W8: Toxicology Flashcards
toxicology
qualitative & quantitative study of adverse reaction of toxins & Toxicants on living organisms.
toxin
poison of natural origin
toxicant
hazardous substance of chemical origin
4 classifications of toxicology
occupational, env, forensic, clinical
pharmacokinetics
absorption, distribution, biotransformation & excretion of drugs & chemicals.
pharmacodynamics
biochemical & physiological effects of chemicals to the body & mechanisms of their actions.
sample types
urine
blood
hair
saliva
sample adulteration
Biological
Dilute sample by drinking large amounts H2O prior to test
Chemical
Acid, bleach, oxidants
Addition of drugs
eg spiking with methadone to demonstrate compliance
Urine substitution
Synthetic urine
Someone else’s
Pet’s
Other liquid
sample integrity checks
Supervised sample collection
Measure urine creatinine/electrolytes
Creatinine <2.0 mmol/L ‘dilute’
pH
Normal urine pH ~4.5-9.0
Specific gravity
Appearance
Temperature on collection
Green - ?methadone spike
Odour - ?bleach
Measure metabolites
why does toxicology matter?
Occupational: workplaces SAFE
Env: environmental contaminants are SAFELY disposed of
Forensic : responsible culprits identified correctly & made accountable for their actions.
Clinical : SAFETY & well being of every person
analytical techniques
Thin Layer Chromatography
Immunoassay
Gas Chromatography
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Detection of unknown drugs by mass spectrometry
POCT
thin layer chromatography
Can detect parent drugs and their metabolites in most cases
Specialist manual assay requires considerable experience for interpretation of results
TLC precision/accuracy
Qualitative assay
Semi-quantitative assays possible with use of standards and densitometry
TLC sensitivity
relatively poor
TLC specificity
Poor; overlapping spots e.g methadone/EDDP
User variability in interpretation
TLC sample types
Primarily urine
Little/no sample preparation required
TLC speed
Long assays – at least 3-4 hr/plate, up to 20 samples/plate
Difficult to automate
TLC cost
TLC plates & solvents relatively cheap
Standards more expensive
TLC instrumentation
Requires fume cupboard for toxic solvents / developing
TLC staffing/ease of use
Experienced staff required for interpretation
Health and safety aspects of solvents and staining
TLC POCT
not suitable
immunoassays: precision/accuracy
Good precision on most automated analysers
Lack of specificity impacts on accuracy due to cross reactivity to structurally related drugs
immunoassays: sensitivity
depends on Ab
immunoassays: specificity
Limited – drug group specific rather than single drug specific, can also get cross reactivity between drug groups
immunoassays: sample types
Primarily urine
No sample preparation required.
Low sample volume
immunoassays: speed
Quick <1 hr
Amenable to large batches
immunoassays: cost
Immunoassay kits relatively expensive due to cost of Abs
immunoassays: instrumentation
Existing automated immunoassay analysers
immunoassays: staffing/ease of use
Can be added to existing IA repertoire with little or no change in staffing/training
Minimal additional H&S concerns other than handling liquid reagents
immunoassays: POCT
Most POCT devices IA based
gas chromatography: precision/accuracy
good
gas chromatography: sensitivity
Flame ionisation / MS detectors very high sensitivity
gas chromatography: specificity
Detectors used in GC very high specificity
gas chromatography: sample types
Most sample types amenable to GC i.e. urine, blood, serum, plasma, hair
Forensics - Fluids, Tissue extracts
gas chromatography: speed
Long sample preparation due to hydrolysis/derivitisation/extraction
Chromatography run times at least 10 min/sample
gas chromatography: cost
Expensive - Hardware, Gases, Columns, Software (libraries)
gas chromatography: instrumentation
GC, columns, detector, gases, sample prep/derivitisation materials
gas chromatography: staffing/ease of use
Extensive experience required for method development, troubleshooting and interpretation
H&S aspects of gases and solvents
gas chromatography: POCT
not suitable
Liquid Chromatography (Tandem) Mass Spectrometry
Has become the standard clinical laboratory tool for confirmatory drugs of abuse screening
Advantages over GC:
Allows simultaneous detection of multiple compounds
Can analyse polar, non-volatile, heat labile compounds
No need to derivatise
Quicker run times
LC-MS/MS: precision/accuracy
v good
LC-MS/MSL sensitivity
Good
Most urine DOA guideline cut-off concs well above functional sensitivity of MS
LC-MS/MS: specificity
Excellent if using MRM, optimisation of chromatography required to ensure max resolution & separation of multiple drug peaks
LC-MS/MS: sample types
Urine & oral fluid
May require extensive sample prep (hydrolysis & extraction)
Does not require derivatisation
Potential for matrix effects (ion suppression)
LC-MS/MS: speed
5-6 min sample injection time, 100 samples ~10 hr (overnight run)
LC-MS/MS: cost
V expensive hardware, columns, analytical grade purity solvents
Internal standards expensive
LC-MS/MC: instrumentation
Specialist LC-MS equipment required, fume cupboard for solvent waste
LC-MS/MS: staffing/ease of use
Considerable expertise required for method development, troubleshooting & interpretation
H&S aspects of solvents/gases
LC-MS/MS: POCT
not suitable
Time of Flight MS
Useful for detection of unknown compounds
Can be used to identify compounds based on their parent/fragment composition
toxbase
A national database and learning tool for all toxins/toxicants
Regularly updated, includes treatment plans, etc.
Used by all medical professionals as the “go to” advice/info
National Poisons Information Service (NPIS)
As well as all the above, also collates reports and issues national statistics
POCT
Majority based on immunochemical ‘lateral flow device’ technology
Hence still have inherent disadvantages of immunochemical assays i.e poor specificity and cross reactivity
Mostly qualitative or semi-quantitative competitive IAs
Useful for emergency toxicology where treatment can be initiated or to explain signs / symptoms
Results of IA always require confirmation!!
POCT: precision/accuracy
Antibody dependent
Lot-to-lot variability
Lack of QC use/availability
POCT: sensitivity
Ab dependent
POCT: specificity
Poor, largely IA based hence subject to poor specificity and cross reactivity
POCT: sample types
Urine/oral fluid, no sample prep required
Can be performed by non-technical/non-lab staff
POCT: speed
Rapid, typical result <1 min
POCT: cost
high cost/test
POCT: instrumentation
automated readers and IT interface to enable results are transmitted into patient record
CPA accreditation standards for POCT
POCT: staffing/ease of use
Able to be performed by non-lab staff
No H&S concerns other than handling urine sample
Subjective results
chromatography vs immunoassay: applicability
wide
limited
chromatography vs immunoassay: specificity
yes
sometimes
chromatography vs immunoassay: speed
slow
fast
chromatography vs immunoassay: capital cost
high
low-medium
chromatography vs immunoassay: consumable cost
low
medium-high
chromatography vs immunoassay: skill required
medium-high
low-medium
chromatography vs immunoassay: suitability for stat analysis
poor
good
medical laboratory service consists of… (4)
routine testing
ID of materials responsible for acute or chronic poisoning
detection of drugs of abuse
therapeutic drug monitoring
therapeutic drugs
Monitoring drugs with narrow therapeutic range at designated intervals to maintain constant concentration in the blood and optimize the dosage regime.
Immunoassay methods-Automated platforms mainly used in routine medical laboratory settings.