform parallel tasks
• Reflect evolutionary, hereditary, developmental,
experiential, and pathological factors
• Variation in the development of brain asymmetry is
suspected to contribute to various
neuropathologies
• Autism and dyslexia are associated with atypical
patterns of functional and structural asymmetries
• Left- or mixed-handedness increased from 10% in
the general population to 20% - 40% in
schizophrenic patients.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Language Introduction

A

• Communication – transfer of information by speech,
signals, writing, or behaviour
• Function of language – influence behaviour of others
by changing what they know, think, believe, or desire
• Language depends on rules rather than learning
sequences and/so is generative (can create and
understand endless variations)
• Animals – complex songs or distinct warning calls for
different threats but don’t combine calls for new ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Animal Communication - Vocal

A

• Calls with specific meaning (e.g. vervet monkeys)
• Snake call – stand up and look down
• Leopard call – scamper into trees
• Bird call – run from exposed branches to huddle near trunk
• Not just reflexive reactions to situations – depend on
social context
• Vervet monkeys don’t make alarm calls if no other
monkeys nearby – more likely if nearby are relatives
• Production vs comprehension – best animals can
produce only a few calls but most animals can
understand/interpret lots of environmental sound -
comprehension seems older and widespread
• Vocal – involuntary signals associated with
emotional state in response to specific stimulus
and broadcast to group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Animal Communication - Gestural

A

• More flexible and non-urgent
• initiate playing and grooming with a specific individual
• some learned socially
• Gestures require knowing the attentional state of
the partner – shared attention
• Little cortical control over vocalisations
• Excellent cortical control over hands and arms
• Language evolved from gestural (Tomasello;
Corballis)?
• Teaching chimps sign language rather than to speak
• Chimps and bonobos have right hand preference
(left hemisphere) for communication gestures but
not for non-communicative gestures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Language Functional Levels

A

• Basic sounds (phonemes) create sematic units
(morphemes) – smallest grammatical unit
• Morpheme can be a word but not necessarily – e.g.
‘bookkeepers’ has 4 morphemes – ‘book’ and ‘keep’;
‘er’ and ‘s’
• Each language has set of phonemes and rules to
combine to create morphemes and words (‘zb’)
• Words combined by rules of syntax into sentences
(grammar includes syntax and other stuff)
Prosody
• The patterns of stress and intonation in a language
• Prosodic cues – pitch, duration and loudness changes
• Linguistic information in tonal languages (e.g. Chinese,
Vietnamese, Thai) (left hemisphere)
• Paralinguistic information – emotion (right hemisphere)
• Task of understanding
• Decode auditory stream into phonemes
• Join phonemes appropriately into morphemes
• Build morphemes into words and words into sentences
• Extract conceptual meaning from words, order,
context, prosody, earlier sentences
• Task of production
• Essentially the reverse
• Translate high-level concepts into string of phonemes
then accurately produce the sounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Language Acquisition

A

• Easily acquire language – just need exposure (reading –
have to actively learn)
• Acquisition in children follows a universal pattern and
typically developing master by 3 years
• Skinner – language acquired through learning –
monitoring and management of reward (reinforcement
learning)
• Chomsky - innate language faculty with universal
grammar and phonetics, exposure to a specific
language triggers selection process
• Recent – not quite either – learning but different to
external shaping and reinforcement
• Learn language through detailed and sophisticated
analysis of the language they hear to reveal
underlying patterns; learning the patterns then
alters perception to favour the native language
• Listening to language alters infant brain early in
development
• Speech perception and speech production develop in
parallel (perception leads production)
• Universal infant then specialise to native language
• Universal perception before 6 months - discern slight
acoustic changes at phonetic boundaries for all
languages (adult only for fluent language)
• Universal production before 10 months – babble then
specific language patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Speech Production

A

• Well before produce words, learn sound patterns
underlying phonetic units, words and phrase
structure of language they hear
• Just before first words – non-native discrimination
declines rapidly but native improves significantly –
become specialist
• 10 months – no speech (babble)
• 12 months – 50 words and begin to produce
speech that resembles native language
• Approach 24 months – mimic sound patterns of
native – pitch, rhythm
• 3 years – 1000 words (adult 70k) and can create
long sentences and have a conversation
• Prosodic cues – pitch, duration and loudness changes –
learn global sound patterns early (prosodic patterns
transmitted in utero but sound patterns for words not)
• 7-8 months recognise words using probability that one
syllable follows another – probabilities between syllables in
a word are high (‘ta’ follows ‘po’ in potato) but between
words are low (‘po’ follows ‘hot’ in hot potato)
• 9 month old show listening preference for native, 6 month
not
• 30 months – readily discriminate only sounds that compose
language exposed to (native language)
• Expose American
infants (9-10 months)
to Mandarin
• Learn if interaction
with human
• Not if same material
through TV or audio
• Human group as good
as infants raised in
Taiwan for full 10
months
• Motherese (parentese) – higher pitch, slower
tempo, exaggerated intonation when speaking to
infants and young children
• Fairly universal
• Given a choice, infants prefer listening to parentese
over adult-speak

