VIVA Flashcards
information (elements of thinking)
data, facts, evidence, experiences required to answer
questions
concepts (critical thinking)
ideas, theories, laws and principles that underpin our
thinking
Depth (intellectual standard)
Extent of complexity (e.g. number of factors and interrelationships) recognised and addressed in an issue, problem or topic
Breadth (intellectual standard)
Encompassing multiple viewpoints
Logical (intellectual standard)
The parts of the thinking/analysis make sense together, no
contradictions.
Significance (intellectual standard)
Importance to the matter under consideration
Body Functions
physiological functions of body systems
Body Structures
anatomical parts of the body
capabilities
what a person can do either without difficulty or with modification
disability
any condition that makes it more difficult for a person to do certain activities or interact with the world around them
Clinical Reasoning
a reflective process of inquiry and analysis carried out by a health
professional in collaboration with the patient or client with the aim of understanding the
person, their context and their clinical problem(s) in order to guide evidence-informed
practice
Interactive reasoning
The thinking and behaviour involved in the purposeful establishment
and ongoing management of the patient/client-therapist therapeutic alliance and rapport.
Collaborative Reasoning
The health care collaboration between the therapist and the
individual (and sometimes trusted family member, parent/caregiver or close friend) in
making choices about care, based on provision of the therapist’s analysis, evidence-based
information about options, outcomes and uncertainties, and the patient’s preferences
Priming
being overly biased by prior information such as a referral that provides a
diagnosis, a handover summary, or a medical imaging report of pathology that the therapist
assumes is the source of the patient’s or client’s symptoms and disability.
cognitive bias
occurs when initial impressions and preferred analysis (e.g. clinical patterns)
lead the therapist to validate their reasoning by preferentially attending to findings which
support their thinking and neglecting or misinterpreting findings that don’t support their
analysis.