W11 longitudinal designs Flashcards
Determinations of causation are based on three criteria
- The constructs need to covary
- There must be temporal precedence
- No confounding factors (i.e. alternative explanations need to be ruled out)
Temporal precedence
- in cross-sectional research, temporal precedence can never be directly empirically tested
- the ‘causal’ direction is inferred by allocating a variable as the criterion (DV), and others as the predictors (IVs). This suggests the IVs ‘cause’ the DV
- theory and previous empirical; findings are used to justify the direction of the statistical analysis
Panel designs
- panel designs are the gold-standard technique in longitudinal research
- in a panel design, the same participants complete the same questionnaire over multiple time points
- this ensures that both the predictor and criterion variable are measured at multiple time points
Stability and change
Stability:
the degree of consistency in scores, means, or rank orders from one time point to another
Change:
the degree of fluctuation in scores, means, or rank orders from one time point to another
In what ways and how much do things stay the same over time versus how much do they change. Often tested as baseline (the initial measurement) to re-test
Uni directional relationship of association
Uni
- there is a clear direction in the relationship between the predictor and criterion variable
- a uni-directional relationship in a well-designed longitudinal study provides support for temporal precedence
Bi-directional relationship of association
- occurs when the predictor variable is related to the criterion variable, and the criterion variable is related to the predictor variable
- in this instance, it is not possible to conclude that one variable occurred prior to the other, so temporal precedence cannot be determined. Rather both variables ‘cause’ one another
Simplex designs
- simplex designs, also known as autoregressive designs, involve regressing a variable on itself across time
- in other words, the measurement of a variable at time 1 should predict time 2 (i.e. stability)
- this type of model is called autoregressive as the values of a scale are automatically regressed onto the same scale
- this type of analysis allows researchers to explore the stability and change in one construct
Simplex designs - stable association
- a perfect association between the two time-points indicates that individual’s relative standings on the construct have not changed
- the rank-order of the participants remains the same. Participants with high T1 scores, will have high T2 scores (i.e. there is a high degree of stability from T1 to T2)
Simplex designs: stability
- a large autoregressive coefficient can mean one of two things (in this course)
1. individuals do not change over time
2. individuals uniformly increase or decrease over time - across each explanation, the rank-order of the participants have not changed, therefore on a between-participant level (inter-individual) there is stability
Simplex designs - changing relative standings
- a small or zero association between the two time-points indicate that individual’s relative standings on the construct have changed dramatically
- with a low autoregressive association, it indicates a rank-order change in the participants scores from T1 to T2, thus there is change between individuals
Simplex designs - temporal stability v change
- look up image
- blue is T1 red T2
Longitudinal correlations
- longitudinal correlations examine the relationship between the IV at T1 and DV at T2
- similar to the correlations and bivariate regression techniques covered in this course, only two variables are analysed
- if there is a sig relationship between IV1 and DV2 but no sig relationship between DV1 and IV2, it can be argued that temporal precedence has ben found
- > if both sig, may indicate bi-directional relationship
Longitudinal correlations - weaknesses
- this analysis does not account for correlations between variables at each time point
- does not account for the stability in a construct
- > there is no indication of the stability or change in the construct over time
- the combination of these limitations ensures researchers cannot rule out that the relationship between T1 and T2 is simply due to a cross-sectional relationship
Residualised longitudinal regression
- to address the limitations of longitudinal correlations, researchers can ‘residualise’ the DV
- this is done by entering the score of the DV at T1 into the analysis
- as a result, the correlation between the DV across two time points is considered (i.e. stability), then statistically removed from the analysis
- this process allows researchers to ‘predict change’
- by entering the DV at T1, the unique variance remaining in the DV at T2, reflects the change in the construct over time
- look up image
Strengths and weaknesses residualised longitudinal regression
Strengths
- The correlations between variables at T1 statistically controlled for.
- The stability of the DV is accounted for.
- Consequentially, this analytical technique allows a researcher to predict change (in other words, find a longitudinal effect).
Weaknesses
- Temporal precedence is still not identifiable because there is no test for bi-directional relationships.