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Critical Period

A

• Second half of the first year - learning native language
produces neural commitment to acoustic patterns –
tuning
• Maturation sets the time when the learning window
opens
• Experience determines when the window closes
• Neural commitment enhances ability to detect learned
patterns and reduce ability to detect those that don’t
conform
• Motor patterns for native language interfere with
efforts to pronounce new language - accent
• Once discrimination to non-native language lost (30
months) hard to regain (learning a language as an
adult)
• Second language learning improved by training that
mimics early acquisition
• Long periods of listening in social context (immersion)
• Use of auditory and visual information
• Exposure to simplified and exaggerated speech (parentese)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lateralisation

A

• Left lateralisation of language in 95%
• Left specialised for phonetic, word and sentence
processing (separate production and
comprehension areas)
• Prosody engages left and right depending on
information conveyed – linguistic (semantic
information in tonal languages) left; emotional,
right
• Right lesions can produces emotionally flat speech
with inappropriate stress, timing and intonation
(also fail to interpret emotional cues in others
speech)
• Right also in discourse – meaning over many
sentences – right lesions difficulty in ordering
sentences into coherent narrative; problems
understanding when meaning requires
relationships among sentences (e.g. fail to get
jokes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Classical Model

A

• Language circuits and areas first identified through
studies of aphasia (no animal models, imaging recent)
• Aphasia
• Language deficits (comprehension and/or production)
• Neurological damage but articulatory mechanisms intact
• Loss of control of articulatory muscles is dysarthria
• Problems with motor planning of speech is apraxia
• 40% of all strokes produce some aphasia but may be
transient
• Begin with Broca – inferior portion of left PFC is
centre for speech production (Broca’s area - BA)
• Wernicke – language area in left temporal lobe just
posterior to A1 is the centre of language
comprehension (Wernicke’s area - WA)
• WA is connected to BA via the arcuate fasciculus
(AF)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Classical Model - Wernicke

A

• Lesion of BA should produce expressive aphasia
• Normal comprehension of spoken and written
• Speech production impacted
• Retain meaning but slow, laboured, disjointed, poorly
articulated
• Lesion of WA should produce receptive aphasia
• Poor comprehension of speech and writing
• Speech that is meaningless but normal sounding in structure,
rhythm, intonation (word salad)
• Lesion of AF should produce conduction aphasia
• Comprehension and spontaneous speech ok
• Difficulty repeating words

17
Q

Broca’s Aphasia

A

• Anterior, non-fluent, expressive, agrammatic
• Most severe – single utterance patterns (like ‘tan’) but
large variability
• Sometimes can still sing
• ‘Telegraphic speech’ – uneven bursts and effortful
• Aware of errors (comprehend) and get frustrated
• Often accompanied by apraxia of speech
• Can have comprehension deficits related to syntax
(rules) – agrammatic aphasia (only most basic grammar
produced and comprehended)
• e.g. ‘the boy kicked the girl’ vs ‘ the boy was kicked by
the girl’ – first easy due to word order, second hard

18
Q

Wernicke’s Aphasia

A
  • Posterior or receptive
  • Primarily a disorder of language comprehension
  • Fluent speech, normal rate, rhythm, intonation
  • Disturbances of sounds, structures of words
  • Semantic substitutions or paraphasias
  • ‘Word salad’
  • Poor repetition, naming
19
Q

Conduction Aphasia

A

• A disconnection syndrome
• Understand words see or hear and can hear their
own speech errors but can’t fix them
• Disturbance of repetition, cant easily name
pictures or objects, difficulty assembling phonemes
(speech production only slightly affected)

20
Q

Broca’s Aphasia - Spontaneous

A

Non-fluent,
effortful
Comprehension
largely preserved

21
Q

Primary Aphasias - Repetition

A

Repeat the phrase – “The pastry cook was elated”
Broca’s Aphasia: “Elated”
Wernicke’s Aphasis: “/I/ … no …. In a fog”
Conduction Aphasia: “The baker was … what was that last
word?” repeat phrase “The baker-er was / vaskerin / …uh …”

22
Q

Wernicke-Geschwind Model

A

• Aphasia findings plus new data and interpretations by
Geschwind in 1960’s and ’70’s
• BA, WA, and AF plus auditory (A1), visual (V1), and
motor (M1)areas
• Angular gyrus (AG) for reading – translates visual word
form into auditory code
• Patients with pure alexia (cant read) and agraphia (cant
write) had damage to pathway connecting visual cortex and
AG (Dejerine)
• 7 component serial processing model?
• Right hemisphere
• STS (prosody)
• PFC, MTG
• Posterior cingulate cortex (metaphorical meaning)
• Production, perception and comprehension involve
motor and timing – all cortical and subcortical motor
(PMC, SMA, M1, thalamus, BG, CB)
• Semantic and conceptual information possibly stored
all over the brain and must be accessed

