W2 survey approaches Flashcards
Construct
the idea of the thing, does not exist by itself
not directly observable - construct
e.g., attitude, parenting skill, anxiety, personality traits
Measures
data collection methods that are believed to tap the construct
- self report measures, explicit attitude scale, psychophysiological measures
- these are our variables
Creating scores from measures
For example, total score on a perfectionism scale, the averaged output of psychophysiology
- measures are all operations or operational definitions
- operation = where do the actual numbers (in SPSS) come from?
How good are the measures?
- Need to be able to trust our measurements, or our results can be brushed aside immediately
- This involves matters of degree and it is formalised as reliability and validity
- > it’s not a black and white judgement
- > reliability based on random error
- > validity based on coverage of correct underlying construct
- All we have are the observed scores
True score
the systematic effect of the underlying construct
e.g., how much I actually know stats
E.g., should be unchanging across occasions without some treatment to increase (or decrease) it
Systematic error
unrelated but systematic factors
e.g., how well I perform in testing situations in general
People with low test anxiety systematically better than high test anxiety people
Random error
chance, changeable factors
Whether or not I happened to get little sleep one night at random
Components of observed scores
- the systematic effect of the underlying construct [true score]
- also, unrelated but systematic factors [systematic error]
- chance, changeable factors [random error]
Inferential statistics
- using sample data to make inferences about population parameters
- if nothing else is known, the statistics of a sample (e.g., the mean) are the best estimates of the population parameters (e.g., height of Griffith students based on this class).
Sampling bias
- due to faulty sampling methods, some important subgroups of the population may be over- or under-represented in our sample
- > Systematic variation
Avoidable through random sampling: Ideally, every member of target population should be equally likely to be selected for the sample
Example of sampling bias
A classic example…
-> American election in the 1948
Polls predicted the Republican candidate, Thomas Dewey would win
However, the Democrat, Harry S. Truman, won by a landslide, sample was biased as it was done via phone calls, this sample was more affluent than the general public and therefore was not generalisable
Sampling error
- the term ‘sampling error’ implies a mistake but this is misleading … it’s a natural thing and can’t be helped.
- > Think of this as sampling fluctuation
so the question is not whether the sample mean differs from the population mean (it almost always will) but
-> how likely is it that the difference we observed could have occurred by chance
Sampling distributions
- the distribution of a statistic that we would expect if we drew an infinite number of samples (of a given size) from the population
- sampling distributions have means and SDs
- can have a sampling distribution for any statistic, but the most common is the sampling distribution of the mean
Standard error
the standard error of the mean is the standard deviation of a distribution of sample means
- it represents the typical or average distance between a sample mean and the mean of the population
- used to define and accurately measure sampling error