W4L2 explaining human behavior Flashcards
What is nature and nuture
- Nature: behaviour is determined by genetics; environment has little influence
- Nurture: behaviour is determined by learning from the environment and genetics has little influence
The Seville Statement on Violence (UNESCO, 1989), refutes “the notion that organized human violence is biologically determined
- It is scientifically incorrect to say that we have inherited a tendency to make war from our animal ancestors
- It is scientifically incorrect to say that war or any other violent behaviour is genetically programmed into our human nature
- It is scientifically incorrect to say that in the course of evolution there has been a selection for aggressive behaviour more than for any other kinds of behaviour
- It is scientifically incorrect to say that humans have a violent brain
- It is scientifically incorrect to say that war is caused by instinct or any single motivation
Nature and nuture characteristic
Some characteristics do have a genetic cause:
* cystic fibrosis: caused by a recessive gene located on chromosome 7
* red hair: caused by variants of the MC1R gene complex, located on chromosome 16
Some characteristics have an environmental cause:
* the acquisition of a particular language depends upon what is spoken in the child’s environment
Mostly they reflect both:
* the phenotype (or set of traits) produced by a gene(s) may depend upon the context in which the gene is expressed
Cross-fostering experiments in animal
Offspring are randomly split between biological and ‘foster’ parents and differences in trait expression reveal the influence of ‘genetic’ and ‘environmental effects
-In rat, cross fostering does not have an effect on gene expression BUT embryo transfer can affect gene expression
Distinguishing between genes &
environment Experiment in human
Adoption studies
* comparisons between offspring behavior and the characteristics of both the biological and adoptive parents
Twin studies
* classical twin studies compare data from identical/monozygotic (MZ) with fraternal/dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, raised in the same circumstances
Types of twins
Dizygotic Twins, separate amniotic sac
B. Dizygotic Twins, shared amniotic sac (rare)
C. Monozygotic Twins, share/ separate amniotic sac
Heretibility study result
- identify if sleep pattern is genetic or not: no genetic correlation in school day but on free day, genetic is a stronger determinations factor (genetic can be overwritten)
-study on drug dependent: show large variability between control. Cultural influences
Methodological approaches to human studies
- Construct an evolutionary explanation of a pattern human emotions: weak data to explore the evolution of disgust
- Ask why a behaviour is maintained in the population, despite a fitness cost human handedness: what maintains a polymorphism with
Study on human emotion: disgust and disease
Web-based survey (hosted by the BBC), completed by 77,000 people, but
exclusions yielded < 40,000 respondents
respondents asked to view photographs and rank them according to disgust (internet based)
respondents mostly from Europe (78%), with others from North America
and Canada (13%), Asia (5%), Oceania (2%), Africa (2%), South America (1%)
Result of the disease and disgust study
- 98% of respondents found the disease-relevant pictures equally or more disgusting than their pairs
- no interaction between ranking and respondent’s location was reported (not surprising – why?)
- females (mean 3.5) rated disease-salient images significantly more disgusting than males (mean 3.2)
-ranking of disgust decrease with age (historical difference)
-large variation in disease-irrelevant images
-little evidence that these respond have biological origin, more likely to be culture inspired
Sharing toothbrush study
-more likely to share with people closer to us
Sharing a person’s bodily fluids becomes more disgusting as that person becomes
less familiar because strangers are more likely to carry novel pathogens and
hence present a greater disease threat to a naive immune system
Basic on lefthandness
- left-handed people in the minority in all human populations
- several alleged fitness costs associated with left-handedness
- countervailing benefit must exist to maintain polymorphism
left handiness gene association
Sample of 30,161 subjects aged 18–69 from a questionnaire survey of the older
Finnish Twin Cohort
Environmental effects account for most observed variance in handedness, but estimates of familial effects increased if forced handedness was taken into account
-MZ have higher percentage than DZ
Cost of left handedness
- eight hand have longer life expectancy
-but cost occur post-reproduction age so unlikely to be a strong selection pressure
Left handiness benefit
left-handed people have an advantage in sports involving dual confrontations (fencing, tennis, baseball)
* if left-handed people have similar advantage in aggressive interactions, then left-handedness predicted to be more prevalent in more violent societies