w4: Piaget Genetic Epistemology

Question 1

Genetic Epistemology

Answer 1

Piaget’s broader framework goes beyond cognitive development stages. It is a study of the genesis of knowledge through experimental and interdisciplinary research.

how is knowledge acquired?

Archival evidence, like Rockefeller Foundation documents, reveals Piaget’s focus on scientific philosophy, blending psychology, epistemology, and logic.

Piaget’s genetic epistemology remains underappreciated due to translation gaps and Cold War-era misunderstandings

Question 2

Piaget’s Interdisciplinarity

Answer 2

Collaboration Across Disciplines:

Piaget blended insights from psychology, biology, logic, and mathematics to understand the evolution of knowledge.
He believed that developmental psychology needed support from these disciplines to move from descriptive to explanatory levels of scienc

Founding of the International Centre for Genetic Epistemology (CIEG): established to facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration.

Piaget explicitly stated that real progress required crossing disciplinary boundaries, arguing that isolated disciplines risked short-sightedness​

Example: Piaget and Inhelder’s (1969) work on geometry:

They showed that children’s understanding of spatial relationships follows a sequence from topology (qualitative spatial relationships) to Euclidean geometry (quantitative spatial relationships).

Question 3

Piaget’s knowledge construction
challenging rote learning

Answer 3

Constructivist Foundation:

Piaget argued that children construct knowledge through interaction, rather than absorbing it passively from teaching

Example: Experiments with number conservation:
A six-year-old child might fail to recognise that the number of objects remains the same when their arrangement changes.
By age seven, children grasp this through logical operations, such as one-to-one correspondence

Critique of Verbal Teaching:

Piaget demonstrated that premature teaching of mathematical or logical concepts leads to superficial understanding.
Example: Teaching children to count without conceptual understanding of numbers results in rote memorisation without comprehension of conservation principle

Question 4

Significance of Archival Reserch

Answer 4

Unpublished Manuscripts:
These documents reveal Piaget’s focus on how children intuitively and empirically build logical structures, such as causality and classification​

Example: Piaget’s emphasis on logical abstraction shows how children integrate physical experiences into broader cognitive schemas.

Historical Misrepresentation:

Piaget’s interdisciplinary and philosophical work was overshadowed during the Cold War era by an emphasis on his educational psychology.
Archival records reveal his broader ambition to link individual cognitive development with the evolution of scientific knowledge

Question 5

how we can get “an Einstein” if humans are born with almost nothing (just basic reflexes)

How do humans w basic reflexes develop advanced thinking?

Answer 5

Piaget posited that humans start with reflex schemas which evolve through assimilation (fitting new information into existing schemas) and accommodation (modifying schemas to incorporate new knowledge)​

Question 6

mathematical concepts

eg. knowledge construction

Answer 6

Mathematical Concepts: Children construct knowledge through interaction rather than direct teaching. For instance, they discover conservation of number through one-to-one correspondence experiments rather than rote memorisation​

Piaget’s experiments showed that children develop logical structures akin to scientific reasoning (e.g., understanding spatial relationships before numerical abstraction)

Policy Implication:

Focus on fostering environments that stimulate exploration and self-driven learning rather than imposing pre-structured knowledge​

Question 7

Philosophy-psychology intersection

Answer 7

Piaget argued for the inseparability of epistemology and psychology, emphasising that understanding how knowledge develops requires studying mental and logical processes​
​
.
Example: Genetic epistemology integrates logical empiricism (scientific philosophy) and constructivism (knowledge as constructed through experience)​

Question 8

Historical context Piaget’s work

Answer 8

Cold War interests shaped the popularisation of Piaget’s theories, often sidelining their philosophical depth in favour of their practical applications in education​
.
Interdisciplinarity was crucial to Piaget’s program, bridging biology, psychology, and philosophy

Question 9

Science and Child development

Answer 9

Piaget linked scientific reasoning to child development. He suggested that the logical operations used in science (e.g., classification, causality) emerge from cognitive structures first observed in children​
.

Question 10

Constructivism in Science

Answer 10

Knowledge builds progressively: Just as children construct logical schemas through interaction, scientists create theories by abstracting from observations

hilosophical Insight:

Science involves constructing and testing knowledge frameworks, not just collecting data. Piaget’s work demonstrates how epistemology is rooted in developmental psychology

Question 11

historical sequence geometric understanding

Answer 11

Geometry historically evolved from Euclidean geometry (figures and angles) to projective geometry (perspective and projections), and finally to topology (qualitative spatial relationships)

Question 12

children developmental sequence- geometric understanding

Answer 12

Children first grasp topological concepts:
By age three, they can distinguish between open and closed shapes or interior and exterior spaces.
Example: When copying a square, children might simplify it to a closed circle, focusing on its topological properties rather than specific Euclidean characteristics​
.
Euclidean and projective concepts develop later:
After mastering topological relationships, children begin understanding angles, distances, and projections simultaneously but much later in development

Question 13

Piaget’s conclusion- geometry+children+hisotry

Answer 13

Piaget’s Conclusion:

The developmental order of geometry in children contrasts with the historical progression, emphasizing that children’s early cognitive schemas prioritize qualitative spatial relationships (topology) before they can conceptualize more abstract geometrical principles like those in Euclidean or projective systems​

Question 14

Logical Empiricism

Answer 14

An Americanised form of logical positivism (originating with the Vienna Circle), aiming to create a scientific basis for philosophy by combining empiricism, logic, and mathematics.

asserts that all meaningful knowledge must be either empirically verifiable or logically deducible.
It assumes knowledge consists of fixed, universal structures derived from experience or rational deduction

Question 15

Piaget’s challenge of logical empiricism

through object permanence

Answer 15

Object Permanence Definition:

The understanding that objects continue to exist even when they are not visible or directly observable.
Piaget’s Argument:

Piaget observed that object permanence emerges developmentally through active exploration and interaction with the environment.
Infants initially lack this understanding and gradually construct it through trial and error (e.g., searching for a hidden toy).
This process involves:
Assimilation: Fitting new experiences into existing cognitive frameworks.
Accommodation: Modifying frameworks to include new experiences.

Critique of Logical Empiricism:

Logical empiricism would treat object permanence as a concept that can be directly derived from sensory experience or logical deduction.
Piaget counters this by showing that object permanence is not innate or immediately evident—it is constructed through developmental stages, challenging the static, universal assumptions of logical empiricism .

Question 16

Intuitionism

Answer 16

A Dutch philosophical movement asserting that mathematical truths are mental constructs, not inherent “a priori” truths​
.

L.E.J. Brouwer, a key proponent, argued that numbers and mathematical principles are products of human mental activity rather than universal, pre-existing truths.
Piaget integrated this into his theories by demonstrating how children construct mathematical concepts (e.g., conservation of number) through experiential interaction

Question 17

Constructivism

Answer 17

The philosophy that knowledge arises from empirical experience but is organised into meaningful abstractions through mental processes.

Piaget’s genetic epistemology is inherently constructivist, positing that children actively build knowledge through processes of assimilation (incorporating new experiences into existing schemas) and accommodation (adjusting schemas to fit new experiences).
This rejects rote learning, emphasising self-driven exploration and logical construction.

Question 18

Social Constructionism

Answer 18

Definition: The view that meanings and knowledge originate from social interactions and group dynamics​
.
Explanation:
Piaget’s theories emphasised that cognitive development occurs within a social context, where interactions with peers and adults shape understanding.
For example, a child learns concepts like fairness through shared activities, debates, and negotiated rules​

Question 19

Empirical Foundation

Answer 19

Definition: Empiricism, the basis of science, is about what can be observed and experienced, not just experimentally but also through naturalistic inquiry​
​
.
Explanation:
Piaget employed empirical foundations to study how children construct knowledge, using systematic observations and experiments to map developmental stages.
His methods combined empirical observation with logical analysis, bridging psychology and philosophy​
​
.
Example: Observing a child’s progression in understanding spatial relationships, such as distinguishing between open and closed shapes, demonstrates the empirical grounding of Piaget’s research​
.

Question 20

Disciplinarian Isolation

Answer 20

The separation of psychology and philosophy as distinct fields, avoiding overlaps like “psychologism,” which explains philosophical problems solely through psychology

Explanation:
Piaget opposed strict disciplinarian isolation, arguing that understanding the genesis of knowledge requires a combined psychological and philosophical approach.
He blurred these boundaries by studying how mental processes (psychology) underpin epistemological concepts like causality and time

Example: Piaget’s integration of psychological experiments (e.g., child development studies) with epistemological questions (e.g., the construction of logic) demonstrates this interdisciplinary approach​
.

Question 21

Echolalia

Answer 21

repeating the words for numbers without understanding their meaning

whats wanted from teaching isn’t counting: its the ability to think using numbers

we can teach names of numbers but not numeracy.

Question 22

one-to-one-correspondence

Bertrand Russel

Answer 22

defined numbers using ‘one-to-one’ correspondence.

• two mathematical sets can be said to have the same number (an abstraction not a property) if the members of each set corresponds (matches) one to the other
• when asked to compare two sets, Piaget shows that children don’t asnwer as Russel would have thought.
• whether a correct answer was given was dependent on experience- which only correlates with age

Question 23

Conservation - general principle Piaget

Answer 23

children conserve irrelevantly before they do relevantly.

term describing this: decentration
basically by focusing on different things

ie. two small red circles vs one big blue circle.
which is more?
chilren = blue because its bigger, bigger = more.

older chilren interpret ‘more’ numerically and understand the ambigious question.

Question 24

Decentration

Answer 24

Decentration: The cognitive ability to move away from a single, self-centered perspective and consider multiple aspects of a situation simultaneously.

It marks a critical transition in Piaget’s stages of cognitive development, particularly from preoperational to concrete operational thinking.

The understanding that certain properties of objects (e.g., volume, mass, number) remain constant even when their appearance changes.
Conservation tasks often require decentration because the child must:
Focus on multiple aspects of a problem (e.g., height and width of a liquid container).
Recognise that changes in one dimension (e.g., height) do not necessarily affect another (e.g., volume).