23
Q

Classical Model - Problems

A

• Most initial details and ideas from patients with stroke,
tumours, penetrating brain injuries
• Imprecise – diffuse, white matter involvement
• More recent
• Surgery – precise cortical excision
• Functional imaging (PET, fMRI, EEG, MEG)
• Electrical stimulation (surgery patients)
• Problems with the classical model
Surgery
• Remove all BA but little surrounding – some initial
speech problems but subside fairly quickly – result of
swelling into nearby areas
• No permanent speech problems with discrete
sectioning of AF
• No permanent alexia/agraphia from discrete cortical
lesioning of AG
• Significant portions of WA removed without speech
impact
• Larger lesions produce more lasting effects than
smaller
Imaging of aphasic patients
• None have damage restricted to BA or WA
• Significant subcortical white matter damage
• Large anterior lesions more likely to produce
expressive symptoms, large posterior, receptive
symptoms
• Some patients no damage to classical model areas
– only medial frontal lobe, subcortical white
matter, BG, thalamus
Localised electrical stimulation
• Stimulation blocked or disrupted speech scattered
throughout large area of frontal, temporal, parietal
cortex
• No tendency for particular kind of speech disturbance
from particular cortical area
• Right hemisphere stimulation essentially no disruption
Localised electrical stimulation
Bavellier et al (1997) – fMRI of silent reading
• Alternate silent reading with control periods – strings of
consonants
• Subtraction to determine reading activity (lateral cortex
only)
• Patchy areas of activity
• Variable – across participants and across trials for same
participant
• Included classical model areas, but much more widespread
• Some right activity but mostly left
• Silent reading – predict no activity in Broca and motor

24
Q

Bavellier et al (1997)

A

Average across participants creates a false impression of
large homogeneous expanses – on any given trial only
5% to 10% of this – small, localised regions

25
Q

Classical Model

A

Small number of large connected brain regions dedicated
to language unlikely and not supported by evidence
But ….
• Highly lateralised (nearly always to left)
• Broca’s area and Wenicke’s area play important roles
• Anterior damage more expressive, posterior damage more
receptive
• Provides a useful framework for understanding and
investigating language

26
Q

Cognitive Neuro of Language

A

3 premises
• Language behaviours like speech, comprehension, or
reading made up of constituent cognitive processes – it
is these processes that may be organised separately in
different parts of the brain rather than the behaviours
• Brain areas involved in language not dedicated solely to
that
• Areas likely to be small, widely distributed and
specialised (unlike BA, WA, AG)
Constituent cognitive processes
• Phonological analysis – analysis of the sound of
language
• Grammatical analysis – analysis of the structure of
language
• Semantic analysis – analysis of the meaning of
language

27
Q

Processes

A
Grammatical
Analysis of
structure
Phonological
Analysis of
sound
Semantic
Analysis of
meaning
28
Q

Semantic Processing & N400

A

• ERP component - N400 especially sensitive to
semantic aspects
“After pulling the fragrant loaf from the oven, she cut
a slice and spread the warm bread with socks”
• Semantically anomalous words illicit a greater
response – N400 effect
• Non-semantic deviations (e.g. grammar violations)
have no N400 effect
• Broca’s and
Wernicke’s aphasics
– high and low
comprehension
• Low comprehension
have reduced and
delayed N400 effect
• Impaired at
integrating lexical
information into
meaning

29
Q

More Models

A

• Domasio & Domasio – 3 large interacting systems
connect reception and production with conceptual
knowledge
• Implementation system – BA, WA, parts of insular
cortex, basal ganglia
• Mediational system – surrounds implementation
system, separate regions in temporal, parietal and
frontal association areas
• Conceptual system – collection of regions throughout
association areas
• Implementation system – analyse incoming
auditory to activate conceptual knowledge,
support phonemic and grammatical construction
and control speech production
• Mediational system – mediates between
implementation and conceptual systems
• Conceptual system – meaning of words and
concepts

30
Q

Beyond the Classical Model

A

• Constituent cognitive processes
• Expanded roles for Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas
• Arcuate fasciculus bidirectional connecting larger areas of
sensory cortex with prefrontal and premotor areas
• Additional left cortical areas important (association areas in
temporal, parietal and frontal) for connecting word and
concept processing
• Other prefrontal and cingulate areas exert executive control
• Left insular cortex involvement in both speech production
and perception – possibly co-ordinating higher-level
cognitive aspects
• Subcortical involvement
• Bidirectional connections with feedback

31
Q

Key Learnings

A

• Brains are asymmetrical - anatomically (gross and
micro level), neurochemically, functionally
• Biases rather than absolute differences but
provides advantages
• Language versus animal communication
• Gestures – animals have little cortical control over
vocal, but a lot of control of gestures
• Phonemes/morphemes/words/sentences
• Prosody provides emotional information generally
but also linguistic information in tonal languages
• Language is learned through immersion
• Critical period – universal infant specialises to language
exposed to – neural commitment
• Classical model by considering aphasias – Broca’s
(expressive), Wernicke’s (receptive), conduction (repetition)
• Wernicke-Geschwind model – 7 components
• Problems with the classical model – surgery, functional
imaging, electrical stimulation, but – a useful framework
• Constituent cognitive processes – phonological,
grammatical, semantic analysis
• Domasio & Domasio Implementational / meditational /
conceptual systems