W7 Probabilities ✅ Flashcards
Part 1 of Reasoning & Decision-Making
What are the factor that influence wrong probability judgements?
Heuristics: shortcuts that reduce effort but are prone to bias/error
-> 3 types of heuristics strategies: availability, representativeness and anchoring
Heuristics strategies are based on ecological rationality: Apparent biases from rational responses using ecology (context-clue) Ps operate in
-> 2 phenomena: natural frequencies, misperception of randomness
What are supporting evidence for availability heuristic?
- Estimates causes of death: people overestimate rare events (e.g. deaths by sharks) and underestimate common events) -> more headlines for deaths by sharks
- Effect of memory: names of famous group are easier to remember, especially for gender with more famous names
- Conjunction fallacy: two events happened at the same time will be more likely to happen together than each event happen separately.
-> words with ‘—ing’ is more frequent than words with ‘—-n-‘
What are supporting evidence for representativeness heuristic?
- Judgments of probability: based on assessments of similarity to existing figures
- Base rate neglect: based judgement on the description, ignoring base rate (population probability)
What are supporting evidence for anchoring heuristic?
Statistics are taken at random (Ps spin the wheel) AND rigged wheel to give either 10% or 65%
=> Ps’ guesses to a question based on the random number they got (irrational)
Explanation: anchor number adjusted the estimate people made as opposed to figuring out true value
What are 2 biases due to ecological rationality and their explanations?
- Natural frequencies
- Misperception of randomness
What are supporting evidence for the misperception of randomness bias?
- Gambler’s Fallacy: people expect a long sequence to be randomly generated.
-> e.g. HHHHHT is not as representative as HTHTTH (coin flip)
-> even when probability is still 50/50 whether the streak continues or not. - Past experience: Inappropriate generalization of past experience
-> Random mechanical outcomes = Sampling without replacement - Memory constraints assumptions:
-> People only ever see finite sequences
-> People can only hold a short subsection of a sequence in memory (e.g., the last 4 outcomes)
What is the supporting evidence for natural frequencies bias?
- Natural frequencies: people are better at tracking natural frequencies (numbers > percentage of probability)
-> Example: guess probability of breast cancer with positive mammogram
=> Bayes’ equation allows us to update estimated probability based on existing and new knowledge.