Question 25

conservation of numbers

Answer 25

is the idea that we name (a kind of quality) when we refer to the abstraction of sets having one to one correspondence of different sizes.

Question 26

Poincare and Brouwer = number is ‘primitive’
piaget - disproves

Answer 26

Piaget’s experiemnts disprove the hypothesis that numbers are primitive.

instead the construction of a number follows the construction of quantity.

number = abstraction of quantity

once this is understood, dont need one to one correspondence anymore (ie. finger counting) but can think of numbers abstractly (mentally)

Question 27

Purpose of genetic epistemology

Answer 27

has been misunderstood as providing evidence about how children cognitively develop.

adn they do that too

they were meant to be about the evolution of reasons: humanity’s technologies of thought, like maths

Question 28

what genetic epustemology was trying to teach

Answer 28

one to one correspondences can be taught

the understanding of what IS a number has to come from the child- can’t be taught

number = abstration that things have in common
call it numbers or something else, its the same.

problem: teachers dont see that numbers is an example. education system is teaching kids abstractions about the world, trying to teach children to reason

Question 29

Genetic epistemology NOT psychology

Answer 29

It’s a contribution only relative to broader philosophical concerns: “how does knowledge itself grow, if we purposefully decentre from philosophical assumptions?”

That was the interdisciplinary endeavour spanning 1950-1984, where interdisciplinarity itself requires a decentration from disciplinarian isolation: a further development in reasoning

Question 30

how do we carry genetic epistemology forward

Answer 30

Everything we know is both external (knowledge) and internal (psychological)

If something is going to get “inside,” there are two ways:

• Teaching (external)
• Reconstruction from within (internal)

That epistemological problem is then philosophical and psychological

Question 31

Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Development

Answer 31

1. sensisomotor stage
2. preoperational stage
3. concrete operational stage
4. formal operational stage

Question 32

Piaget’s Stages

1.Sensisomotor stage

Answer 32

idea: learn through sensory experience and motor actions

concepts:
- object permanence: n/a - understanding objeces exists even out of signt
- ecocentrism: inability to distinguish self and external world.

philosophical context:
- raises epistemological questions abut how humans for a basic understanding of reality.
- highlights empiricism, as knowledge is seen as emerging from interactions with the environment.

Question 33

Piaget’s Stages

2.Preoperational Stage

Answer 33

symbolic thiking develops but reasoning is still intuitive and egocentric.

concepts:
- symbolid function: ability to use symbols to represent objects (words, image).
- conservation task: struggle to understand quantity remains the same regardless of size.

philosophical context:
Reflects constructivist ideas, where knowledge is actively constructed rather than passively received.

Raises questions about the limits of logic and abstract reasoning at early stages of life.

Question 34

Piaget’s Stages

3. Concrete Operational

Answer 34

Logical thinking develops, but is limited to concrete, tangible concepts.

Concepts:
Decentration: Ability to consider multiple aspects of a problem simultaneously.

Reversibility: Understanding that actions can be reversed, restoring an object or situation to its original state.

Philosophical Context:
Introduces a shift toward realism, where children start to apply logic to understand the external world.
Raises ontological questions about how the mind processes tangible versus abstract realities.

Question 35

Piaget’s stages

4. Formal Operational Stage

Answer 35

abstract and hypothetical thinking emerges, enabling deductive reasoning.

Concepts:
Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning: Formulating hypotheses and testing them systematically.

Abstract Thought: Ability to reason about concepts not tied to physical objects or experiences

Philosophical Context:
Reflects rationalist traditions by highlighting the mind’s ability to reason independently of sensory experience.
Explores the emergence of self-reflective and meta-cognitive capacities, raising questions about free will, moral reasoning, and autonom

Question 36

Philosophical Dimensions of Piaget’s model

epistemology, ontology, ethic and psych

Answer 36

1. epistemology: constructivism, suggesting that knowledge arises from active interaction between the individual and the environment.His concept of schema (mental frameworks that evolve through assimilation and accommodation) challenges purely innate or empirical models of learning.
2. Ontology: stages suggest dynamic view of human cognition- development relects interaction b/w biological maturation and environemntal experience. Model contrasts reductionist views of cogntition as mechanical processes- emphasise qualitative shifts in thought.
3. ethics and psych: development of mora reasoning closely ties to formal operational stage- implications for ethical behvaiour. Questions the responsibility and agency in individuals at different ages.

Question 37

application Piaget to philos psych

Mind and Reality:

Answer 37

Piaget’s stages highlight how perception of reality evolves, shaping debates about subjectivism and objectivism in psychology.

For example, the preoperational stage’s egocentrism challenges philosophical objectivism, while the concrete operational stage moves toward greater objectivity.

Question 38

application Piaget to philos psych

Nature vs Nurture

Answer 38

Piaget bridges this debate by integrating biological (nature) and experiential (nurture) factors into cognitive development.

Question 39

application Piaget to philos psych

Human science vs Natural Science

Answer 39

Piaget’s theory is a cornerstone of human sciences, focusing on interpretive understanding of cognitive growth rather than deterministic laws.