Week 1 Flashcards
Group vs Team
Group: Social interaction among individuals + one or more common causes
Team: you add
-one or more common tasks
-interdependence (workflow, goals, outcomes)
-different roles and responsibilities
-part of a larger organization system
Group entitativity (Nijstad)
The degree to which a collection of persons is perceived as being
bound together in a coherent unit
How “group” are we?
Properties that increase entitativity
Interdependence: Members must depend on each other to accomplish the task
and/or to receive valued outcomes
Importance: The group has meaning and value for members
Interaction: Members engage in formal or informal activities, communications,
relations, etc.
Duration: The length of time the group has been together
Similarity: The degree to which members resemble each other are on certain
attributes
Cohesion: Attraction and commitment to the group
Properties that decrease group entitativity
Size: Number of members in group
Permeability: How easy it is to join or leave group (if it’s difficult to join, you feel even more
Which of these group properties is the most important for
creating high group entitativity?
a. Size
b. Cohesion
c. Interaction
d. Permeability
e. Duration
f. Similarity
c. Interaction
Interaction is the most important for creating high group entitativity
Functions of groups/teams
- Facilitate accomplishment of certain tasks
- Satisfies our need to belong (frisbee clip)
- Allows us to make sense of the world (monkey given cucumber / grape) - social comparison theory
-Allows us to understand ourselves - (Social identity theory, Self-categorization theory) - Provide utilitarian benefits
Social comparison theory
people want to hold accurate views of themselves and of the world
People turn to others especially for beliefs for which there is no physical reality (e.g., preferences, opinions, norms)
Social identity theory
people define themselves (and others) partly in terms of group membership
Exchange theory
social relations (including those within groups) help to fulfill the individual’s needs (such as the need to belong), and often take the form of exchange processes
according to Delizonna (2017), what leadership behaviours lead to psychology safety, which in turn lead to team performance?
- Approaching conflict in
a collaborative manner - Speaking human to
human - Anticipating
reactions/preparing
responses - Replacing blame with
curiosity - Asking for feedback on
delivery
probable exam question: if a team leader wants to use the insights from Delizonna (2017), what are concrete examples of leadership behaviours they could do? (use 2 different inputs)/
approaching conflict in a collab. manner: Instead of sending a generic email update about a project status, the leader takes the time to have a one-on-one conversation with each team member. They express genuine interest in how the team member is doing, acknowledge their contributions, and discuss any challenges or concerns in a compassionate manner.
Speaking human to human:
Example: Instead of sending a generic email update about a project status, the leader takes the time to have a one-on-one conversation with each team member. They express genuine interest in how the team member is doing, acknowledge their contributions, and discuss any challenges or concerns in a compassionate manner.