W3- Commercial Surrogacy Hymryd/Anderson Flashcards
Non-commercial surrogacy
no payment is provided to the surrogate mother although the prospective parents may provide reimbursement for medical care - typically occurs between family members + friends.
Commercial surrogacy
a fee is paid to the surrogate mother who carries the pregnancy - commonly occurs between individuals previously unknown to each other.
International surrogacy
commercial, gestational surrogacy which occurs across country borders, typically with prospective parents from wealthier countries + surrogate mothers from poorer countries
Harmful/wrongful exploitation
someone is [wrongfully] exploited when they are induced to behave in a manner contrary to how they want to act
Mutually advantageous / beneficial exploitation
- A + B gain relative to the no-transaction baseline, but transaction is unfair to B in some way
intended parents + surrogate gain from the transaction but the interests of wealthy contracting couples are better served
Hymryd argues
•absence of regulations has created a market that is free but not fair = mutually beneficial exploitation
•only valid objection to international surrogacy = surrogate mothers may be exploited by being given too little compensation
- international surrogacy fair is following Fair trade conditions and principles
Reasons against surrogacy
- The Welfare Argument
- The Commodification Argument
- The Exploitation Argument
- The Welfare Argument
possibility of physical / psychological harm to the surrogate mother or child.
- The Commodification Argument
International surrogacy commodifies reproduction, children + women, and unlike the international trade in coffee, human life has infinite value shouldn’t’ be traded in the marketplace.
- The Exploitation Argument
a. Mutually advantageous exploitation
b. Harmful exploitation- surrogate makes grave self sacrifice
Fair Trade Surrogacy Proposal
Regulation of international surrogacy should be concerned with limiting mutually advantageous exploitation.
3 standards of Fair Trade Surrogacy proposal
- Payment of Fair Price – should take into account surrogate mother’s time, risks + labour
- Working Conditions – safe + healthy working environment that minimize potential physical + psychological harm
- Transparency + Accountability of financial transactions between surrogacy brokers, prospective parents + surrogate mothers
2 Ways to implement fair trade surrogacy
- Formal International Agreement governing inter-country surrogacy could be developed + adopted by participating countries.
- Regulation Through Immigration Law - prospective parents must work with a nationally accredited adoption service provider (brokers + agencies involved in international surrogacy
Objections to FTS proposal
No reason to believe that the fair-trade policy benefits the child, or deduces from the notion of the child being a commodity
Rebuttal of Objections to FTS proposal
Doesn’t take into consideration the child, but perhaps if they are adequately funded or paid, they have more incentive/resources to bring the child to birth with the best resources
–> Healthier for the child in the long term
Medical Tourism Reproductive tourism
causes in which a commissioning couple offers a surrogate women money in exchange for gestational services
Anderson Argument
- commercial surrogacy is morally wrong bc it commodifies children + women’s reproductive labour
- implication of her view: only the women has parental rights / claims on the child to be
- surrogacy in all its forms is inherently problematic
Anderson commercial surrogacy 3 key issues
- commodification of children
- commodification for women’s reproductive labour
and exploitation
objections to Anderson
1) labour can always be classed a commodity- can be considered a standard job
2) How is it different to prostitution?
3) Not morally problematic in comparison to things we already allow eg sweatshops
Rebuttal of objections to Anderson
1) dire health risks- not accurately compensated
2) surrogacy is expensive- thus onlt avaible to upper class leading to social inequity