W3 - Individual Differences Flashcards

1
Q

What are the important Predictors and Criteria?

A

Choice, Variability & Measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Validity Coefficient (VC)?

A

The correlation coefficient between the predictor and criterion (eg. Cognitive ability and Overall job performance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Overt integrity assessment?

A

A personality test that asks direct questions about behaviours to evaluate a candidate’s honesty, ethics and overall integrity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Covert integrity assessment?

A

More indirect. Asks indirect questions on personality traits or tendencies that can suggest dishonesty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Purpose of References (eg. letter of recommendations etc)?

A

Serves as a negative selection tool.
It does not necessarily tell us which candidate to hire, instead it indicates which to NOT HIRE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Potential problems of Letters of Recommendations?

There’s 5!

A
  1. They are universally positive, hence has a restricted range that attenuates a correlation (lowers the observed correlation).
    [LOR in which applicants waive their rights to see the letter are less favourable]
  2. Different writers focus on different content.
  3. Letter quality is a reflection of the writer, not the candidate.
  4. Information provided may not help to select employees.
  5. Scoring of letter is SUBJECTIVE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is a Letter of Recommendation still useful then, despite the potential problems?

A

Research suggests that the LENGTH of letter may be a BETTER PREDICTOR of the writer’s attitude than the actual content.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the Big 5 personality traits (Predictor: Personality)?

A

OCEAN:
Openness to experience
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Neuroticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Are the Big 5 traits useful to predict job performances?

A

No, correlations with job performances are relatively LOW.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which predictor best predicts job performance?

A

Cognitive ability
Correlation = 0.51

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which two Big 5 personality traits predict job performance ACROSS JOBS AND SITUATIONS?

A

Conscientiousness
Neuroticism (Emotional stability)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is cognitive ability (predictor) uni-dimensional / multi-dimensional?

A

Uni-dimensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is personality still useful for candidate selection despite the low correlations with job performance?

A

Yes.
When the Big 5 traits (OCEAN) are considered together, the effects with job performance are typically LARGER.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the narrower traits? (not sure if this is needed!!)

A

Locus of control
Self-monitoring
Self-esteem
Positive & negative affectivity
Proactive personality
General self-efficacy
Core self-evaluations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are those higher on narcissism more likely to emerge as leaders?

A

Yes, as they promote a vision.
Due to charm, charisma, humour & extraversion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which aspect of narcissism predicts leader emergence the most?

A

Extraversion

17
Q

Are narcissistic leaders more effective?

A

A curvilinear relation suggests that mid-range level of narcissism is OPTIMAL for effectiveness.

People who interacts with them say they are not effective.
People who aren’t close to them say they are effective.

18
Q

Is ambition (middle-level trait) good?

A

Results indicate that ambition is good.

19
Q

Does a spouse’s Big 5 predict one’s job success?

A

Yes.
In terms of job satisfaction, income & likelihood of promotion.

Perform more household tasks, role model, pragmatic behaviours. Enable spouse to focus on work-related tasks, less home conflict.

20
Q

Do integrity assessments as a predictor predict job performance well?

A

No due to weak correlation (0.41 - dhtr)

21
Q

Do grades predict job performance well?

A

No due to weak correlation (0.16 - dhtr)

22
Q

Should we ask candidates about the reason for leaving their previous job?

A

Sure, as it can act as a negative selection tool.

23
Q

Does educational attainment correlate with job performance?

A

Weak correlation (0.10 - dhtr).
However, predicts better for lower entry jobs

24
Q

What 2 moderators might moderate the relation between educational attainment and job satisfaction?

A
  1. Gender - The negative relation is exacerbated for females.
  2. Self-employed vs. Other employed - No relation for self-employed. Negative for other-employed.
25
Q

DeOrtentiis et al. (2018):
Do managers hired INTERNALLY or EXTERNALLY perform better at the individual and unit level?

A

Hiring internally sees:
- Better individual performance at the beginning
- Better unit service performance
- Equal unit financial performance
- Lower salaries

26
Q

What is the best predictor for future performance (job performance)

A

Biodata.

Shows past performance of the candidate, and attempt to capture aspects of a person not captured by other assessments.

27
Q

What are the 3 ways to develop & validate a biodata instrument?

A
  1. Dustbowl empiricism - write items with any content and see what predicts
    eg. How many pizzas can you eat?
  2. Rational approach - write items of what logically seems important
    eg. How many books did you read in a month?
  3. Life history approach - separate top from bottom-level performers, and ask life history questions and look for differences
    eg. How many countries have you visited?
28
Q

Does graphology predict job performance well?

A

No evidence to show that graphology is useful.

29
Q

Get smarty pants: Cognitive ability, personality, and victimisation (2010):

Which 2 types tends to be victimised?

A
  1. Submissive individuals
  2. Provocative individuals (hostile, aggressive, dominating interpersonal behaviour)
30
Q

Get smarty pants: Cognitive ability, personality, and victimisation (2010):

Are smart people often victimised?

A

Yes, as cognitive ability is a desirable characteristic that may instigate others to hurt smarter individuals.